Utah researcher: theory of religious influences in Utah LGBT suicides may be overblown
qsaltlake.com/news/2018/12/06/utah-research-o...Posted Jan 14, 2019, 6:37 PM UTC
Posted Jan 14, 2019, 6:37 PM UTC
I mean, one is too many, right? As a community we have a mandate to be kind and loving no matter a person's creed, nationality, race, or orientation. If someone says we should do better, we ought to agree wholeheartedly, even if we don't like the source of the reminder.
Also,
“I hope I didn’t paint a huge target on my chest with this group,” he said to the Guild. Nevertheless, “I want to prepare groups like this group to hear that.”
Good luck.
Yes, we should always do better.
Let’s keep in mind that the person interviewed offered no data, just commentary. Maybe he should have waited until conclusions could be drawn and the study peer reviewed.
I hope people don’t conclude from this sort of article that there is no problem.
Whether or not he's correct, the possibility of this being a major factor should be considered. What is true is that not being able to come out to their parents hurts a lot of kids, and a lot of religious parents cause their LGBT children a lot of pain, even when they have the best intentions. Even if this study doesn't have sufficient evidence, it would be good for parents to decide the best way to support their children and avoid suppressing them if this turned out to be the case.
Of course, but that's not the point of the article. We can always do better to be more understanding of our LGBT brothers and sisters, but the article (and data) is not meant to comment on the specific aspects religious folks could improve upon. Just whether or not religion as a whole has influence on LGBT suicide in Utah.
I have always heard Utah has higher suicide rates. Do you have a theory why if not related to the church? I am not gay so I can’t speak for them, but as an imperfect member I will admit I have contemplated suicide because I don’t think I am good enough to what I am taught at church.
Utah does have a high suicide rate, but so do all of the states along the Rockies, because higher elevations lead to higher depression rate, which in turn bumps up the suicide rate. Unfortunately, at high altitudes, antidepressants also aren’t as effective as they are at lower altitudes, which means that even if you are able to get help, it can take longer to find a dosage that actually works on you.
We’re also landlocked, so fresh seafood is more expensive than it is along the coasts, and seafood helps lower depression rates. We also have a lot of citizens with shared DNA, and depression is often genetic. And we have a lot of people on a fixed budget in our state due to there often only being one source of income. This means that organic, non-processed foods are more expensive and often not available to those who are depressed and need it (this is similar to why poorer people are often more obese than wealthier people, because healthy food is more expensive than boxed, canned, or frozen foods). The weather is also a factor. And we have laxer gun laws than many other states, so it’s easier to actually succeed when you attempt it. So, there are a lot of reasons why the suicide rate is high in Utah.
Utah doesn’t include sexuality as part of their suicide statistics, so there’s no official data on how many of those suicides involve LGBTQ people. It’s entirely anecdotal, especially in teen suicides, as many LGBTQ teens aren't fully out yet. Critics like to look at the high teen suicide rate here and assume that they’re all LGBTQ people, when that isn’t even remotely true, and then they assume that our church must be the only cause, which also has no actual data backing it up.
In fact, studies have shown that the more religious LGBTQ teens are, the less likely they are to commit suicide than their non-religious counterparts, and that the more actively Latter-day Saint they are, that number drops even further. Those studies have been posted on this sub before if you wanted to search for them.
That’s not to say that there isn’t a suicide problem or that our LGBTQ youth aren’t in danger of high depression/suicide rates. We all know that’s not true. But blaming it solely on the church without any official evidence at all to back that up is ridiculous. Studies in Utah have shown that better suicide prevention in our schools drops the teen suicide rates dramatically every time they’re introduced, and every time the state reduces the funding and halts the programs, the rates rise again. That’s something worth investing in.
Do you know if there is a mechanism proposed for higher elevation leading to higher rates of suicide? Is it a causal factor or is it just correlated? It is hard to determine this from survey data but wondering if any hypotheses have been proposed.
