I think the second is stronger than the first since it doesn't have the rhyme that the first has, and it seems like a more coherent thought. However, I would expand more in both cases, since there isn't really an overarching metaphor/comparison being made like in a traditional haiku, and the sentiments are too undeveloped/aren't biting enough to stand on their own.

These feel a tad bit to ambiguous for me. I think it’s fine to leave some things up to the reader to figure out, but there isn’t really much to picture. What might help are some concrete images, as they can give the reader a home to chew on.

Like someone mentioned, that rhyme in that first one kind of distracted me from what you might be trying to say. The second one connects the ideas of each line better and seems more whole rather than a train of thought that is a little hard for the reader to follow. 

>Goddammit, no way.
 
 
>moderate too
 
>Time to tell secrets.

Is it that?

Edit: idk what's wrong with me. I obviously don't know how to count syllables 

The second is a lot better. It tells a much deeper story and the rhyme of the first one stifles it just a tad. 

Explore some more language with the first. It can still rhyme but play with it some more and see what, if anything, you can change.

The Moderate Haiku Pair