What would happen to a fighter sized ship that "accidentally" got pushed into the grinder part of an Orion?

DISCUSSION

Do you think it would:

a) get processed into ore b) cause the grinder to get jammed c) explode and cause massive damage to the orion

Edit d) ground up but exhausted out the back

Posted Dec 2, 2017, 5:58 AM UTC · edited

1225
maplealvonGrand Admiral•

fighter sized ship high-yield rock shaped like a fighter

32
DocNitro•

You could expect a grinder like that to be heavily reinforced, because even rocks could have volatile components, and you wouldn't risk c to happen while operating with genuine rocks.

8
Wilhell_OP•

So you think C unlikely?

3
DocNitro•

Exactly.

3
GodwinWUniversalist•

Agreed, I would bet D. It's not for nothing that the Reclaimer is really different. That one can grind ships for profit. The Orion would should not be able to do this really. Maybe you get a bit of metal, but compared to a Reclaimer I bet you lose 90% of the value.

1
Stehlik-Alit•

C is exactly what would happen. Infact thats the example cig has given. For that matter, thats at the core of the discussed mining mechanic.

You have to use scanners to identify materials, and cut out gas pockets that could explode damaging your ship if consumed. Alternately avoid substances that could react with the expensive minerals and make them worth less.

Edit; to continue, thats why youll have to strip a ship prior to throwing it inbthe back of a reclaimer. A live power plant being processed would be bad

1
drizzt_xThere are some who call me... Monk?•

Another great Orion question: what would happen to a fighter sized ship that you "accidentally" pointed the mining beam at?

7
SC_TheBursarWing Commander•

For the life of me I do not remember where I saw it, but they want mining lasers and combat lasers to be fundamentally different. You cannot mine by pew pewing an asteroid with normal fighter lasers and the mining laser doesn' really have combat damage assigned.

That said the statements were made a long time ago as hypotheticals in the discussion I saw and who knows how it will really play out in final version.

4
Wilhell_OP•

Truly something that must be tested.

Perhaps the most interesting results will be from accidentally hitting the fighter with the beam before it falls into the grinders. very nasty accident indeed.

3
drizzt_xThere are some who call me... Monk?•

^ New York Italian accent: It would be such a terrible thing if anything was to happen to your nice ship - like maybe it accidentally got in the way of a mining beam and fell into a grinder, and maybe you were accidentally in it."

7
Wilhell_OP•

Exactly. You remember that guy jumpin claims out on the asteroid fields of Yela? Yeah that guy had an accident, real dangerous business is mining. you see, he flew into a mining laser on an Orion and before anyone could help he went straight through the grinders. Better be careful where you mine ya know?

6
ragingatworkScout•

for science!

1
Solus_Vael•

Well......only one way to find out.

1
Wilhell_OP•

This is something we need to do when the Orion get into the verse.

You know that org mate who always afk's when their supposed to be keeping watch...

1
Solus_Vael•

Exactly.

1
Knarfdarf•

Now I just wait for the first guy to "weaponise" a Orion for ramming.

1
Liudeius•

Well the Orion can't be a better salvager than the Reclaimer.

I would say it jams. The drill is made for rock, not strong hull metal.

0
manipulat0r•

It's made to process tungsten, titanium and chromium - what strong hulls are you talking about?

7
Liudeius•

Can people not tell the difference between unrefined metal and refined metal?

0
Vargralor•

Should be fine to reprocess an Origin 300 series ship then.

1
drizzt_xThere are some who call me... Monk?•

^ This. I would assume it jams as it is meant to handle raw ores, not processed and tempered metals, which are generally much stronger.

Then again, it sort of depends on the size of the ship and the size of the grinders. P52? Probably scrap. Cutlass? Jammed.

0
[deleted]•

[deleted]

1
WikiTextBot•

Niven's laws

Niven’s laws were named after science fiction author Larry Niven, who has periodically published them as "how the Universe works" as far as he can tell. These were most recently rewritten on January 29, 2002 (and published in Analog Magazine in the November 2002 issue). Among the rules are:

Never fire a laser at a mirror.

Giving up freedom for security is beginning to look naïve.


^[ ^PM ^| ^Exclude ^me ^| ^Exclude ^from ^subreddit ^| ^FAQ ^/ ^Information ^| ^Source ^| ^Donate ^] ^Downvote ^to ^remove ^| ^v0.28

0
The-Juiceman•

Just stick with rock and ore. Repair costs will be real. Reclaimer for processed metals.

0
dijicaekScout•

Explode and glitch out the physics of the Orion.

0