Pick up Sherman and trade tru for earl Thomas make any sense?
Even though I have some doubts about Sherman getting back top tier
Posted Mar 9, 2018, 11:54 PM UTC
015
Why do you guys want 2 players that are aging? Tru is fine. He had a down year after being the best before injury the year before. I don't get it honestly. Our team is fine. We need another great o lineman and a 3 wr a TE that can catch and thats it. D was fiund last year and DQ will get then top 5 this year. We dont need shermam or thomas.
9
He’s aging sure, but he’s not just some dude off the street he’s one of the best corners of the generation, and arguably of all time. He knows DQ’s system and has a rapport. If we had the cash I don’t see why we wouldn’t. Plus we need the depth with losing jalen Collins
0
Achilles injuries are NO JOKE and take a WHILE to heal, ESPECIALLY for corners.
2
Here I am wondering why people are so in love with Sherman. In the Falcons sub of all places.
4†
If you can get him cheap why not get him. Coming off an injury he isn’t gonna be able to demand much
2
Or probably play much
2
That being said he’s still better then our whole core, save trufant
-1
Nah... makes zero sense
3
Why wouldn't Seattle have just kept Sherman instead of doing that trade?
1
Pass on Thomas. We should be all over Sherman though.
1
I love Thomas but wouldn't trade Trufant for him.
1
No, what do you do with Allen then?
We have a young D, there is no reason to make it older and more expensive than it needs to be when its arguably better now.
This is true and Allen did take a huge step this year.
I agree but Allen is a FA.
Hea restricted though and can be tendered for cheap or a good pick. He isnt gone unless we want him to be and Earl is due a contract soon. Hes ready bitching about it.