I know who I'd take....
imgur.com/a/wzCNK
imgur.comPosted Aug 18, 2017, 10:08 AM UTC
2813
imgur.comCrouch/Parker is literally the only option that worth an actual discussion here. Wow
9
Depends on the category tbh. They are be compared on one stat only. If its disposals scully and sheed could be the same.
3
Lol yup. My boy dinner plates has potential but at present he's got nothing on Jack.
2
They almost always don't go the way expected. Quite difficult to get all 4.
1
They pick a comparable stat.
eg. Sheed v Scully in Clearances. Shhed is averaging 3.47, Scully 3.58
Kicks Danger (13.21) v Hoskin Elliot (11)
etc.
1
Yeah, I would choose Hoskin-Elliot also
7
I would definitely pick Hoskin-Elliot
1
[deleted]
Well the match up for this match is most kicks and they are actually quite similar in that stat (11 vs 13 on average). So perhaps that was the reason. No idea if WHE leads the pies in kicks or whether he was just the closest to Dangerfield.
[deleted]
Yeah it's things like "most kicks" "most tackles" "most marks" etc. Like Riewoldt vs McCarthy is most goals which actually could be a good contest since Jack is likely to play up the ground and have the smalls kick the goals whereas McCarthy might be playing closer to goal and get a few.
Absolutely no idea. Adams, Sidebottom, Treloar.. fuck, even put Josh Thomas and Tom Phillips ahead of him tbh.
They're similar types of player, just Danger is way better than him.
Similar in a sense that they're both AFL footballers
Both of them like to run, kick long and are both capable of scoring goals. And they're both relatively fast.