Samuel and the Prophetical Office, Lecture XVIII: Samuel (part 2)
by Arthur Penrhyn Stanley, D.D.
Let us take these points in their order.
To mediate between the old and the new. - This,
as I have before intimated, was indeed the
peculiar position of Samuel. He was at once
the last of the Judges and the inaugurator
of the first of the Kings. Take the whole of the nar-
rative together; take the story first of his opposition,
and then of his acquiescence, in the establishment of
the monarchy. Both together bring us to a just im-
pression of the double aspect in which he appears; of
the two-sided sympathy which enabled him to unite
together the passing and the coming epoch. The
misdemeanors of his own sons - the first appearance
in them of the grasping avaricious character which
in later ages has thrown so black a shadow over the
Jewish character - precipitated the catastrophe which
had been long preparing. The people demanded a
king. Josephus describes the shock to Samuel's mind,
"because of his inborn sense of justice, because of
his hatred of kings, as so far inferior in the aris-
tocratic rule, which conferred a godlike character on
those who lived under it." For the whole night
he lay, we are told, fasting and sleepless, in the
depths of doubt and perplexity. In the visions of
that night, and the announcement of them on the
following day, is given the dark side of the new in-
stitution. On the other hand, his acceptance of the
change is no less clearly marked in the story of his
reception of Saul. In the first meeting no word is
breathed to break the impression that God is with
the new Ruler, and, in his final coronation as king,
there is no check to the joy with which the whole
nation, and, according to the Septuagint, Samuel him-
self "rejoiced greatly." In the final address is rep-
resented the mixed feeling with which, after having
forewarned and struggled and resisted, he at last
bows to the inevitable course of events, and retires
gradually to make room for a new order, of which he
could but partially understand the meaning. He
parted from the people, not with curses, but with
blessings: "God forbid that I should sin against the
Lord by ceasing to pray for you ; but I will teach
you the good and the right way." He parted from
Saul, not in anger, but in sorrow. "Nevertheless
Samuel mourned for Saul." He who had begun by
denouncing the Monarchy as fraught with evil, ended
by becoming the protector and counsellor of him who
was to be its chief glory and support. Out of the
dark period in which his early years had been spent,
arose through his interposition a higher and a nobler
life. To Saul succeeded David and Solomon; and in
their reigns was seen a fulfilment of God's kingdom
such as could not be understood by those to whom
there was no king in Israel, who did what was right
in their own eyes; to whom the Psalms were as yet
unknown; to whom Prophecy came only by imper-
fect and distant glimpses; to whom the highest type
of the Messiah's reign in the person of David and his
son was a thing inconceivable.
Such an epoch of perplexity, of transition, of
change, as that which witnessed the passage from
the first age of the Jewish Church to the second,
has been rarely experienced in any age of the Church
since. Yet there have been times more or less simi-
lar; the passage from every generation to the one
that succeeds has difficulties more or less correspond-
ing. In every such passage there may be or there
ought to be characters more or less like that of
Samuel, if the transition is to be safely effected. Of
all the characters in the old dispensation, Samuel has
in later times, both by friends and opponents, been
the most often misrepresented and misunderstood. Of
all characters in later times, those who undertake the
difficult task of Samuel are the most likely to be
misunderstood or misrepresented still. They are at-
tacked from both sides; they are charged with not
going far enough or with going too far; they are
charged with saying too much or with saying too
little; they are regarded from either partial point of
view, and not from one which takes in the whole.
They cannot be comprehended at a glance like Moses
or Elijah or Isaiah, and therefore they are thrust
aside. There have been those who have trod the
same thankless path in former times of the Christian
Church. Athanasius, in the moderate counsels of his
old age, in his attempts to reconcile the contending
factions of Christians in the Council of Alexandria,
was, for this reason, fitly regarded by Basil as the
Samuel of the Church of his days. In later times,
even in our own, many names spring to our recollec-
tion, of those who have trodden or (in different de-
grees, some known, and some unknown) are treading
the same thankless path in the Church of Germany,
in the Church of France, in the Church of Russia, in
the Church of England. Wherever they are, and
whosoever they may be, and howsoever they may be
neglected, or assailed, or despised, they, like their
great prototype and likeness, in the Jewish Church,
are the silent healers who bind up the wounds of
their age in spite of itself; they are the good physi-
cians who knit together the dislocated bones of a
disjointed time; they are the reconcilers who turn
the hearts of children to the fathers, or of the
fathers to the children. They have but little praise
and reward from the partisans who are loud in indis-
criminate censure and applause. But, like Samuel,
they have a far higher reward, and the Davids who
are silently strengthened and nurtured by them in
Naioth of Ramah, - in the glories of a new age
which shall be ushered in peacefully and happily
after they have been laid in the grave.
