Sex gang victim 'living in fear' after rapist offered access to kid he fathered
dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/745249/sammy...Posted Nov 29, 2018, 8:17 PM UTC
25154
dailystar.co.uk
feminist outrage about this in
three... two...
two and a half........
........
two and three-quarters............
.......................................
60
keyboard feminists don't care about real issues. move on!!
14
Children do need a father figure in their life but a rapist??
Why is this shit even entertained? It's beyond a joke, it is an insult to everyone, not just that poor mother.
The sooner we begin the day of the rope, the better.
47
this is an article from the Guardian telling some of the reasons why this is even a thing in the UK. i hope this judicial process is amended for the sake of the victims. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/nov/29/rapist-father-victim-children-sammy-woodhouse-rotherham-child-abuse
5
Woodhouse has revealed that she was seeking a care order with the support of Rotherham council because she was unable to cope with her son’s complex needs. Perversely, even though the convicted rapist was not named on her son’s birth certificate and had no parental responsibility, the council argued that it was legally required to contact the rapist and notify him of proceedings involving the child.
Jeezuz F. Christ! So If you get a woman pregnant, in a consensual manner, you'll be hounded for child support by the state. However, If you rape her, you have no financial responsibility? Wow!
2
usually you would have no financial responsibility because you're most likely in prison with a no-contact order?
2
But he had some assets before he went to prison, I assume. House, cars, dishwasher, fridge, etc...
2
Not just a rapist. An Islamic extremist.
If you wanted to fuck up the country this would be a good way to go. That child could help recruit more extremists
4
Wtf is wrong with you faggots over in the UK? Jesus fucking christ.
Not allowing this piece of shit to see the kid should be a fucking no brainer.
24
The Rotherham council is basically and Islamic council.
Although only 4% of Rotherham's 260,000 people are Muslim. And on average only 40% of Muslims want to install sharia law in the UK.
The UK people don't seem to care that they are being taken over.
Most figures state 4% but I bets the UK is now at about 6-8% of the UK is Muslim
About 9% of UK mayors are Muslim. There are 29 Muslim mayors in the UK.
In 2017–18, ten of the 32 London Boroughs have a Muslim mayor.
13% of Councillors are muslim. There are about 45 muslim Councillors
75% are on welfare and 40-50% want sharia law. I couldn't find any numbers on how many self segregation.
34% of UK people do not vote
8
Social justice basically. You can’t say no to a person that’s not white basically
5
We're not stupid - nor weak - but it's easy for most people to believe everything's fine because their lives are fine.
Then you've got the Islamists' long march through the institutions, etc, etc. The inaction at the highest levels is a result of the class divide more than anything else.
The working class are taking it more seriously. We had the EDL, now we have the Democratic Football Lads Alliance (lol). We'll know the full scale of the push-back when we see how how far UKIP gets in the next election, especially now they've hired Tommy Robinson.
1
This is by no means victim blaming but good god almighty she should have gotten an abortion.
The very idea of raising your rapist’s baby is sickening on the most primal of levels. Allowing the genes of worthless filth like that to propagate is a damned societal injustice.
13
Is it sickening on the most primal level? Abortion is a very painful thing, and sometimes, especially if you are not a young woman, having an abortion means having significantly lower chances of successfully giving birth to a kid.
Suppose that, say, the mother previously had an abortion or miscarriage and felt terrible about it. She might not be able to mentally handle getting an abortion.
We are all 'victims' of life and make those choices, hopefully, that we think we can best live with.
Given that that may be what she did; making the choice she could live with.. good almighty, how society has failed to protect this woman and her child.
14
Abortion is also sickening on the most primal of levels to a lot people. Two evils don't net a positive always, but I do agree with your sentiment that the concept of raising the child of your rapist is horrible and not something that should be forced upon anyone. It goes to show how strong this woman has been to live with this for so many years and look after the child.
5
If you give people a choice then you must also accept that they may choose differently to you.
Freedom of choice is exactly like freedom of speech inasmuch as you are stuck defending choices you disagree with if you're putting your money where your mouth is.
3
Yes, but if you are pro life then you would essentially be killing an innocent life while the rapist gets to live.
Also, rape probably isn't genetic.
