Is $150k enough to start a family?

I (30yr/m) am on $50k, my partner (29yr/f) is on around $100k and we are thinking of having a child in the near future. We have a mortgage, no other debts and can generally be pretty good with money. I'm just a bit worried that we won't be earning enough to raise a child, especially if we decide to have another one after that. And if she ends up taking extended maternity leave or anything like that, then our household income may be even lower.

Does anyone with this kind of income have experience they can share?

Posted Feb 20, 2019, 12:59 AM UTC

2594
_RKT•

It's more than enough if you manage your money alright. I know people with less do alright raising more than one child. As soon as your wife recovers, you should be the house husband though.

55
AspiringGuru•

The money will always work out. even on a 50k income atm, the money should not be the deciding factor.

Parenting is much more than money. (yes, a lot of issues are solved with money)

Talk to people who are already parents, there's bound to be a wealth of knowledge in your network. Tap into that.

3†
ImMalteserMan•

I somewhat disagree, I think finances should definitely be a factor, knowledge won't pay the bills.

How much strain will a child put on you financially? How much will that strain effect you emotionally or effect your relationship? Can you still afford to pay the mortgage? Any medical expenses associated? Can you afford the extra expenses associated with raising a child?

I know two people who have had children and had to move back in with their parents because they couldn't afford to survive otherwise :(

27
[deleted]•

[deleted]

4
AspiringGuru•

I hear you. I've known a few families who struggled financially. None of those families or family members regretted the experience.

My main point: don't put financial wealth ahead of personal/family issues. (don't take this to the opposite extreme either and have 20 kids).

1
[deleted]•

[deleted]

-26
smallsiren•

The reason women’s earnings tend to stagnate around 30 is because they often stay at home to raise children though. Those years out of the workforce are what stop their income increasing, not just the fact that they’re women.

39
[deleted]•

[deleted]

-38
ILiveInAVillage•

Yeah generally.

36
fyeeah•

"What? The gender pay gap isnt real? Nah, can't be true. Too lazy to check."

20
surg3on•

That maxing out at 30 might be related to going part time to look after children though...

16
UltraCompressorOP•

Well with my 1% a year increase or whatever it is I get, i'm never going to catch up to her anyway. She already earns double what I do. And if she doesn't take years off to raise the child then her wages won't stagnate like some other mothers do. But I just want to plan for unforseen circumstances like injury, postpartum depression, etc that might mean she can't work and we end up on $50k between us. I know i'm just worrying but I think it's better to be prepared than to find yourself in the shit later on.

6
Pwnage_•

Why can't you stay at home and your wife work? She could take maturity and when that runs out, you make the transition as she returns to work.

8
UltraCompressorOP•

Yeah that would financially be the best option. Is it socially acceptable to be a stay at home dad while the wife works now though? I can't imagine the shit i'd get from her friends, etc.

4
_RKT•

That's why you have insurance within your super. Check income protection/TPD cover within your super and adjust it to your liking. Plus you probably want to look at how you can increase your income.

2
Bluebird_83•

TPD have very specific definitions usually never being able to work ever again within any field which fits within your education, training or experience. Some income protection cover needs you to have ceased work because of the illness or injury. Pregnancy is generally not considered so if you cease work because of maternity leave and the complications mean you cannot return to work theres generally a three month waiting period and may mean you don't qualify. Accident or illness cover can be more appropriate

1
[deleted]•

[deleted]

1
_RKT•

Well.. people recover after giving birth at different rates. Financially it only makes sense that the wife returns to work as soon as she feels READY to get back to work. If she wants to take care for their children and want to be a house wife, that's OK too but living on $50k will be very difficult.

2
ivanyoz•

Can you please show me these statistics?

1
PoorTank•

Dole bludgers have kids, you'll be fine. Kids cost as much as you want them to cost. Dont play keeping up with the Kardashians and throw gender reveal parties, over the top birthday parties and other nonsense.

46
UltraCompressorOP•

Nah we're not into all that kind of stuff anyway. I'm just talking things like food, clothing, school expenses, etc. I have no concept of how much a child costs so there are probably things i'm not thinking of.

5
rplej•

Spending on children is so flexible. It can expand or contract a lot depending on the funds you have available, or what sort of life you want them to have. My husband was earning around $36k 16 years ago when our first was born. We lived cheaply and carefully. Now he earns multiples of that and the last few years we've spent over $10k per year on extra curriculars for our kids. That's something we would never have chosen to do all those years ago. It just would have been impossible. If we were still on that $36k we would make different choices, cheaper extra curriculars, etc.