In two important ways, this character of mediation,
if I may so call it, was discernible in the Prophetical
office generally, and, as far as we can see, was spe-
cially exemplified in Samuel.
First, we observe in his position and character that
independence of spirit which has sometimes
caused the Prophets, and himself in particular,
to be regarded almost as demagogues, the trib-
unes, of the Jewish people. The song ascribed to his
mother at his birth well expresses the new element,
which was in him to break out and run across the
usual tenor of Jewish society. "The bows of the
mighty men are broken, and they that stumbled are
girded with strength." "The Lord maketh poor and
maketh rich ; He bringeth low and lifteth up" Stern
rebuke of the popular will, stern defiance of regal
tyranny, stern denunciation of sacerdotal corruption
marked the entrance of the Prophetic dispensation
into the Church. To be above the world, to derive
courage and strength from a higher source than the
world, was the first guarantee for a due discharge of
the Prophetic mission. "There is none holy as the
Lord ; for there is none beside thee ; neither is there
any rock like our God."
But secondly, in Samuel as afterwards, this attitude
of solitary defiance was not the attitude of Priestly
interest or ambition. Of all the "vulgar errors" in
sacred history, none is greater than that which
represents the conflict of Samuel with Saul as
a conflict between the regal and sacerdotal power. It
is doubtful even whether he was of Levitical descent ;
it is certain that he was not a Priest. "Samuel Pro-
pheta fuit, Judex fuit, Levita fuit, non Pontifex, ne
Sacerdos quidem," is the just remark of S. Jerome.
And in accordance with this we may observe that
Samuel himself, after the fall of Shiloh, dwelt not at
Gibeon or Nob, the seat of the Tabernacle and the
Priesthood, but at Ramah. At Ramah, and at Bethel,
and at Gilgal, not at Hebron or Anathoth, were the
Prophetical schools. He reproved Saul the King, only
in the same way as, in his early childhood, he had
reproved Eli the Priest. The guilt of Saul's sacrifice
at Gilgal was not that it infringed on the province
of the Priest: Saul as king had the same right to
sacrifice as David and Solomon had afterwards. It
was that he in his rash superstition broke through
the moral restraint imposed upon him by the Prophet.
And in the yet more memorable scene, where Sam-
uel, as the stern executor of judgment on the
captive Agag, protests against the misplaced mildness
of Saul, his words rise far above the special occasion,
and contain the key-note of the long remonstrance
of the Prophets in all subsequent times against an
exaggerated estimate of ceremonial above obedience.
The very flow of the words recalls to us the form as
well as the spirit of Amos and Isaiah. "Hath the
Lord as great delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices
as in obeying the voice of the Lord? Behold, 'to
obey is better than sacrifice, and to hearken than
the fat of rams.' For the sin of witchcraft is
rebellion, and iniquity and idolatry are stubborn-
ness. . . . 'The Strength of Israel will not lie,
nor repent ; for He is not a man that He should
repent.' "
There is one more aspect in which Samuel's life
may be viewed. It was not merely as chief leader
of the People when the they passed into the second stage
of their national history, nor as the Founder of the
Schools of the Prophets, that he is especially known
as "Samuel the Prophet." It was because, unlike
Moses or Deborah, or any previous saint or
teacher of the Jewish Church, he grew up
for this office from his earliest years. He was "the
Prophet" from first to last. Even in his parentage,
we find a slight but significant indication of his prepa-
ration for it. His mother, as we have seen, was almost
a prophetess ; the word "Zophim", as the affix of his
birthplace Ramathaim, has been explained, not unrea-
sonably, to mean "seers," or "watchmen" ; and Elka-
nah his father is, in ancient Jewish tradition, called
"a disciple of the Prophets." This early education
for his office is, after all, the picture of Samuel most
familiar to our thoughts. It is not the terrible figure
which rose up before the apostate king in the cave
of Endor - the stern old man, ascending like a god
from the earth, with threatening and disquieted coun-
tenance, with the fearful aspect of him who had pre-
sented the mangled remains of Agag as a sacrifice at
Gilgal, who had called down thunder from heaven,
who had shaken off Saul from the skirts of that pro-
phetic mantle with which his face was veiled. It is
not this shape, grand and striking though it be, in
which Samuel usually rises to our recollections. It is
as the little child in his linen ephod, and in the little
"mantle" which his mother brought him from year
to year ; the child Samuel sleeping in the tabernacle
Shiloh, in the simple sleep of innocence, unknowing
of the sins which went on around him ; roused by
the mysterious voice, listening in deep reverence to
its awful message. This is the image of Samuel which
is enshrined to us in Christian art ; this is the image
which most appeals to our general sympathy, and on
which the Sacred Text lays the most peculiar stress.
