It is unlikely that a being with maximal powers exists.

A New concept of a being is conceived.

There are possibly an infinite amount of concepts of beings that can be conceived.

Without evidence, It's possible this concieved beings exist.

Without evidence, It's possible this concieved beings do not exist.

Without evidence, Does arguments for the existence of the new conceived being, increase the likelihood that the concieved being exists? No.

What increases the possibility that a new concept exists in reality/cosmos? Evidence

As more characteristics are added to a concept, the greater evidence and quality of evidence is require, to consider if it is likely that the new concept exists.

If a concept has characteristics, that other confirmed beings that actually exist, have never been confirmed to have(aka powers), then if the evidence presented for the existence of the concept is poor, is it unlikely the concept exists.

A concept of a being with maximal powers is presented.

These powers have not been documented by any other beings that exist.

Arguments are presented for the existence of a being with maximal powers.

Arguments are not evidence for the existence of a being with maximal powers.

All Arguments for the existence of a being with maximal powers are either fallacious, invalid, and/or unsound.

There are no original documentation, with confirmed authorship, providing evidence for the existence of a being with maximal powers.

It is unlikely that the concept of a being with maximal powers exists.