[deleted]•
2
[deleted]•

And these idiots think that it's ok to break the law if it's to obtain 'evidence' ....

"okay what is stupid is that you have to have consent to prove you are recording them. Okay it isn't stupid BUT if you need to spy on your spouse/babysitter, you should be able to..especially when you need evidence."

1
Kuonji•

Did you see this little gem of a comment?

"What kind of a person he was for the ex-wife to get proof - even if it is illegally received. Interesting!"

1
[deleted]•

“I believe the tape recording of Mr. Lewton by my client and her father provides a window that professionals and this court can use to see where this child should be placed,” Bianco said.

I agree! Though, it's a window into the morality of the mother rather than the father. Putting her child in the middle of their divorce like that isn't healthy for the girl.

1
[deleted]•

And somehow she is the one with primary custody.

1