On these early chapters of the Books of Samuel, we
are told that in his gentler moments Luther used to
dwell with the tenderness which formed the occasional
counterpoise to the ruder passions and enterprises of
his general life. Ever and anon amidst the crimes
and terrors of the narrative of that troubled time;
athwart the sins an corruptions of the Priesthood,
and the passions and the calamities of the nation, the
scene of the Sacred Story is, as it were, drawn back
and reveals to us, in successive glimpses, the one
peaceful, consoling, hopeful image, and we hear the
same gentle undersong of childlike, devoted, contin-
uous goodness. "His mother said, I will bring him
that he may appear before the Lord, and there abide
forever." "And she brought him into the House
of the Lord in Shiloh, and the child was young." And
she said, "For this child I prayed ; and the Lord
hath given me the petition which I asked of him.
Therefore also I have lent him to the Lord; as long
as he liveth, he shall be lent to the Lord. And he wor-
shipped the Lord there." "And the child did minister
unto the Lord before Eli the Priest." ("The sons
of Eli were men of Belial ; . . . and the sin of the
young men was very great before the Lord. . . . )
But Samuel ministered before the Lord, being a child."
"And the child Samuel grew before the Lord." ("Now
Eli was very old, and heard all that his sons did to
all Israel ; and said unto them, 'Why do ye such
things?' . . . Notwithstanding they hearkened not
unto the voice of their father, because the Lord
would slay them.") "And the child Samuel grew on,
and was in favor both with the Lord and with men."
("There came a man of God unto Eli and said . . .
Wherefore honorest thou thy sons above me, to make
yourselves fat with the chiefest of all the offerings
of Israel my people? And the child Samuel ministered
unto the Lord before Eli." "And Samuel grew and
the Lord was with him, and did let none of his words
fall to the ground, and all Israel from Dan to Beer-
sheba knew that Samuel was established to be a prophet
of the Lord."
It is this contrast of the silent, inward, unconscious
growth of Samuel, with the violence and profligacy
of the times, that renders this narrative the first ex-
ample, the first chapter, it may almost be called, of
the like characteristic of the history of the Christian
Church, in so many stages of its existence. It is also
the expression of a universal truth. Samuel is the
main example, as we have seen, of the moderator and
mediator of two epochs. He is, also, the first instance
of a Prophet gradually raised for his office from the
earliest dawn of reason. His work and his life are
the counterparts of each other. With all the recollec-
tions of the ancient sanctuary impressed upon his
mind, - with the voice of God sounding in his ears,
not, as in the case of the elder leaders and teachers
of his people, amidst the roar of thunder and the clash
of war, but in the still silence of the Tabernacle, ere
the lamp of God went out, - he was the more fitted
to meet the coming crisis, to become himself the cen-
tre of new institutions, which should themselves be-
come venerable as those in which he had been him-
self brought up. Because in him the various parts
of his life hung together, without any abrupt transi-
tion; because in him "the child was father to the
man," and his days had been bound each to each
by natural piety," therefore he was especially ordained
to bind together the broken links of two diverging
epochs; therefore he could impart to others and to
the age in which he lived, the continuity which he
had experienced in his own life; therefore he could
gather round him the better spirits of his time by
that discernment of "a pure heart, which sees through
heaven and hell." In that first childlike response
"Speak, Lord, for thy servant heareth," was contained
the secret of his strength. When in each successive
stage of his growth the call waxed louder and louder
to duties more and more arduous, he could still look
back without interruption to the first time when it
broke the midnight slumbers ; when, under the fatherly
counsel of Eli, he had obeyed its summons, and found
its judgments fulfilled. He could still, as he
stood before the people at Gilgal, appeal to the un-
broken purity of his long eventful life. Whatever
might have been the lawless habits of the chiefs of
those times, - Hophni, Phinehas, or his own sons, -
he had kept aloof from all. "Behold, I am old and
grey-headed, and I have walked before you from my
childhood unto this day. Behold, here I am; witness
against me before the Lord." No ox or ass had he
taken from their stalls; no bribe to obtain his judg-
ment, - not even so much as a sandal. It is this
appeal, and the universal response of the people, that
has cause Grotius to give him the name of the
Jewish Aristides. And when the hour of his death
came, we are told with a peculiar emphasis of expres-
sion that "all the Israelites," - not one portion or
fragment only, as might have been expected in that
time of division and confusion, - "were gathered to-
gether" round him who had been the father of all
alike, and "lamented him and buried him;" not in
any sacred spot or secluded sepulchre, but in
the midst of the home which he had consecrated only
by his own long unblemished career, "in his house at
Ramah." We know not with certainty the situation
of Ramah. Of Samuel as of Moses it may be said
"No man knoweth of his sepulchre unto this day."
