Regarding environmental conservatism
I have been following his work quite closely.
My take on your view on religion is this: Religion is a value system that helped the species flourish. This is likely to have developed over generations. It was a trial and error situation, and the best actions survived.
But when it comes to environmental issues it's not a trial and error situation. Fuck ups in this situation are irreparable, the future of the whole world is at stake. We have to abstractly(without actually trying them out) think about these things and decide how to act on these things. Any radical changes to the environment in the form of carbon dioxide or methane percentage can be serious and irreversible.
You could then hope some technological revolution to change the things but it's a big gamble I feel.
Posted Sep 14, 2018, 5:38 AM UTC · edited
I too feel that relying on good old wisdom in destroying environment is a bit silly.