World War 3 Raw Gameplay First Look feat. LevelCapGaming
Posted Aug 22, 2018, 6:26 PM UTC
147156
Looks pretty good. Sound design is on point from the footage anyway.
Since the AAA developers have failed at bringing back WW2 multiplayer fps games. A step back to BF3-4 days could be very refreshing.
Just hope they nail a good release window.
62
I don’t see why BFV from a gameplay perspective is not a solid game. The gameplay looks way better than BF1. All of the solid parts of the game are being shadowed by people kicking and screaming that woman are in a WW2 video game. Especially since the reason they are in the game is because they made a character customization system that allows you to be female. None of that seems like a problem to me.
2†
I'm more interested in how Patrick Söderlund called every critic and idiot for not agreing with his SJW propaganda and told us to not buy the game. Guess he got what he deserved. Because why would you listen to your fans and do what they want when you can just go the opposite direction and tell them they're stupid.
17
SJW propaganda
This is where we differ. That's just not something I give one remote flying fuck about. Seriously? How many other games do you really care about the opinion of one of the designers? Literally thousands of others have worked on the project, he doesn't represent them all.
This is a WWII game, not a simulator.
7
Realistically, there is and should be a middle ground there because you can’t appeal to all fans and you probably shouldn’t blindly appeal to the loud minority before making sure it’s actually an improvement to everyone.
Definitely shouldn’t be a prick to people simply expressing criticism though.
5
Making a Battlefield game specially for a 2 years old daughter, insulting playerbase and distorting history is not a middle ground.
4
Because they were a bunch of idiots
2
I don’t really see how he got what he deserved. He just left the company before this game crashed and burned. If anything he got out at the right time before his sweet sweet 70 million salary got axed as punishment for this game presumably tanking because of outrage.
1
[deleted]
0
No, he told Nazis not to buy the game if they don't like it.
"Everyone who disagrees is a Nazi" - A Child's Guide to Political Discussion
5
I think what people want is more customization options for weapons. In BF1 it is very limited but i guess that's how it was in WW1.
10
But all gameplay changes for BFV are better no? Recoil patterns, limiting 3D spotting significantly, faster T2K. I’m more excited for that as BF1 was kinda fucked.
8
I think those changes are good especially the limited 3D spotting. Also limited ammo capacity to begin with.
2
Faster t2k in Bf5? Bf1 t2k was already pretty high. I get people like hardcore but jeez.
-2†
This whole "women in WW2" hyperbole around BFV is not all there is to it. The developers have completely forgot their PR department with their statements in social media. Some of the stuff they have posted/said is really out of line and has most definitely turned me away from the game, although I have enjoyed majority of Battlefield games since BF1942 AND I don't see having women in the game as bad (not big on historical accuracy anyway).
6
I'm 1000 times more bothered by Bethesda suing someone for reselling an unopened copy of one of their games then I am with dice being slightly rude when voicing an opinion. I'll get bfv, not buying fallout though.
3
I played the alpha and although it was difficult to tell due to my performance tanking because 8gb of ram, I didn't find it particularly interesting. The gunplay felt very generic compared to BF1.
1†
The gunplay felt very generic compared to BF1.
that doesn't make any sense. you can hardly get any more simpler and generic than bf1's dumb shooting. bf5 definitely improved in that aspect
6
shooting in bf1 felt fantastic, one of the crunchiest things i've ever played. the sound design was top-notch
-1
BF1 has the most generic gunplay lol
4
BF4 does, played that for a while and found it extremely boring
-3
Rather have recoil pattern compared to random spray pattern bs.
2
Alpha.....
1
Right, a representation of a game's core concepts
1
I dunno, the alpha was too boring. BF1 is more fun to play.
1
I just think Dice has been producing weak games for the past couple of years. BF4 was solid but that's when they started trying to cater more the the casual COD consumer. Its gone down hill from there.
0
I agree to some extent. But new gameplay changes make it more skill based?
1
Its more skilled based then BF1 but BF1 was very weak on skilled play being viable to do well.BFV is a bit better but its far from a skill based game.
2
People went apeshit over BF3 being "too casual" 😂🤣
1
Yeah I'm actually kind of intrigued now that I've seen this gameplay, the trailers we've got up until now seemed way more clunky than what this seems.
1
The sounds for weapons are awful...
1
People always complaining about the graphics: This comes from a relatively small studio and not a AAA developer. There are probably more people at EA/DICE working exclusively on the Frostbite tech than in this studio on the whole game.
47
Its also an alpha build. Already with way more kit and vehicle customization then you have in a battlefield game.
17
For me this game looks like a poor copy of bf4.
32
Same. It doesn't look bad, and I am interested in it, but it just doesn't look as good. Hopefully this isn't the case!
25
Anything's better than playing an EA game.
2†
Hahahah, good joke
1
Yep.
Bad Audio, look like a copy and paste job
1
It looks exactly like it. Even down to the overall blue hue.
-5†
That was BF3, but yeah I really get a BF3 vibe from this.
But then: Why not just play BF3 or 4..
2†
Already been playing BF3 and 4 for years, I want something new. Even if it looks similar to 4, WW3 looks 10x more appealing to me than BFV.
4
Why does it look more appealing than BFV?
5†
Because its on origin
1
That looks pretty good. Might be alternative for BV or other fpp games.
23
I agree. Looks a lot better than in the trailer released the other day.
5
I agree. Fingers crossed. We need other good big fpp titles on the market and other companies better than ea, ubi and valve ... Oh no, wait valve does not make proper games anymore lol
2
Not at all
2
You ain’t down with BFV fam. Looks like a good game.
