Response to "It's time we as a community moved away from Bitcoin" Part 1 of 2.

FOCUSED DISCUSSION

This is written in response to the post titled "It's time we as a community moved away from Bitcoin" by u/MrCrickets

PART 1 of 2

“To everything there is a season, and a time to every purpose under heaven” - Ecclesiastes

In December 2017, a huge influx of first-time cryptocurrency speculators began entering the space and populating cryptocurrency subreddits. The Bitcoin bull run captured international media attention which sparked a craze and ignited Bitcoin FOMO on an unprecedented scale. The price of Bitcoin skyrocketed, and for those who entered on the tail end of the bull run, the kind of massive returns being advertised in the media seemed already out of reach. But what many soon discovered was a nascent market that held the promise of recreating the boom for those that missed out: altcoins.

The altcoin bull run was a direct result of the massive influx of new purely-speculative investment in Bitcoin. This new speculative class was previously unaware of cryptocurrency, held no allegiance to Bitcoin itself, and was itching to filter into other areas promising higher risk/reward bets. By January 2018, alts had become the next craze, and due to the snowball effect of speculative hype, the new sure thing.

Since this alt boom was largely based on speculative investment, it was followed, as are all hype cycles, by a bust. The market had been kicked into overdrive, running entirely on fumes for about a month and a half until finally sputtering out and coming to a stop, despite the makeshift rocket boosters (ICO's) that had been frantically rigged up in the meantime.

This demonstrated a return of rationality into the market. But there was a problem: the millions of speculators who fomobought under the pretense of easy returns were left holding bags, and dreams of wild gains touted only weeks before were dashed. They had been promised a new low risk/high reward era, but in reality they had simply bought the top.

During the boom, the speculators poured into Twitter, Reddit, Youtube and other social media. At first these outlets were useful as a way to become informed about investments, but as the influx grew, the demographic of the space was radically altered, and the center of discourse shifted to the perspective of the speculators themselves. The dominant narratives emerging from this coalition, having been derived from speculation, were focused on promotion. This pushed the overall discourse to become more incentive-driven, creating a feedback loop of overlapping mini hype-cycles. Shilling became a universal practice, nearly indistinguishable from unaligned discussion. A nascent belief in “altcoinization” had emerged, gestated by an implicit "a rising tide lifts all boats" mentality.

Though the alt season is now over, this condition is left intact. The speculative class’ first taste of crypto was a boom, followed by an even bigger boom. The impression formed during this hyperbullish period is of a New Normal. And the alt boom narratives, instead of being destroyed by the bear market, have instead been put on perpetual life-support. They cannot be discarded, because the speculative class is financially bound to their validity. Altcoinization has become dogma, and its adherents await the Return. Like all dogmas, altcoinization is reactionary (this is not specific to altcoins). When the narratives of the tribe are challenged, a common enemy inevitably emerges as a rallying point. Something that represents a threat to their survival and prosperity. For the neo-altcoiners, this is Bitcoin.

The hyperspecialization of altcoins is so powerful because it parallels the general movement of human societies away from centralized administration and towards individual sovereignty. The disruption/peer economy, the upending of the traditional political spectrum and political multipolarity, the rejection of gender roles, the Internet, multiculturalism, Postmodernism are all expressions of this trajectory in human networks. As humanity scales up and peer-to-peer communication and collaboration become better and more accessible, the recent generations see a shift in our expectations towards a system that increasingly focuses on individual needs, creating space for everyone to realize their unique potential.

But the superabundance of resources created to that end has a negative side as well. No matter what your alignment, identity, preference; one feels entitled to its realization. This sense of entitlement finds perfect expression in speculative Altcoinization. Altcoins (particularily ICO’s) serve to cater to entitlement culture’s inexhaustible appetite for products that “represent” individuality and create new value. The hyperspecialization of brands seeks to exploit the multiplicity of needs, wants and tastes. Micro-hierarchies are formed, prompting consumers to cultivate brand loyalties. Consumption becomes personal, and brands become pseudo-identities. To this end, altcoinization is a vehicle for consumerism to finally muscle its way into money itself. We had beanie babies in the 90’s, Pokemon cards in the 00’s, and now we have ICO’s. What qualities do all these share in common? Uselessness, collectability, hype, and a short shelf life.

Altcoins during the boom became a game. A massively-multiplayer online game of unprecedented reach. Players are awarded monetarily for their proficiency and endurance; the interfaces are complex, powerful, and even beautiful (the Binance iOS app is exemplary). But what makes altcoin speculation possibly the greatest game of all time is its immersiveness; the game functions in a subdomain of the real economy, and so real-world events are subsumed within it. It has sprouted unique cultural codes and memeology. It harnesses all the faculties of desire, suspicion, foresight, intuition, and mastery that make gaming addictive and FUN. Altcoins, like games, like shopping, are useful for one, eternal, overriding purpose: producing dopamine.

