White House: Starr grand jury leak report 'fully exonerates' Kavanaugh | TheHill

Raj Shah is cancerous

News Update: Papadopolous’s wife will be on Ari’s show soon

This whole thing is set up to make democrats look desperate. Democrats want to review documents/memos/reports that involve Kavanaugh, and republicans won't let them. So democrats have to blindly guess which information might be the most useful, and sue to get access to that information. Out of the millions of documents that involve Kavanaugh, blindly picking out one that implicates him in wrongdoing is unlikely.

...the left has lost all credibility and is looking more desperate by the day.

And after each document/report is finally handed over after a lawsuit, the WH and republicans will claim vindication, and repeat this claim that democrats are desperate and grasping at straws.

The democrats just want to review Kavanaugh like every single SC pick in the past has been reviewed, and they are being made to look like conspiracy theorists for their efforts.

The National Archives have already released more than 1,000 pages of documents from his time working as an associate independent counsel for Starr.

For reference, the last SC pick had over 170k total documents turned over for review, at the request of republicans and democrats.

Nothing can exonerate Kavanaugh because Trump picked him. He cannot escape that tarnish.

Uh huh, and what do those who don't have a history of lies say?

Oh, well if the Trump White House says it, it must be true. /s

It implicates him then, I assume.

I'm beginning to think the White House doesn't know the difference between 'exonerate' and 'incriminate'.

Just like Trump hasn't discussed pardoning Manafort? I think I'll take looking at the docs.

Opposite of 'fully exonerates' is 'absolutely implicates', so I'm gonna have to go with that, dawg.

The Russian Honeypot will be on Ari’s show tonight

"White House: What follows is a lie..."

As a reminder, this subreddit is for civil discussion.

In general, be courteous to others. Attack ideas, not users. Personal insults, shill or troll accusations, hate speech, any advocating or wishing death/physical harm, and other rule violations can result in a permanent ban.

If you see comments in violation of our rules, please report them.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

No one in the Trump White House knows what “exonerates” actually means.

So is it safe to say the report does not exonerated him

Cool! Can we read it?

Why would a presumably rational individual like Kavenaugh not be giving some consideration to the real possibility that his entire future reputation will be irreparably stained by his connection to trump's perfidy & impending legal nightmares -- and so consider withdrawing his name from consideration for the seat?

​

He's young enough to calculate that he might be nominated by a non-felonious future POTUS.....