-3
I'm interested.
I would be pretty happy if this was basically just BF2.5
15
"I would be pretty happy if this was basically just BF2.5"
Wise man. yeah, Imagine BF2 with just remastered graphics. wow.
7
I'm genuinely wondering why there aren't more Battlefield 2 knockoffs. That game had a great balance of realistic and arcade-y gameplay. It wasn't perfect, but you'd think that eventually one of the knockoffs would get it right.
-1
Im getting a real MAG vibe the ps3 game. I dont think this game is 256 players but idk like the shooting looks like it feel like MAG which is one of my all time favorite games anyway so its exciting actually
12
The game is only 64 players I believe. I didn’t even think about MAG and now I’m sad :(
9
I remeber mag also had full ps move support that was suprisingly good. Would love to see a vr hd remake.
1
We need MAG remastered like yesterday!!
1
I was thinking exactly that, along with elements of the first Homefront's multiplayer, which I enjoyed for what it was. Watching this was like a blend of both.
1
BF4 still looks and feels better. Biggest thing i cant get over in this games videos are clean, detailles textures of objects.
12
yeah clean look is a bit sad to see hope that changes before a full release.
BF4 indeed does look and feel better sadly that game is no longer adding anything to it anymore.
if BF4 was still being updated with at least maps i would probably still play it over this.
3
BF4 still looks and feels better.
no way! you mean a team with hundreds of millions of dollars, hundreds of employees, and one of the biggest publishers on the planet (who then put another whole studio dedicated to the game after launch) could produce a better looking game than a small Polish studio who have their game in alpha?
I'm shocked.
-14
The problem is that the game looks like a poor mans BF4. There was nothing special about it.
3
you should be, because half of the games your supercompanies make are crap. bf4 had bad launch, now i is probably best big map/many player fps out there.
and if you feel sorry that this company is small, and thats the reason you chose that game over better bf4, well thats your right.
0
So what?
They want to make a AAA game, it had better look the part
0
I have a soft spot for The Farm 51, and I hope they do well. This gameplay really shows they've come a long way from Necrovision which, for all of its flaws I still enjoyed.
11
wow, reading the comments here, ppl complain about the stupidest things these days lol
7
Looks a lot like Battlefield 4 alpha
6
Yep.
Straight up cash grab
1
This is a definite buy for me. I love the level of customization they are going for.
5
They really need to work on those reload animations, those look terrible.
4
Not to mention the rest of the map
1
[deleted]
4
because its new? potentionally new maps a game that may get contiuned support something that BF4 does not have or get anymore.
8
[deleted]
-1†
well not like there are not bland maps in BF3/4 to be honest. and its only one of (most likely many more maps to come)
also i like the idea of a free form lean function compared to BF4 only lean when near wall/cover. at least thats what this video implies.
having medkits instead of running around looking for a medic to jump health packs.
destruction I honestly have not really liked it since bad company 2. hell call of duty has no destruction (well besides windows/glass i guess) and that game still gets purchased a fuckton each year. at moment i do not need destruction in the game but it would be nice.
also BF4 is a old game that is no longer being updated. i do not know if you noticed but most arcade shooters coming out are either WW2 or Future warfare and both those settings are kind of boring to me.
sure i COULD go play BF4 but i have played that enough i want something new (and potentially have things added) and continued support alongside it being modern is perfect.
now if BF4 was still being updated with maps/guns/skins/etc then yeah i probably would not even consider this but since BF4 is no longer being updated or having things added to it. i am sorry but i do want more games coming out now that are not mil sims/ww2 or future warfare.
and so far if things go well this game seems to be filling the void left by COD and BF. even if its a mash of BF and COD to some extent.
so far looks promising. will it actually be good when i and many others play it? maybe maybe not.
3
Ironic given how much dlc bf4 was bombarded with. Free updates and patches im all for though as it doesnt make players feel like they are missing out.
I think the biggest reason for not playing bf4 besides being much more arcadey than ww3 is the fact its on origin.
2
I'm glad this will come out, need something fresh instead of BF4. Hopefully it will be good, gameplay looks great so far, but it needs some polishing imo. When will this come out? Any system requirements so far?
3
After watching the gameplay I am not sure, but it felt refreshing. So I will most likely take the chance and get it when it comes out. :)
2
People are complaining about how the game looks, but I think it looks great!
Especially, in how it doesn't have ginger female cyborgs running around the battle zone.
2
Dat sound...
2
I'm all in on this one. Skipping Battlefeels 5
2
Lol
0
This looks pretty sweet but i wish the maps had more hilly areas/incline on the ground. It all looks pretty flat.
2
Honestly, this looks fucking great. Really excited to follow this games development. Hopefully it scratches that battlefield 4 itch
Indeed, map design looks good. game plays like Battlefield 2 aka the best Battlefield. just the lack of destruction is a bit off putting for modern shooter.
Personally for me Insurgency: Sandstorm is the game that will scratch my itch. the studio already has experience with fps games and previous insurgency was quite great
Battlefield 2 is the crowning glory of the BF series. Amen.
Bad Company and 3 would like a word
Edit: I'm not saying it wasnt good people, I'm saying there are a couple out there that are great as well.
Not sure what it is about BC2, but it's a terrible "Battlefield" game. I might be a good FPS, but as far as Battlefield goes, it's missing so many elements that make Battlefield...well Battlefield.
How so?
No they wouldn't. Hardly any vets consider those even remotely as good as BF2.
For real. After seeing this I will probably pick it up as soon as its released into early access on Steam.
one important thing for me is they dont have those annoying "doritos shotting" !!
Shitty Audio and horrific map balance don't look fun