So next time someone makes a spirited call for the community to rise up in defense of their altcoin bags against the evil scapegoat Bitcoin, remember the impulse that motivates them.


Part 2 will be posted soon. It focuses on Bitcoin and the Lindy Effect. I even have nice things to say about my favorite punching bag, Bitcoin Cash (spoiler alert: at the protocol-level it is the best existing cryptocurrency after Bitcoin)

Posted Mar 9, 2018, 10:55 PM UTC · edited

623
nineonetwoonethrowRedditor for 11 months.•

Implying that altcoins are all just currencies with no use other than p2p transfer of value...

i'll take my MOD/VEN/IOTA over Bitcoin, which gets 90% of it's value from people fomoing

5
paintedfrogOPRedditor for 7 months.•

This issue will be covered in part 2

0
nineonetwoonethrowRedditor for 11 months.•

Got it :) will part 2 mention token-shares? The only example I have really is MOD, which if you're not familiar with it, it's akin to a dividends-paying share in a company, and won't rely on the price of BTC at all, rather the payout per token * x amount of years

3
paintedfrogOPRedditor for 7 months.•

No, but I do respect your grind :)

1
bstr3kRedditor for 5 months.•

where is tldr version?

3
paintedfrogOPRedditor for 7 months.•

Lol. Don't sell yourself short!

1
lihr__Redditor for 4 months.•

Interesting, I upvoted it. Yet, the parallel of ICOs with overnight sensations is a bit extreme. Sure, there is hype and most of them are pure trash, but I think the ICO financial mechanism is here to stay.

3
paintedfrogOPRedditor for 7 months.•

Fair. I get more in depth on ico's vs apps in part 2. I should really finish it!

1
lihr__Redditor for 4 months.•

I'll look forward to reading it

1
MadeToDisagreeWithUProgrammer•

I haven't even finished reading yet, but I want to say thanks for such an in-depth write up and quality content. Regardless of whether I agree or disagree with your sentiment, we need more quality content like this.

EDIT: I've got a few points to make after finishing reading.

The hyperspecialization of altcoins

Though the alt season is now over

Altcoins during the boom became a game

This sense of entitlement finds perfect expression in speculative Altcoinization

Altcoins (particularily ICO’s) serve to cater to entitlement culture’s inexhaustible appetite

The hyperspecialization of brands seeks to exploit the multiplicity of needs, wants and tastes

and finally, your actual point: FUD.

What qualities do all these share in common? Uselessness, collectability, hype, and a short shelf life

You started out great with this write-up, and I foolishly believed you were going to continue with simple observations and commentary when I commended your quality content. It quickly devolved into baseless FUD clearly driven by your own interests, which I assume are heavily tied into Bitcoin.

I understand your frustration at the fact you poured your hopes and dreams into bitcoin only to see it trumped by coins with actual use cases.

The altcoin boom is driven by a new technology solving old problems. It's that simple. What problem does Bitcoin solve that an altcoin does not solve in a more efficient manner? I know of none. I'm willing to bet you don't either. A 'store of value' is about as close to an actual use case you can get with bitcoin, and that's laughable as well considering the lack of intrinsic value.

Want to transfer funds peer-to-peer? Great! Stellar, XRP, and Nano are fantastic at doing so. Bitcoin is not.

Want to build smart contracts? Good luck with bitcoin.

Want to store user data on the blockchain and sell it to customers? Bitcoin doesn't do that either.

Certifications and assurances are dodgy currently, and blockchain can help this! Bitcoin does not. VeChain does.

I can continue as long as necessary, but it's really not necessary at all. I don't think your intention was to have actual discourse, your intention was to spread altcoin FUD because you're afraid of Bitcoin going the way of the dodo. Bitcoin was essential to the initial growth of cryptocurrencies just as AOL was essential to the proliferation of internet use. Their job is done. The internet is here to stay, and has been improved upon since the days of AOL. Crypto and blockchain are here to stay, and Bitcoin is to thank for that... but it has also been improved upon since the days of Bitcoin.

3
paintedfrogOPRedditor for 7 months.•

Thanks! It was downvoted to 25% in the first 3 minutes ha ha. Agreed about the need for quality content, I've been trying to put more effort in.

1
MadeToDisagreeWithUProgrammer•

I added my criticism after you posted this and that feels a little dirty on my end. I'm sorry, that wasn't my intention.

Still appreciate the quality content even though I ended up disagreeing with it!

