FunFair's token supply

I'm trying to better understand FunFair's token supply/ICO model.

During the ICO they set a hard cap of 3 billion FUN tokens (Phase 1 had a hard cap of 1 billion and Phase 2 sold x3 the total amount sold in Phase 1), which was met. Please correct me if this not correct.

  • For every $1 USD there were 166 2/3 FUN tokens created
  • 100 FUN tokens went to the contributor and the remaining 66 2/3 FUN tokens were divided among the Founders (37.5%), Advisors (2.5%).

 

I'm curious what the remaining 60% will be used for. Are these the tokens that casinos would purchase and would they be offered at a discounted rate? Also, is it common for companies to use a service like New Alchemy for the ICO?

 

On marketcap I see the total FUN supply is ~10 billion but in circulation is only around 5 billion. I assume that creating of 66 2/3 tokens for every 100 + the bonus Trench periods = the total supply (from 3 billion FUN tokens issued to the public).

Posted Mar 5, 2018, 2:44 PM UTC

129
usuallyrealistic•

Yep, here you go. Directly from the October company update (https://funfair.io/funfair-company-update-16th-october-2017/):

Replacement strategy for Phase 2 token sale.

After our oversubscribed Phase 1 token sale back in June, we had intentions of a second / phase 2 sale during September/October that would sell the bulk of the 11B tokens that we had issued and allocated for this occasion.

Instead, due to a combination of factors; regulatory, commercial and legal issues including a highly changing world marketplace – we’ve decided to scale back our token sale and cancel the original Phase 2 plan as originally envisaged.

We’ve decided to spread out the sale over a longer period of time (five years), so that instead of selling almost 11B tokens in one go this October, we’re going to limit it to 1B tokens each year, for nearly five years. In addition, we reserve the right to burn further tokens if we decide they’re not required at the end of 2018 and each subsequent year.

The new plan will provide suitable liquidity (for product investment or M&A) over the long term, at a significant lower issuance rate, rather than do it all at once with the large issuance of circulating tokens that the previous plan had entailed.

So to summarise:

We’re allocating 1.4% of the 11.173B tokens (0.16B) immediately to the circulating tokens that will become company assets. This raises the current amount of circulating tokens from 3.84B to 4.00B (4%), and allows the company to incentivise new hires, to spend FUN tokens on some contractors who wish to be paid that way, and to fund and incentivise outside companies accordingly where they wish to be paid in FUN instead of in cash. We prefer contractors to be aligned with our interests and paying them in FUN is a good way to do this. CoinMarketCap was informed of this change last month and the circulating token number has been correctly reported for the last couple of weeks at 4.00B.

We’re allocating 42% of the 11.173B tokens (4.7B) that we’re putting into cold storage and will restrict token sales to a max of 1B per year for four years, and an additional 0.7B tokens for the fifth and final year. These tokens will be sold to institutions or large token buyers to minimise overheads and retain highest compliance, via OTC and market trading. The tokens will be sold as close to market price as possible, to minimise dilution and maximise value.

And finally…

We’re allocating 55%, the majority of the 11.173B tokens, to be burned. This equates to 6.173B tokens that will all be burned on October 18th (now we are clear of the Metropolis’ Byzantium hard fork) at 3pm GMT (4pm British Summer Time).

Burning tokens has the effect of taking them out of issuance. They will never become circulating tokens and so every other token holder benefits proportionally due to additional scarcity.

The tokens will be sent to the infamous burn address of 0x0, and the token contract will automatically reduce the total number of tokens from 17,173,696,075.7222 to 11,000,000,000 in the ‘Total Supply’, as detailed on Etherscan and ERC20 reporting tools.

The Burn mechanism we’re using for this has been in-built into the token contract since day one, and will demonstrate the effectiveness of burning tokens that can be accomplished on the live platform. To remain compliant with regulations where our intention is to burn tokens that have been used as fees (in a consumptive way like tickets for transit), we intend to take additional advice but should this prove problematic for compliance, we’ll work on alternative strategies prior to first use.

5
areakaOP•

Thanks for the info. I had no idea phase 2 had been replaced and am approaching this with a very limited finance background. Do you know what kind of regularly/compliance issues they were facing?

Not saying this is good or bad thing but I thought all the rules of the ICO were coded into a smart contract making it “impossible” to change once live. I’m a big FUN supporter but it seems a little weird to me that they could so easily change the amounts allocated and distribution schedule when this has already been so clearly defined.

If FUN tokens are considered company assets, does that mean holders have some voting power/ownership in FunFair’s operation?

1
[deleted]•

[deleted]

5

There was a legal reason they stated. First of all it would trigger a tax event for US citizens if they suddenly got "free" tokens.

The biggest reason they stated was China regulations however, back when phase two was supposed to happen China regulations where the big next thing and it was unclear how legal the phase two plan was. The stopped it for that reason.

Token dilution was also a weakness in the plan.

For a holder it didn't matter. Maybe they where even better of. Phase two could have decreased your cut of the pie. Now phase two is cancelled and a big chunk was burned, you got a bigger piece of the pie.

3
areakaOP•

Isn't the average US citizen barred from participating in an ICO? From the update it sounds like they're still a little uncertain about the legality of token burns.

1

Yeah but nobody can stop them doing anyways. It's their responsibility, FUN's terms of agreements said they weren't allowed, but they also didn't have to do KYC.

What update? The October one? I don't read any uncertainty in that and if they were they would not initiated a burn. That would be reckless and stupid. Not their style.

1
Auspreneur•

No they’re not shares. The tokens they own are company assets like the token you own are your assets.

2

See October company update.

2