You can afford kids on $50k. But the question is can you afford the life you want on $50k? And live where you want on $50k? What are your hard limits?

8
UltraCompressorOP•

We live in an outer suburb of Perth, and i'm quite happy with my lifestyle at the moment, which is quite simple and cheap. I don't really go and spend loads of money on nights out, don't smoke or do drugs. We eat out a bit but would obviously stop doing that so often. So all of our disposable income would go toward the kid anyway. I guess i'm just more worried that our 'fun money' today is enough to raise a kid on in a year.

2
oj109•

Having kids on $150k in Perth is extremely doable. You can live a very comfortable lifestyle of your choosing with kids in pretty much any suburb.

4
MellyO2017•

Babies don't cost a lot of money initially.... Nappies $11-16 a week, Formula $20-30 a week (breastfeeding isn't always possible or your wife may choose not to do this so it's best just to factor this cost in). Baby consumables such as Baby Panadol ($5), Dummies ($10 for 2), Bonjela ($9) and Baby Wipes ($2-5) will need to be purchased weekly/monthly (once they start teething that is).... This can add up quicker than you think so it's best to buy in bulk before the baby arrives if you think you can't budget for these items....

2
RichieMclad•

Really depends where you are located, what your current mortgage repayments are, what other debts you have, what your scope for pay increases are, who will be taking time off work etc.

18

Yes.

It about 80 G's to buy a baby on the black market......add another 20 G's if the eyes stay blue.

17
CytotoxicCD8•

ULPT: have two kids, sell one on the black market to fund the other. /s

5
opackersgo•

If you're frugal though you can just hang out outside a childcare center and get one for free.

4
maniolas_mestiza•

Is there a reason why you can’t be the primary parent after the initial maternity leave?

14
UltraCompressorOP•

No, actually it would work out better that way as she earns more than I do. Would obviously have to fend off all the "Ohh you're babysitting today!" comments though lol

But in that case would $100k be enough for the 3 or 4 of us?

10
opackersgo•

"Ohh you're babysitting today!"

"Oi cunt, mind your own business." There, comments avoided.

24
www_enthusiast•

or " alrighty mate. have fun at work, I'm at home with my kids spending time with them"

1
ChesFTC•

Would obviously have to fend off all the "Ohh you're babysitting today!" comments though lol

Best response I've come across is "I'm sorry, my wife died while giving birth". I think it's quite fair to be brutal to people who are that sexist.

10
rohanmwilliams•

I'm currently stay at home parent to our 12 month old in Sydney, while my wife is main breadwinner with similar salary to your partner. It's definitely affordable with some basic budgeting. In the first six months or so, especially if your partner is breastfeeding, baby isn't that expensive really. Main expenses were a pram, car seat and bassinet/cot. I think all up we might have laid out about two grand in preparation for baby arrival. Clothes can be very cheap from places like Kmart and Cotton On Kids, and to be honest, they don't really need much stuff. Nappies end up about 30-ish cents per nappy, so probably not more than 20 bucks a week even if you use nearly 10 a day.

We were definitely hesitant about our financial situation in the lead up because you simply don't know what you're in for, but so far it's been manageable.

Now that our daughter is a bit older and we've started daycare, that's the biggest weekly expense. Even with the government subsidy, we pay about $120 a week for two days of daycare. Sydney is a bit ridiculous so that might be cheaper in Perth.

I currently work part time and am the main at home parent and my wife went back to work part time after 8 months, and back to full time about a month ago.

Tbh, I'd encourage any dad who's in a feasible position to do so to spend some time as the stay at home parent. It's easier after the first six months I would say, but it's not only great bonding time, but it's a real lesson in how difficult and relentless it is being at home with a young kid. In many ways, work is much easier. My wife and I have both experienced both and it gives us better insight into the challenges we face on a daily basis, and we can better share the non work responsibilities too.

8
UltraCompressorOP•

Cool thanks for the insight :) $120 a week is probably what we spend on going out for dinner, buying coffee/lunch unnecessarily at work so I could easily give that up.

2
[deleted]•

[deleted]

1
maniolas_mestiza•

Sure. It massively depends on your individual needs and lifestyle though. But I’d recommend living on that amount now, save the other $50k, then you’ll have a buffer for when kids do come along. When they start school, they’ll need tech and clothes and money for education, if they go to uni, there may not be HELP anymore, they may have specific health issues, anything could happen. Just make sure you have at least some buffer and live within your means, kids have been brought up successfully on much less.

