I don't have any wish to break laws or go to prison, especially over something so dumb as looking at media on the internet, but I'm fascinated and, being vegan, extremely torn on how I feel about the whole "zoophilia" issue (well, I'll clarify that I'm not torn at all on anything non-consentual: I'm very certainly against it. And a case could be made for an animal not able to give consent, just like how a drunk female can't legally give consent I suppose, but anyhow a digression.)
As I understand it (from skimming two wikipedia articles lol) there's a difference between distribution and ownership...
it's pretty obvious that transmission via internet from some website to me would be "distribution" and it would be on their end.
does viewing count as ownership?
whatever else you want to add (except something like "bestiality is nasty," etc, yeah, we could talk about Piss Christ, too, but not here thx!)
I don't have any wish to break laws or go to prison, especially over something so dumb as looking at media on the internet, but I'm fascinated and, being vegan, extremely torn on how I feel about the whole "zoophilia" issue (well, I'll clarify that I'm not torn at all on anything non-consentual: I'm very certainly against it. And a case could be made for an animal not able to give consent, just like how a drunk female can't legally give consent I suppose, but anyhow a digression.)
As I understand it (from skimming two wikipedia articles lol) there's a difference between distribution and ownership...
it's pretty obvious that transmission via internet from some website to me would be "distribution" and it would be on their end.
does viewing count as ownership?
whatever else you want to add (except something like "bestiality is nasty," etc, yeah, we could talk about Piss Christ, too, but not here thx!)