I don’t know, either. There have been multiple studies showing that the link exists between higher elevations and increased depression and suicide risks, and at least two that I’ve seen that show the decreased effectiveness of antidepressants in higher altitudes, but I don’t know if it’s a cause or a correlation. It seems to be a cause, based on the way the data has been presented, but I’m not positive.
[removed]
In 2017 Utah had the 6th highest suicide rates in the US according to the CDC.
| State | Suicides per 100,000 | Number of Suicides |
|---|---|---|
| Montana | 28.9 | 311 |
| Alaska | 27.0 | 200 |
| Wyoming | 26.9 | 157 |
| New Mexico | 23.3 | 491 |
| Idaho | 23.2 | 392 |
| Utah | 22.7 | 663 |
| South Dakota | 22.5 | 191 |
| West Virginia | 21.1 | 393 |
| Arkansas | 20.8 | 631 |
| Nevada | 20.3 | 627 |
| Colorado | 20.3 | 1,181 |
| North Dakota | 20.1 | 154 |
| Kansas | 19.1 | 553 |
| Oklahoma | 19.1 | 756 |
| Oregon | 19.0 | 825 |
| New Hampshire | 18.9 | 265 |
| Maine | 18.9 | 274 |
| Missouri | 18.5 | 1,151 |
| Vermont | 18.3 | 112 |
| Arizona | 18.2 | 1,327 |
| Kentucky | 16.9 | 770 |
| Washington | 16.9 | 1,297 |
| Tennessee | 16.8 | 1,166 |
| Alabama | 16.6 | 836 |
| South Carolina | 16.3 | 838 |
| Indiana | 16.3 | 1,092 |
| Wisconsin | 15.4 | 926 |
| Hawaii | 15.2 | 227 |
| Louisiana | 15.2 | 720 |
| Mississippi | 15.0 | 445 |
| Iowa | 15.0 | 479 |
| Pennsylvania | 15.0 | 2,030 |
| Ohio | 14.8 | 1,740 |
| Nebraska | 14.7 | 275 |
| North Carolina | 14.3 | 1,521 |
| Michigan | 14.1 | 1,457 |
| Florida | 14.0 | 3,227 |
| Minnesota | 13.8 | 783 |
| Georgia | 13.6 | 1,451 |
| Virginia | 13.4 | 1,179 |
| Texas | 13.4 | 3,778 |
| Rhode Island | 11.8 | 129 |
| Delaware | 11.6 | 112 |
| Illinois | 11.2 | 1,474 |
| Connecticut | 10.5 | 405 |
| California | 10.5 | 4,312 |
| Maryland | 9.8 | 630 |
| Massachusetts | 9.5 | 682 |
| New Jersey | 8.3 | 795 |
| New York | 8.1 | 1,696 |
First of all, I recommend reading this talk. Please don’t think you are actually expected to be perfect as a mortal being.
Second, no, I don’t have a theory of my own. I shared this article purely for the facts it presents. I can’t pretend to know more than the researcher quoted in the article.
I read a research paper a while back that discussed one possibility. The researchers looked at suicide rates across the country, and then looked at elevation of the different areas that were measured to see if there was a correlation. What they found was that at around 2000 feet above sea level, suicide rates jumped dramatically. They had some theories as to why that might be, and clearly more research needs to be done to see how strong the correlation is, but it does provide a possible explanation.
It doesn't seem very fair to blame the church for not having enough serotonin in our brains. (I've got severe depression and anxiety.) While in the past, my beliefs did cause me severe anxiety and depression, it's how I interpreted them. I now find my beliefs give me hope, strength, and dispel negativity.
It seems disingenuous at worst, and an incomplete picture at best to blame the church for depression. Especially since depression exists outside the church.
When interpreting statistics like suicide rates, automatically assuming it has to do with the Church is called "correlation without causation" unless a definitive and well done study can be done linking the two. Such a study might be out there, but the popular media seems content making poor assumptions without one.
