If you heard someone described as 'Asian', would you assume they were from East Asia or the Indian sub-continent?
The UK considers 'Asian' to mean from India/Pakistan etc.
I've always considered Asian to mean East Asian and I've never really noticed other Irish people assuming Indian origin.
Has this always been the case in Ireland or is it influenced by our substantial East Asian migrant population growth in recent times compared to the UK's large Indian and Pakistani population.
Posted Jan 9, 2019, 12:59 AM UTC
Asian means Chinese, Japanese or Korean to me for the most part. Indian means Indian.
How about Vietnam, Thailand, Cambodia, Laos, Indonesia, and the like? Or the Central Asian Republics like Kyrgyzstan?
I wonder if Russians from Vladivostok think of themselves as Asian - and if not, why not?
Southeast Asian to me. Although having spent a considerable time in Asia, I generally don't use the "Asian" term, I usually aim to be more specific, if not by country, then at least by region (East Asia for me would Japan, the Korean countries and everything East of Lhasa/Tibet in China)
I guess context is important. If someone says via text "That person is Asian", I'll probably think "Somewhere East of the Indian subcontinent, but probably not Pacific Islander", unless I know for a fact that the speaker is British. I think Irish people use the term in vaguely the same way that Americans do.
The question I have is do people from Nepal, India and Sri Lanka refer to themselves as Asians?
Some are Asian to me.
[deleted]