2†
You raise the kid and on the 16th birthday you give them a knife and tell them the whole story.
5
If we are saying that rapists should be put to death why can't we make the government do it? I'm not a big fan of having civilians commit worker and struggle with PTSD for the rest of their lives.
Or maybe I just can't understand jokes.
6
why can’t we make the government do it?
No death penalty in the UK.
Even in the US rape isn’t eligible for the death penalty because of a (really shitty) SCOTUS decision.
5
Lol. If you get PTSD from carving up a rapist you are too weak to be allowed to live.
1
She was 15 and in the hands of one of these rape gangs when this all went down. I don't think that she had access to all the normal channels of healthcare. I could be wrong, though.
2
Yes, but if you are pro life then you would essentially be killing an innocent life while the rapist gets to live.
-2†
while the rapist gets to live
Hey now, I never said the rapist should live.
9
At this point I think it’s fair to say the local Rotherham government is illegitimate and should be treated as such.
They have wantonly failed the women of their community time and time again for the sake of multiculturalism. Absolutely disgusting, contemptible people.
13
Why are there no race riots?
6
Step the fuck up and start shutting this crap down.
5
hahahaahha, the Uk lol
4
I abhorr violence, normally, but if given the chance, I would attempt to kill this man, knowing that whatever the further outcome, I would have done my part in making the world a better place.
It is a shame that the UK justice system and its society have been completely subverted away from justice and the propensity to promote order and peace.
3
What’s twisted is that the long term outcome of this will most likely not be orderly or peaceful.
One of these days the community will realize that their government exists to protect only a small percentage of the population and some rapist motherfucker is going to wind up getting lynched. Maybe this guy will try to get custody and it’ll be him.
And if that happens, considering the shit places like Rotherham have been through... I’m going to have a hard time getting that upset about it.
Vigilantism is, under normal circumstances, abhorrent because it subverts the rule of law. But when the rule of law has already been subverted by the very people tasked with upholding it?...
5
But when the rule of law has already been subverted by the very people tasked with upholding it?...
Only violence remains.
3
There is always some form of justice, as harsh or 'injust' as it may be.
Law is not what makes us civilized towards one another, law is what guarantees a minimum of civility. But if it fails, this guarantee is lost, and it is lost to those who have made enemies within society in particular.
3
The fact that there isn't a national outrage, huge public shaming and charges brought against the Police and council that facilitated these rancid deeds, as well as the perpetrators themselves is appalling.
It means something has seriously gone wrong with justice. What use are the police and courts if they can't even recognise a crime as serious as gang rape?
It looks like there's no such thing as crime and because of 'muh hooman rights' no distinction between wrongdoer and victim. Ideally he'd get the rope, not access within a mile of this woman and her child. He's no father. I'm sure the child feels the same.
3
Why the f*** didn't she abort the kid.
2
they don't invite non-rapist, non-child-molesting non-muslim 'asians' to apply for parental access, is that what you've got to do to be get rights as a man in modern, enlightened, culuturally enriched europe?
2
The article:
oh NOW they want to debate
Rapists should get a say in whether the women get abortions
^ next year
[deleted]
Oh my fuck, the fact the halls of Government in Rotherham aren't a pile of ashes is becoming more astounding each day.
The "miracle" of peasants not being as well-armed as their overlords.
Even peasants in medieval Europe has rights and privileges. The Brits and most of Europe are serfs at best, economic livestock at worst.
Tax livestock - and don't think you're not. I'm aware I'm also tax livestock; they just haven't quite figured out how to breed the horns off American cattle yet.
He doesn’t want access to the child because it’s the child of a kafir whore. He wants a good Muslim wife for his real kids. The white women are just for fun along the way.
I guess muh wamehns isn't higher than mooslimb on the oppressed hierarchy
.... am I supposed to have sympathy for some cunt who says the above quoted? it takes a lot of effort for someone to say something so stupid that they force the reader to necessarily side with a scumbag criminal, but the dumb gint actually managed to do it. Well done.
As to whether or not the guy should have access to the child, obviously not. He is a danger to his child and the braindead woman in question. He should be kept far away.... but hey, it's cunts like that that constantly want to make the U.K. lean more towards socialism, so she's getting what she wanted.
wut