A lot of people argue that homossexuality is wrong because it's not natural, but even if that was true, dogs are not natural and everyone loves them.
[removed]
Posted Aug 25, 2018, 11:56 PM UTC
322
I don’t see how dogs are unnatural?
2
Maybe because we've selectively bred them?
3
Dogs wouldn't exist without humans' artificial selection.
3
This is not exactly correct. Dogs came from wolves. Humans created different breeds through selection, but we didn't 'create' dogs if that's what you are suggesting.
0
I'm not suggesting that, I'm just saying that if we hadn't bred them selectively, they wouldn't be dogs.
1
That makes perfect sense
1
[removed]
1
Nature created humans. Everything we affect is a by product of that creation. So it is natural.
1
Thank God for the native Indians.
1
This isn’t a shower thought
0
why?
1
It’s bringing politics into this subreddit and it isn’t rly supposed to be and also it’s just not good
1
If heterosexuality was eliminated today, the human race would be extinct in about 100 years. Sounds problematic, doesn't it? This is how species propogate and survive. Just because there are some variances doesn't prove anything.
-2
They're homossexual, not sterile, we would sure find a way to survive. I'm not trying to prove anything, I'm just saying that the argument of naturality can't be used to justify hatred.
5
It absolutely can. You just don't agree with it and that's okay too.
1
Justify hatred?
2
No. Explain it. That's all.
1
Homosexuality won't ever over power heterosexuality, and even if it does we wouldn't go extinct because we would figure out a way to make sperm donation and surrogacy more efficient.
3
Yes, but clearly not what natured intended.
0
And clearly English bulldogs aren't what nature intended, but here we are...
2
Absolutely. And it doesn't make it "right".
0
[removed]
[deleted]