Serious Question: The Elites After Libertarians Succeed

I feel like you don't really ask this enough, sure: socialists want totalitarian governments high taxes etc. etc. you say this all the time.

But what happens after libertarians make the state powerless? The rich people still have most of the money, and most of the property. In most of your scenarios they can even use the corrupt and weak government's police and army force to protect their property.

But this means that you won't have any property or freedom, after all I doubt any of you are as rich as Bill Gates or Mark Zuckerberg. I am aware you believe this new society to be a true meritocracy where everyone can get wealthy: but why would the rich allow that, if they can just keep everyone in poverty?

TL;DR: What's your logic that by getting rid of the state that corruption wouldn't still plague society, as rich people would still be able to bribe people to kill you, etc.?