5
Pwnage_•

I get this a lot. I generally say "not babysitting, it's called parenting."

Usually makes them stop the laughing and shut the fuck up.

4
SixFootJockey•

Would obviously have to fend off all the "Ohh you're babysitting today!" comments though lol

Man, I hate comments like that.

1
Punk_Nerd•

The other thing to consider is full-time parenting is really weary. It's great and all but after a while your whole life is about the kid(s). I had a mate who chose to be a stay at home Dad. He lasted 2 months and said he'd rather work for free than looking after his kids full-time. Parenting is great in moderate doses.

1
gaianwave•

The benchmark imo for living with a mortgage, kids and two cars running is 150k a year for a comfortable life in Aus. If your wife decides to stop work you will feel a pinch with 50k only, but there are benefits for kindy and daycare for lower income earners. The dual income threshold at the moment for a family before you stop getting rebates are 180k I think.

11
seraphim1234•

Losing the 100k is actually more than a pinch.

35
damienp•

Yeah what the fuck, losing 2/3 of your household income is far more than a pinch.

4
fortis-in-arduis•

Benchmarks like this don't make sense as it's so cost of living dependent.

$150k pa in Vaucluse NSW probably isn't even middle class after your huge mortgage / rent.

$150k in Toowoomba QLD is very upper middle class.

As an example of that, I work with a colleague who is paying over $22,000 a year in school fees in Victoria for 1 child. Another who is up in Toowoomba pays around $12,000 per year for three children.

25
oj109•

Exactly. It's not how much you earn, but what you do with it.

Social factors and location come into play.

I grew up in a small coastal town and going to the local (public) high school was pretty much the only option and it was pretty good. It wasn't affluent, but it wasn't rough either - just very normal people. Very Home & Away lol. If you have a kid, you just send your kid to the local school without thinking about it. They can get a good education and because they are pretty much on an equal peg with everyone else, they have the belief that if you put in the effort you can move to the city for university and achieve whatever you want to. Or you could stay at home and live a comfortable life, working in a cafe/real estate/local firm with your family/freinds nearby.

I then worked and lived in the Eastern suburbs of Sydney and if I had a kid there (or even in Sydney at all) I wouldn't consider public school. Sydney is so much bigger and denser, and that includes the extremely rough dropkick types to offset the huge amount of highly ambitious kids. Plus I would feel guilty for "betraying" them because there is a big divide in the lifestyles and outlook on life between private and public school kids that I would be shutting them out from getting the best out of life and they would be able to witness that for themselves. If you can't beat the system, join them. So if I was living in Vaucluse, I would expect to spend at least $20-30k per child.

It's about social psychology as above. The blue chip firm I worked for, 90% of employees either private school types or people from regional towns. There were surprisingly extremely few public school students from the city (and even then they were mostly from the selective high schools)

2

$20-30k per child on high school education for Vaucluse families is on the low end. My students who live there receive private tuition for English, Maths and at least one science subject at a minimum. Music lessons are also extremely expensive if you stray away from piano, violin or flute. Sydney oboe, clarinet and harp instructors are charging $100+/hr. None of my Vaucluse, Bondi nor Breakfast Point parents are teaching their kids to drive either because they own tanks for cars so they're also paying someone else to do it.

1
oj109•

Hence the "at least". The school tuition fees are just the start.

As for the cars, I see a lot of tanks around with L and P plates. Even though they are powerful, the power/weight restrictions don't apply because the cars are so heavy. Or they buy their kids a brand new car - like a Golf etc

And what is Breakfast Point like? I don't know much about the suburb and its demographic except that a lot of the Chinese super-rich like to buy there for some reason. It seems a little out of the way.

1
UltraCompressorOP•

Well we have two cars but own them outright, so no debt there. Would probably upgrade one of them to something bigger, but we have a small amount of savings we could use for that so we would still not be in debt. I think she would go back to work after maternity leave, but the anxious side of me always makes me consider the worst case scenario and make sure we're covered. I think just because I grew up with absolutely nothing I want to make sure my kids are never left wanting.

She would be able to claim Centrelink if she wasn't working though right so we wouldn't just be on $50k household income?

6
Lampshader•

I think she would go back to work after maternity leave

What does she think?

consider the worst case scenario and make sure we're covered

This is prudent. I know a few mothers who stayed off work longer than they had expected. Can't think of any that went back sooner than planned...

