Do we have a tier system for rumours?
Is there a rough tier system for trustworthiness of various news sources in wrestling media?
How would this sub go about creating such a system? How was it done elsewhere?
Posted Feb 17, 2019, 4:44 PM UTC
09
Wrestlingvotes, ringside news are tier fuckoff
9
To be honest I don't give a fuck. They all have their times. My favorite is Satin because at least he has a modern approach and is pretty reliable.
2
I think everyone has their "Top guy" as far as who they trust the most and most websites are going to be getting their info from one of those guys anyways be it Meltzer, Satin, Wade Keller or so on.
2
I say take everything with a grain of salt even if it comes from someone reliable. Even the most reliable sources can have wrong information.
1
We were thinking about this, but couldn't agree and the whole idea stalled.
Personally I would take everything with a grain of salt, but I put more stock in things posted by the big 6 (Meltzer, Alvarez, Keller, Scherer, Johnson and Satin).
Then there are some that are complete jokes, like WrestleVotes and RingSideNews.
When it comes to scandalous rumors... TMZ are scummy, but they're usually reliable.
1
Everything Dave says is gospel. Everyone else just twists his words or change their plans just to make him look bad.
1
- Dave Meltzer
- The guy down the street
- This board
1
WON is the holy bible
The rest is shit, including the one mentioned previously
-1
Not again.