Junk silver - rip off?
A little bit of click bait in the title but I just got my first order of junk and I'm not sure how I feel about it. Obviously it's worn, dirty, and ugly but that doesn't bother me. What bugs me is the lack of consistency with each coin.
I got a bunch of Washington's, a couple Standing Liberty's, and a Barber. The amount of wear on each is obviously different but some are really slick and weigh at least a gram less than what they should. I understand that's probably normal but still has me thinking...
So my question...what's the appeal of junk silver if you're getting less silver for your money and it's considered ok? Is it just because it's a lower cost fractional? Because it's easily recognized and easy to sell? Because of the age and cool factor of having a 100 year old coin? All of the above and then some?
Posted Jul 13, 2017, 1:34 AM UTC
I don't buy Barbers or SLQ, specifically because I don't like slicks and the loss of weight that represents. For me, junk is usually Washington, Kennedy, Franklin, Roosevelt, and a few better grade walking liberty halves mixed in.
I think the appeal is just what you highlighted -- universally recognized and cost effective fractional sizes and historical affinity.
10% of my stack is junk.
This, with the addition of Mercury dimes. Barbers and SLQ tend to be too much slicks unless you can cherry pick them, in which case, get them.