Argument:You CAN eat meat AS a vegan.

PREFACE: I'm 6 years vegan, diehard, and not going anywhere. But I'm thinking that perhaps there are more things we can be doing rather than simply boycotting factory farming.

"The Society now defines veganism as "A philosophy and way of living which seeks to exclude—as far as is possible and practicable—all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, animals for food, clothing or any other purpose."

Based of this, I'm going to make the statement "You can eat meat on a vegan diet, as long as your total actions over the year are promoting a vegan diet. (staying in the positive if it were a scale)"

Obviously not daily, or eating it from mcdonalds, but what if one were to hunt their own animals and use the energy from that to protest animal factories, spending a lot of money on vegan cheese and meats, and promoting the diet through social media or whatever other options they make.

I would even go as far as to say "vegetarians can not/will not eat meat; vegans can."

the real question here is "is Veganism a diet, or a lifestyle?"

Posted Apr 9, 2018, 12:27 AM UTC

122
N0TAD0CTOR•

It's a lifestyle, but it's not just about having a net positive effect. Even by the definition you gave, hunting an animal wouldn't be acceptable for a vegan except for in a life threatening situation.

11
beefdx•

Even by the definition you gave, hunting an animal wouldn't be acceptable for a vegan except for in a life threatening situation.

That's because the definition is bad though, not because hunting animals is wrong.

-1
saltedpecker•

Or the definition is good, which makes hunting animals bad.

7
beefdx•

If the definition is good, then the problem we face is figuring out what is the most possible and practicable means of helping animals, which likely means most "vegans" aren't actually vegans because they stop-short of doing the very most.

From this I would personally advocate changing the definition to suit a realistic approach to animal suffering, as opposed to walling yourself off from a reasonable and useful means of helping animals. As weird as it may seem, there are actually many situations where killing animals can save animals, and this also includes many situations where you eat the animals themselves.

1
DrPotatoSalad•

Unless your good actions require you to eat meat to do them, which they do not, then no.

The right a wrong you are arguing is fair when the wrong is regretted so you stop and do some good to "right the wrong." However, you are not regretting the action. Nor do you need to have meat to do the good. This is the a priori argument. You are taking your action and trying to rationalize why it is okay by any means. You cannot justify bad actions because you did good unless the bad actions are required to produce the good. The fact is one is a good action and one is a bad action. This reasoning can be used to justify just about anything.

Do you need the energy from an animal or expensive vegan foods, or can you just get it from cheap plants?

Veganism is a lifestyle and it is not a score board either. You should not look to others but rather to yourself. The point is to do the best you can.

7
MasterFunkOP•

I don't eat meat/dairy, as I said. This is purely a thinking exercise. "a priori" is interesting I'll look into it. :)

I heard a joke that if you converted 2 people to vegans, you could be carnist and be helping animals. It's obviously a joke, but Ann interesting way to think of karma as a baking system. Thanks for the reply

1
DrPotatoSalad•

I understand. The point being this mentality is basically the art of excuse making to justify heinous actions. A nurse could intentionally kill someone and then say they will save someone's life to make up for it, and then repeat the process.

A priori is number one here. It seems like it fits, but perhaps a different fallacy fits better.

2
MasterFunkOP•

very good analogy

2
[deleted]•

[deleted]

1
wifesabitch•

If you want to eat meat and be vegan, find roadkill or dumpster dive, you can't support animal agriculture and be vegan.

3
Megaloceros_vegan•

It's an ideology. Not a lifestyle. Not a diet. Vegans have many different lifestyles, many different diets, many different outlooks on life and all its issues. We share an ideology that says animals are not property, and they are not ours to exploit.

I, as a vegan, can eat meat. I quite enjoy the taste, actually. I choose not to eat meat for ethical reasons.

3
Xilmivegan•

I completely agree with the first paragraph here. It's an ideology!

One where you avoid causing unnecessary harm as much as you possibly can and not some kind of account-management where you count your positive actions as a currency to buy the permission to do negative ones once in a while.

1
beefdx•

I essentially created another topic discussing this point, and the bottom line you will find is that this definition of veganism is specious, and essentially excludes the lifestyles of most living vegans. Although it is important that this is the popular definition of veganism, the reality is that veganism is probably better seen as a philosophical position that desires to harm animals less to the extent where one feels comfortable doing so, with the intended goal of reducing this harm more so than you already do.

So as for whether or not it helps; yes, sourcing food from the most kill-free source would perhaps on paper harm the least animals, although admittedly there are a lot of complex variables on how you interact with the world so knowing just how much this helps is hard to quantify. Needless to say, I would argue that in some cases, eating meat is the moral imperative of vegans and not simply a taboo, although I also think most vegans I encounter are notoriously hypocrites.