2
paintedfrogOPRedditor for 7 months.•

That's no problem. Pretty much every post of mine is met with similar digs at my intentions and character, I'm used to it! I'm still drafting part 2 which speaks to the issues you bring up here about alt use cases vs BTC.

But I will say three things

  1. that Satoshi in an email to Wei Dai suggested that Bitcoin would eventually support smart contracts (Satoshi might not have been aware of Nick Szabo's term). But his focus at that time was on the value transfer function, and then he disappeared. By that time Ethereum had taken off. Bitcoin can and will eventually implement smart contracts, and one of the contentions I make in pt 2 is it will outstrip Ethereum as a sc platform, while also being a store of value as well as a functioning p2p currency.

  2. A second quick point about the Arpanet and routing. The first routers (IMPs) were introduced to solve the interoperability problem. Computers at the time used proprietary machine languages that were incompatible with each other, so the IMPs, which used a standard language, represented a hub between each incompatible node, allowing the diferent computers to speak to each other as through an interpreter. This interoperability issue is the main failure point for altcoins imo. I contend in pt 2 that the settlement layer of Bitcoin will be the "hub" that altcoin functionality will be transferred to in the form of second-layer applications. Maybe not VeChain which features a proprietary hardware component, but I'd wager 95% of existing altcoin use cases will become applications on the Bitcoin network. A million asymmetrical blockchains running independent networks is an unlikely future. Bitcoin is an ongoing, long term project that will never be "complete" only continually optimized and built up. Nano, for example, has no intention of implementing smart contracts at all, if they are even possible over the nano network. By the time cryptocurrency value transfer is actually in demand in the real economy, Nano will be a single use-case dinosaur when everything else does the same thing, only without sacrificing decentralization.

  3. Re: AOL. You may want to rethink that analogy, as Bitcoin is a protocol, not a company or website. I suggest looking up the 'internet protocol suite'. 40 year old technology we still use today. I cover the Lindy Effect in pt 2 which is a counter to your premise that newer is always better

Thanks again for your response!

2
MadeToDisagreeWithUProgrammer•

Pretty much every post of mine is met with similar digs at my intentions and character, I'm used to it!

Huh. That made me think about my approach and what I think it says about me. Thanks for that, and I really do mean the thanks. The character attacks say more about myself than you.

  1. If that happens I'll gladly join the team, but I honestly don't see bitcoin outpacing the 'second-wave' of cryptocurrencies that are born with the benefit of hindsight from Bitcoin's shortcomings. I'm looking forward to seeing your second part, perhaps it'll convince me otherwise. That's exciting! Do you think PoW will continue to be used?

  2. What would make bitcoin preferable to a platform like Ethereum in the case that altcoins need a central 'hub'? (Especially PoS Ethereum if it does end up coming through.)

On that same note, what about an oracle like ChainLink or Oraclize? In Nano's case especially, perhaps a more modular approach is best in the blockchain space. One payment network to rule them all that communicates via oracle with one smart contract network to rule them all... UNIX style. Surely if it's plausible for bitcoin to be reworked to such a level that it's completely divergent from the original peer-to-peer payment path, a UNIX-style system is also plausible, if not preferential.

  1. I wasn't intending for AOL to be an all-encompassing analogy... just one to suit the purpose of that particular context. AOL brought internet usage to the mainstream, and Bitcoin arguably did the same thing for public blockchains enabling peer-to-peer value transfer. Just as AOL was eventually beaten out by improved technology, Bitcoin shall be as well. I believe a handful of the altcoins are the improved technology to beat Bitcoin.

All in all, I think you've proved me wrong what I assumed to be your intentions and thank you for the discussion!

2
taipalagInvestor•

Nice article, pal, I enjoyed reading it...

2
paintedfrogOPRedditor for 7 months.•

My man!

2
[deleted]•

[deleted]

1
cryptoshillRedditor for 7 months.•

Great read, thank you.

0
paintedfrogOPRedditor for 7 months.•

Thanks for reading!

0
mr_li_jrRedditor for 9 months.•

Good post. I agree with most of it. Pretty harsh on altcoins and altcoiners, but 99% of the time it's deserved.

0
paintedfrogOPRedditor for 7 months.•

Thanks! I do back some alts. But yeah 99% seems like a pretty accurate figure lol

0
DEPOT25KAPRedditor for 9 months.•

Hey, any chance you'd like to ghost write for me, lol. In all seriousness great post awesome quality. Many of the points you outlined I've tried to explain to friends even to fellow redditors but I lack the vocabulary. It's great to see that I am not too lost in the endless sea of information. I will definitely be anticipating and searching for your next post.

0
paintedfrogOPRedditor for 7 months.•

Wow thanks, much appreciated. I'll try to post the next part tomorrow sometime

1