Why I think Ubisoft are taking Siege down the wrong road... Thoughts?
With a game with a strong and loyal player base yet still small in size, i believe that by removing content that has already been implemented into the game (whilst postponing more content to make a season for fixing the game) ubisoft are making the game unappealing to players wanting to get into the game. Players want new content, and if Operation Health wasn't enough (which i believe OP health was a good step) then by removing previously created content is going to make the game even more less interesting for the expanding player-base, and hearing about map removals does not paint a good image for siege; when compared with Overwatch who have content every few weeks and a great developer to player base connection. if siege are to make a game that is going somewhere in the long term then you need to listen to the loyal players. We don't want map changes, we dont want map removals, we dont want ACOG being taken off fast defensive operators... we want a stable working game with a steady flow of content. Does anyone have anything else to add?
Posted Aug 25, 2017, 1:04 PM UTC