Why is burst fire on the m16 so bad?
Every time I try to use burst fire on the m16, no shots hit even at close range. One time I was maybe 30-40 meters away from somebody, neither one of us were moving, I had a red dot sight aimed right in the middle of his back. I fired two bursts and not a single shot hit. Another time I was maybe 20 meters away, iron sights, aimed center mass, and maybe 1 bullet hit out of three slow bursts. Why is it so bad? One burst fired center mass should be able to land all three bullets, yet none hit. Why?
Posted Jun 6, 2017, 7:43 PM UTC
Sounds like user error. Without a video showing exactly what is happening I think that is what it is going to be chalked up to be. There's plenty of video evidence of people using burst fire effectively at range so not sure what else can be said. Edit: A word.
Symptoms: missed shots. Diagnosis: low skill Treatment: git gud
I'm definitely not bad at the game so ok bud. I just don't like the m16
Missing first shots on a stationary object is pretty bad, pal. I don't like the m16 either. So I don't use it, chief. I also don't like the VSS, so I don't use it, bucko. Just accept that you don't like it and it's not for you instead of blaming the game
Ninja edit: I'm sympathetic to not liking a gun. With a 4x and SCAR I can hit a gnats ass from 100yds out. Gimme a VSS and I'll miss the broad side of a barn while standing in the stall. Just don't use the shit and it's all good
I don't use the m16 on burst fire anymore. Hell, I don't even pick it up if I can find another rifle. I'm simple saying that it's ridiculous how a burst fire gun can miss the FIRST shot on a non-moving target from a medium range. In my opinion, an m16 on burst should definitely be able to shoot 1 burst accurately (aka all three bullets hitting center mass) <50 meters. Something is obviously not right if the m16 can't do that.
Chocked isn't a word, you meant chalked. Sorry for the pedantry.
Fixed thanks for pointing that out hahah