[Banned] /r/California/: The Government’s Case Against California’s ‘Sanctuary’ Policies Is on Weak Legal Ground | American Civil Liberties Union

I was banned from r/California/. Here's what I would have said in response to this post:

When I first saw this article from aclu.org, its title was:

The Government's Case Against California's 'Sanctuary' Policies Is on Weak Legal Ground

Here are some other articles about this story:

• mercurynews.com: Trump to visit his nemesis California, the US economic engine
• sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com: Ahead Of Trump Wall Tour, Little Change On US-Mexico Border
• Bloomberg: California Sanctuary Law Should Withstand Trump Challenge
• Politico: Trump administration: Moving 'sanctuary' lawsuit to San Francisco 'makes no sense'
• talkingpointsmemo.com: Trump Heads To State He Loves To Hate For 2020 Cash, Border Wall Prototypes
• ABC News: The Latest: Activists say Trump not welcome at the border
• Los Angeles Times: Trump in California: Region prepares for president to make first trip here since 2016
• mercurynews.com: 'Bridges, not walls:' Brown invites Trump to…
• sfchronicle.com: Political notebook: Brown invites Trump to visit Calif. high speed rail project
• Bloomberg: Ahead of Trump Wall Tour, Little Change on US-Mexico Border
• The New York Times: A Visit Behind the Lines: President Trump Heads to California
• ocregister.com: Rhetoric aside, Jeff Sessions suing California will test limits of states' rights
• sfgate.com: California governor says Trump's upcoming visit should focus on bridges, not the wall
• The Daily Caller: Border Wall Would Pay For Itself By Cutting Welfare Use By Illegal Immigrants
• Los Angeles Times: On the eve of Trump's visit, state lawmaker proposes cutting tax breaks for companies that help build border wall
• Yahoo Finance: Despite heated rhetoric, little change on US-Mexico border

I am a bot trying to encourage a balanced news diet.

These are all of the articles I think are about this story. I do not select or sort articles based on any opinions or perceived biases, and neither I nor my creator advocate for or against any of these sources or articles. It is your responsibility to determine what is factually correct.