[Spoilers C2E22] I'm a little confused about Shadowfell and Hexblade

[deleted]

He hasn't explicitly said she doesn't that I recall, but based on Vecna's presence in the Shadowfell and the way Matt has explained the Divine Gate, it would be strange for the Shadowfell to also be the Raven Queen's domain. Much like we saw with Sarenrae and Pelor, I'd wager most or all of Matt's deities just have their own plane/demiplane.

It's certainly possible, but all of the flavor so far feels more like a Far Realm/Great Old One/aberration theme IMO.

Mike Mearls actually did some talking about Warlocks, Paladins, and Clerics in various D&D Beyond 5e videos in promotion for The Xanathar's Guide to Everything.

Essentially, the same entity can have all three types of classes attached to them, instead the difference between the three is the level of connection/familiarity between the bestower and the player. A 5e Cleric worships a deity, but their magic is arcane in nature. They learn to wield powers that correspond to their deity from different churches. Different worships of the same god can wield magic that respect their faith in different ways, hence the different domains one god can have aspects for. The faithful can pray to their god and receive contact with them if acknowledged. If they pissed their deity off, they wouldn't lose their powers or anything, but they're connected with their deity through willing subservience.

A 5e Paladin worships an ideal as much as they do a deity, and their conviction gives shape to their divine powers. If their conviction faltered, they may fall, but their power never came from a god in the first place. They are inspired by a set of beliefs or a God's values, or some specific virtue or cause.

A 5e Warlock's bond with their patron, in contrast with the other two, is more personal. Direct contact with the Patron was involved. Either the Patron reached out and chose the individual, or the individual made a deal in direct conversation with their Patron, or some ritual the Patron used or had performed on them bound them to a Patron. In any case, the Patron granted some tiny piece of power hoping to get something in return. Once bestowed, it can never be taken away. The Warlock has magic forced into their blood forever, they made their direct deal with the Devil (so to speak) and now the power is theirs to wield however they wish.

Some Warlocks have already paid the "price" for their power when they received it precampaign. Some still have a debt that they must balance with their God/Patron, and will have to fulfill that debt or face their Patron's spite/wrath. Nonetheless, you can easily betray your Patron... just keep in mind what an angry Patron must be capable of if he could awaken powers inside you.

The only reason a God is not a common Warlock patron is because Gods often don't "need" anything and aren't likely to meddle in the affairs of one individual mortal in such a small and direct way. They're usually above such things, but not incapable.

In essence, for any given supernatural being, a Cleric of them is a devotee and student, a Paladin of them is an imitator/fanboy, and a Warlock is just a crazy uncle who you gave a small one-time loan to. Maybe Sarenrae wanted to honor the child of a cleric that served her faithfully in life, and thus placed one of their progeny under her protection when they came into harm and it became clear they had a magical destiny in store for them. Boom, Celestial Warlock who gained their power from Sarenrae.

That's what matters. That when a Warlock is involved, there was a direct connection that implies no continued need for a bond, whereas the Paladin and Cleric's devotions are more from afar and impersonal and yet more lifestyle defining/constant.

It's not that you're applying too much logic. You're applying restrictions that simply aren't there.

The Raven Queen can be a Warlock's patron

You misunderstand. She is possibly BEHIND THE FORCE. Not the force itself. Just read Xanathar's. Really. It's a published book.

That makes no sense. She's a God. She should have Paladins or Clerics.

And what prevents a god from having clerics, paladins and warlocks ?

I thought what distinguished a Warlock patron was precisely that it wasn't a God.

Well you thought wrong. There is nothing in any rulebook saying this. What distinguishes is the contract that exists between warlock and patron.

I always thought they were antagonistic.

Why ?

Like all the dark elves end up in Shadowfell and all the regular ones start off in Feywild.

If by dark elves you mean drow, they are not in shadowfell, they are in the underdark.

I assumed the Shadowfell was, by default, bad.

Again, why? The shadowfell is neither a good nor evil place. It simply is not. It's a shadowey, worn out place, yes, but this is not evil.

After all, why was Thar Amphala/Vecna in the Shadowfell?

This makes no sense. Why were XYZ in the shadowfell? Because they went there. Vecna was born in the prime material plane, and moved to many places. In fact, in 4th edition, Vecna was an enemy of the Raven queen.

Not only that, but even after ascending, he does not have a permanent base. He moves around from plane to plane. The fact that at any given point in time (something that only happened in critical role, mind you) should tell you nothing, unless the members of critical role themselves are also judged by it since at that time, they too were there.

But yes, if his patron was from the Nine Hells, that would be a worse level of bad

Again, not necessarily. All devils spawned in the nine hells are lawful evil. But that does not preclude entities in other planes from ALSO being lawful evil, and maybe even more so than those in the nine hells.

I think you should pick up the books and read. Heck, you might suddenly have your perspective thrown all over once you realize that not only is critical role taking a lot of artistic license on the nature of entities and planes, but also your view on the lore as written is also incorrect.