How to p*ss away $23M, part 2.

new poll

We have a new poll in GA-06. In this one, Ossoff is at 49.7% for a 1.7 point lead, well within the margin of error.

Ossoff finished the special election (back in april) with 48.1% of the vote. That's almost $2M per one-tenth of one percent improvement.

What was that that "bird shit" perez said about the "thousands of elections every year"?

Thompson, a first-time candidate, was generally ignored by both parties for most of the race. When his campaign asked the state Democratic Party to fund a mailer, it was turned down, later investing just $3,000. In an interview last week, Democratic National Committee Chairman Thomas Perez said the national party would not be transferring any late money.

“We can make progress in Kansas,” Perez said. “There are thousands of elections every year, though. Can we invest in all of them? That would require a major increase in funds.”

archived source

$0 dollars (the dems were eventually shamed into chipping in too little, too late) for Jim Thompson, who lost by 7 instead of Hillary's 14 (iirc), and millions to get less than 2 percentage points for Ossoff.

Good decision making, dems. (Of course, we know there are other, more important factors that go into the distribution of corporate dems money).

If you want something funny to read with your coffee, the GOP put together "Perez's 100 days of disarray".

Looking back on Tom Perez's first 100 days as DNC Chair, the DNC has failed to help the Democrats win any major elections, has failed to help increase fundraising for the party, and has failed to hide the dysfunction plaguing the Democrat party.

Interesting choice of words there.