While depression is not necessarily hereditary, having an immediate relative with depression does make it 2-3 times more likely you can have it. Something like this is a much simpler and more grounded explanation than the unsupported straw-man claims of the church causing all or much of the suicide in Utah.
Does the Church need to do better? Sure. And I think they try. We as a body need better education on depression and suicide. And prevention.
It's anecdotal, but if anything, the Church kept me from following through on my darkest times - which were recent. So did my kids.
All I know is that a very close friend of mine said that there is no way he can have the greatest joy in this life (a family) and be gay; so it would be better if he killed himself to be cleansed of his temptations before he committed a grievous sin. This isn’t doctrinally accurate, but this is the way he felt. If he was raised in a more accepting environment, he wouldn’t have those thoughts.
Attribution is a consistent difficulty for humans. Bias is another name for it, as is experience. We interpret data based on our ability to look at the big picture and our experiences. We believe we are more logical than we actually are, and we use confirmation bias to prove it to ourselves.
One strong example in the realm of suicidality is where people misattribute feelings of despair, depression and apathy to events in their lives instead of to an as-yet unknown physiological variable such as low thyroid, low iron, etc. When the problem is treated, the despair goes away even though life events don’t change. It’s a challenge for us humans to consistently include all factors when we attribute cause.
Attribution theory suggests that people who blame global, stable and internal causes for their problems and/or feelings are more likely to be depressed, adding another layer on this complex problem.
Regression analyses are a terrific idea but are only as good as the data used and the skill of the person ordering how variables are entered in the equation.
TL:DR humans have trouble identifying real causes: we should all be more cautious of our conclusions. Trust in the Lord and lean not to thine own understanding. He is smarter than you are.
This is so true. Even researchers/analysts with the expert competence are facing these challenges. They choose models and make assumptions the best they can. Then the media write about it but this is way over their heads, so they simplify and make further assumptions. Then the reader of the article interprets what is written and thinks "science has proven that..."
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[deleted]
There is zero evidence that Utah LGBT suicides are due to religion anyway. It was just a conclusion that exmos jumped to.
EDIT: If you downvoters have some evidence, please share it. You obviously didn't read the article, as the people who study this for a living agree with my assessment.
Attributing all Utah youth suicides, or even all Utah LGBT youth suicides, directly to religion is certainly overstating things, and it frustrates me when people do that.
To say there's no connection though is to show either willful disregard or outright callousness to a vulnerable set of individuals in some serious pain. The Church teaches family is one of the most important things in this life, doesn't it? For many LGBT+ persons in the Church, the expectation for them is they should deliberately avoid participating in that sacred, vital part of life--and at the same time, they're told this life-long trial they must bear will be made up to them, made right, made perfect in the hereafter.
Is it any wonder that some people decide the best solution is to end that lifelong trial early? Should responsibility for such a decision be laid solely on the shoulders of those who bear a burden like that? Can the Church take no responsibility in teaching a more uplifting outlook on life?
This is good hypothesizing, but at some point it should be backed up with data.
For example, multiple studies have shown that elevation is a factor in suicide rates. But you don't get a self diagnosis of this. In other words, you don't get someone saying "I'm feeling suicidal because I can feel that I'm not getting enough oxygen in my lungs". But they will point to something they are immediately facing in their surrounding environment as being the cause, whether it be church, school, family, sexuality, etc.
In other words, sometimes what people think is causing their problem is not what is actually causing their problem.
What would be helpful is getting a much deeper picture into these, which is exactly what this article describes:
Aye, I can only really provide anecdotes from personal experience, and others I've spoken to.
It'll be good to see what exactly turns up in scientifically-rigorous data. Even if it's different from what I expect, the data should provide some insight into resolving a pretty serious problem!
Same here. I'm looking forward to much better data
The elevation evidence is why I'm skeptical of personal anecdotes and personal experience. What people say may just be a manifesting symptom, not a root cause.