But the lofty peak above Gibeon, which has long
borne his name, has this feature (in common, to a cer-
tain extent, with any high place which can have been
the scene of his life and death), that it overlooks the
whole of that broad table-land, on which the fortunes
of the Jewish monarchy were afterward unrolled.
Its towering eminence, from which the pilgrims first
obtained their view of Jerusalem, is no unfit likeness
of the solitary grandeur of the Prophet Samuel, living
and dying in the very midst and centre of the future
glory of his country.
Is it possible to evade or to forget the illustration
which this story derives from the experiences
of education everywhere? The venerable sanc-
tuary which Joshua had planted, and where
Eleazar had ministered, the monuments of which I
have before termed the mediæval age of the Jewish
Church, are but the likeness, many times repeated in
the Christian Church, - but nowhere more strikingly
than in England and in Oxford, - of the ancient seats
of education, the cathedrals, the monasteries, the col-
leges blended both together, where generation after
generation is trained for the future exercise of the
pastoral office. Under such auspices, both in the Jew-
ish and in the Christian Church, grow up Hophni and
Phinehas, the profligate son of Eli, and the blameless
youth of the child Elkanah. Sacred associations,
religious services, are as deadening and hardening to
the one, as they are elevating and purifying to the
other.
In this atmosphere, so charged with good and evil
for the future, not less impressive is the lesson of the
connection between Samuel's character and Samuel's
mission. Wild excesses in youth are often followed
by energy, by zeal, by devotion. We read it in the
examples of Augustine, of Loyola, of John Newton.
Sudden conversions of character such as these are
amongst the most striking points of ecclesiastical his-
tory. But no less certain is it that they are rarely, very
rarely, followed by moderation, by calmness, by impartial
wisdom. Count the eager partisans of our own or of
other times. How often shall we find that their early
discipline was one of headstrong and violent passion.
How often shall we find that the conversion of a law-
less and reckless youth issues in the one-sided and super-
stitious zeal which hurries the ark of God into battle,
after the example of Hophni and Phinehas, - which
would oppose to the death the erection of the monar-
chy and the rise of the Prophets, as Hophni and Phine-
has in all probability would have opposed it, had they
been converted and spared.
Whatever else is gained by sudden and violent con-
versions, this is lost. Whatever else, on the other
hand, is lost by the absence of experience of evil, by
the calm and even life which needs no repentance,
this is gained. The essential work of guiding, mod-
erating, softening, the jarring counsels of men is for
the most part the especial privilege of those who have
grown up into matured strength from early beginnings
of purity and goodness - of those who can humbly
and thankfully look back through middle age, and
youth and childhood, with no sudden rent or breach
in their pure and peaceful recollections.
Samuel is the chief type, in ecclesiastical history, of
holiness, of growth, of a new creation without conver-
sion ; and his mission is an example of the special mis-
sions which such characters are called to fulfil. In
proportion as the different stages of life have sprung
naturally and spontaneously out of each other, without
any abrupt revulsion, each serves as a foundation on
which the other may stand; each makes the foun-
dation of the whole more sure and stable. In propor-
tion as our own foundation is thus stable, and as our
own minds and hearts have grown up gradually and
firmly, without any violent disturbance or wrench to
one side or to the other ; in that proportion is it the
more possible to view with calmness and moderation
the difficulties and differences of others - to avail our-
selves of the new methods and new characters that
the advance of time throws in our way - return from
present troubles to the pure and untroubled well of
our early years - to preserve and to communicate
the childlike faith, changed, doubtless, in form, but
the same in spirit, in which we first knelt in humble
prayer for ourselves and others, and drank in the first
impressions of God and of Heaven. The call may come
to us in many ways ; it may tell us of the change of
the priesthood, of the fall of the early sanctuary, of
the rise of strange thoughts, of the beginning of a new
epoch. Happy are they who, here or elsewhere, are
able to perceive the signs of the times, and to an-
swer without fear or trembling, "Speak Lord, for thy
servant heareth."
from The History of the Jewish Church, Vol. I : Abraham to Samuel,
"Samuel and the Prophetical Office; Lecture XVIII: Samuel"
by Arthur Penrhyn Stanley, D.D., Dean of Westminster
Charles Scribner's Sons, New York, 1879, pp. 444-456
Posted Mar 29, 2018, 7:26 PM UTC
10