2
[deleted]•

If you are helping out the vegan cause and eating meat, then you’re just a carnivore who happens to be helping out vegans. You wouldn’t be able to logically call yourself a vegan, but you’d still be doing some good in the world, so that’s cool.

Remember, you don’t need to be a vegan to help animals! It’s just logical that someone who wants to help animals would eventually become vegan. There’s no logical way to help an animal by murdering it and eating it, so there’s no way to be vegan and simultaneously do such a violent and selfish thing.

2
AutoModeratorMOD•

Thank you for your submission! Some topics come up a lot in this subreddit, so we would like to remind everyone to use the search function and to check out the wiki before creating a new post.


When participating in a discussion, try to be as charitable as possible when replying to arguments. If an argument sounds ridiculous to you, consider that you may have misinterpreted what the author was trying to say. Ask clarifying questions if necessary. Do not attack the person you're talking to, concentrate on the argument. When possible, cite sources for your claims.

There's nothing wrong with taking a break and coming back later if you feel you are getting frustrated. That said, please do participate in threads you create. People put a lot of effort into their comments, so it would be appreciated if you return the favor.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1
Neuwerld•

Veganism is definitely a lifestyle. Being vegan is about ALL animals and not just diet or farm animals.

I think you are also misinterpreting the vegan definition but it could be defined better. Vegans do not eat meat!

“as far as possible” means To the greatest extent, degree, or amount that is attainable. Eating meat is easily attainable. The only valid point I could understand is if your are unconscious, hurt or dying and doctors need to administer medicine that has animal products in it.

I liked the old definition better;

“Although the vegan diet was defined early on in The Vegan Society's beginnings in 1944, it was as late as 1949 before Leslie J Cross pointed out that the society lacked a definition of veganism. He suggested “[t]he principle of the emancipation of animals from exploitation by man”. This is later clarified as “to seek an end to the use of animals by man for food, commodities, work, hunting, vivisection, and by all other uses involving exploitation of animal life by man”.”

https://www.vegansociety.com/go-vegan/definition-veganism

1
the_V0lum3•

To state this is to claim that breeding an animal with the intent to kill it in its youth unnecessarily is not "cruel" yet if the same treatment were done to any human, or even a pet, it would be cause an outrage and be deemed cruel.

Of course this is cruel.

1
MasterFunkOP•

How effective is boycotting factory farming? How much money would one have to donate to vegan charities to make it equal? Is donating to charities effective?

Thanks! (Of course I've done my own research and have my own opinions, I'm just looking to build my debate skills :))

1
dalpha•

Animals were not put here for us to use to our advantage, any more than women were put here for men, or black people put here for white people. We can interact with animals, fight with them, kill them out of necessity, but it wrong wrong wrong to use them as meatbags, milkbags, or eggbags. Was that the necessity once upon a time? Sure. But it's not necessary now, so why the hell would a vegan want to eat meat 🍖 even only once?

1
Xilmivegan•

I completely disagree with your interpretation of "as far as is possible and practicable".

To me that doesn't mean "stay in the positive over the year". I'd say it's intended to mean something along the lines of: "unless you'd starve otherwise".

Don't be surprised, when I say that I don't really believe you that you are a 6 years vegan, when you try to bend the definition in a way that would allow you to eat meat and still consider yourself a vegan. I mean... maybe by your own low standards of what veganism means.

1
MasterFunkOP•

First of all, that's ad hominem. And a little rude. I don't have to prove (or do I have a way to prove) to you that I am quite a die-hard vegan. I recently went 6 months traveling asia and oops! i had about 2.5 eggs and maybe some fish sauce snuck into some of my food. But other than that, zero cravings, zero slip ups. I'm actually quite lucky with my friends/family being so accepting of veganism even if they're themselves not vegan.

But no, after this long, there's nothing in the world that will get me to take advantage of another creature, whether it's for food or any other purpose, my veganism goes down further than the diet...

What I'm trying to do here is spur logical discussion to brush up on my debate techniques, you're helping me in a way by using the ad hom argument. It's very tricky to deal with people in real life using arguments like this, so the more practice I get the better. ;) (of course I use this information, like another poster mentioned that I was using the "a priori" fallacy and I learned something from that.

That said, even if I were what you thought I am, we should be nice about it. If there are people out there struggling with staying vegan after so long, maybe they need some help from their community and some positive reinforcement. :)

1
Xilmivegan•

Isn't it kind of expected that people will no longer perceive you as a vegan when you try to deceive them by acting like a carnist?

I'm pretty sure it cannot be a surprise for you that people react like I did.

1
MasterFunkOP•

Walk a mile in someone else's shoes before you judge/insult them, cause then you'll be a mile away and you'll have their shoes!!

1