But I'm completely not discounting that it happens for some. I'm just wondering how prevalent it is to know if action on it would result in reductions.
OK.
I've got an even better spurious suicide correlation/causation for you: https://i.imgur.com/7H2hCFI.png
[removed]
I wouldn't say there is no connection, but it remains to be seen what that connection is and whether it is a net negative or positive. And in what ways.
Thank-you for writing this. Agree so much. The idea that someone must agree that a part of themselves is a pathology to be endured, and at some blessed future day, eliminated, is a very heavy one. If the person doesn't see it that way, it's a horribly destructive idea.
i don't think it's fair to demand that members or church leadership change their message. But i wish the people who find themselves immersed in a toxic spa of despair and disgust could just leave. Just walk away.
That is definitely not encouraged. i get why it's not by member and can respect why they feel that way, even though i don't agree with it. But i sometimes wonder if everyone who views themselves as defender of the faith, attempting to excise what they view as being separate from the person ever stop to inspect the effects of doing so, and consider if it was all really worth it. Maybe sometimes it works - but mostly, i can't say that's what i've noticed.
It's all just so sad.
Other psychology studies find that the act of painting a no-choice scenario, like the one you paint above, is one of the biggest parts of the problem.
When a struggling person hears over and over again that there are only 2-choices : Stay and be miserable, or leave, and neither choice works for them that's when those individuals start to feel most backed into a wall. There are at least 4 choices for LGBT youth in this scenario: Stay and be miserable, stay and be happy, leave and be miserable, leave and be happy. The one thing they need to stop being told is that they're being asked to bear an impossible burden. Humans have born similar burdens or worse for millenia. They need to be told their is a path for them to be happy and they can find it. For some that choice will be to leave, for some it will be to stay. Some will believe, and others will stop. Some will date and others will prefer the single life.
I feel like the church and it's members are making slow strides, but strides still, at supporting, accepting, and loving our LGBT youth no matter their choices. The other side, however, is drawing a hard line in the sand and is continuing to paint those youth into a false binary-choice.
Yes. People are responsible for their own lives. Bearing an emotional burden does not obviate that responsibility.
The responsibility of the Church is to preach faith in Jesus Christ and repentance to bring us closer to Him. That message is uplifting, not degrading.
We desire to spread the peace and strength of the Holy Spirit, to mourn with those who mourn, to comfort those who stand in need of comfort. We are not anywhere close to perfect at it, but the message itself is not what needs to be perfected.
[removed]
Stop imagining the data! This is exactly the kind of assertions that don't help.
Want to solve suicide problems? Stop forcing the data to make it be what you want. Find a relationship, don't just imagine one.
For example, take a look at the heavily populated AND pro-LDS counties in Utah according to this suicide by county graphic: http://www.intheforefront.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/GPK5C7GPZY2NVPEGJIAQMLUILA.gif
Notice that Utah, Davis, Morgan, and Cache counties are doing very well? (Even Rexburg stands out in Idaho)
Notice that rural areas struggle throughout the West, including heavily LDS and non-LDS rural areas?
Trying to force an anti-LDS agenda into the data requires significant stretching and imagining, and ultimately hurts trying to combat the suicide problem.
Nothing in response to anything else that he wrote that was backed up by statistics and scientific inquiry?
This poster has a history with us...he pops up on our mod radar far too often.
He laid out good evidence about suicide, religion, and LGBQ folks. The first part of his post was great.
But then he jumped through several layers of imaging data to condemn the LDS church. Elsewhere he questioned one of the links he gave because the lead author was religious. Then doubled down on it. He lost his posting privileges in this thread due to that.
So...where's the study that connects LGBT suicide to Church membership, specifically?
[removed]
[removed]
We've never had a set of science/academic rules in this sub, but I'm going to institute one here. Casting doubt on a scientific study because someone is also religious is garbage. Total garbage.
[removed]
[removed]
Truth.
[removed]
[removed]