9
UltraCompressorOP•

I think she would go back to work after maternity leave

What does she think?

She thinks this too, but like you said, mothers often stay off longer than expected. I always like to plan for things going wrong, so wouldn't want us to end up in financial trouble, or with her feeling like she has to go back to work if she isn't up to it.

5
endersai•

Would depend on her parental leave entitlements. For example, I'm on 185k, wife is on 190k, and she was able to do 9mo parental leave at half pay.

3
MellyO2017•

You will definitely be able to claim Centrelink... If you go to the Human Services website you can type in a dummy scenerio of having 1 child and $50k wage and it will show you what you are entitled to each fortnight .

3
seraphim1234•

A nice trial run would be to survive on your income and whatever additional from Centrelink would come from your partner’s income. Save the rest for 6 months as it serve as a bird’s nest.

After 6 months, 2 of you would have your conclusion and have a small backup fund.

After the baby is born, there are several options. You can get your parents to help take care of the kids and both of you work. If you find the 6 months trial acceptable, then you can continue working and she takes care of the child or you can quit working and she continue working, which works out slightly better without imposing on your parent with slightly better income.

3
zaxma•

Less than 120k family income. 2 kids under 10 years old. I'm getting 70cent from centre link fortnight. They always claim you can get pay raise and give you hight estimate income. Who knows how many comes back in tax return time.

1
opackersgo•

The dual income threshold at the moment for a family before you stop getting rebates are 180k I think.

FTB A requires 80k or less combined income for the family.

FTB B requires 100k combined or less.

https://www.dss.gov.au/families-and-children/benefits-payments/family-tax-benefit

1
sl_aus•

Before or after tax?

1
original_dino•

We have a combined income of 55k, for the next 2-6 years, living in a regional city in Queensland.

We do fine with 3 children, no one misses out.

I could go back to work and hit the 150k mark like you guys and we would be living like kings.

Frankly it just depends on your individual case and lifestyles.

Absolutely no reason you can’t do this on 150k.

9
SOYMAN132•

Why don't you crunch the numbers yourself. Only you know what your expenses are.

7
Pwnage_•

As a new dad, there is no perfect time to have kids. I see this argument a lot "wait until I have more money before having kids". The way I see it, you're trading time possibly spent enjoying being a parent for time working for someone else in the hope you will have more money for when you have kids. You're only ever going to get older.

We are in a comfortable position. I am home full time, my wife works full time. Take home around 60k. We didn't have much if an option as to when to have kids, for reasons I won't get into here. But I'm glad it happened sooner rather than later. I get to spend more of my life with my daughter now as a result. When I return to work, we will be in a better situation because of it. There is no $ value you can put on it.

5
ohmymsjojo•

Kids are as cheap or expensive as you want them to be. Dress your kids in designer play suits versus Kmart?Spend $25k a year sending them to a private school or $2k to a state school? Need the insta appropriate bugaboo or happy with a mothercare special. Your lifestyle, income and aspiration will determine how expensive your kids are. Not financial advice, but I think you’ll be fine.

5
tentensalami•

I rent with my husband and 8 month old daughter in inner city Melbourne on $85k and we live a fantastic life. We own one car outright but use it rarely. We go on holidays and go out for dinner, to concerts, etc., on occasion, and save a higher % than average for the future. If you spend money on stuff that doesn't matter or if you care about keeping up with the Jones's then it might not be enough. But, like others said, children can be as inexpensive to raise as you want, beyond a few basics.

4
UltraCompressorOP•

Any tips on things you realised or had to implement? That other people might not have thought of?

1
tentensalami•

I think it's more of a mindset issue than having any particular tips or tactics. When I think about the things that I value with regards to my kid, they include a place to live safely and comfortably, healthy food for her, and time to spend with her and my husband. None of those things cost very much. The rest is optional - expensive toys, new clothes they will grow out of in months, private lessons. Kids need a few basics but mainly attentive, loving parents.

6
design2last•

You are worrying about the wrong number! Your income only really comes into play when calculating your child care subsidy rate. What actually matters is your savings rate! What is your income minus the sum of your fixed costs and your discretionary spending?

My family has spent between $50k and 55k per year for the last four years. The last of which includes the first 10 months of having a child. We rent in Brisbane for $20k pa, own one car outright, have one trip to the US to visit family each year and have no debt besides HECS.

Message me if you want help creating a basic Excel budget or any questions.

​

3
boganknowsbest•

If the scummys in Frankston can have 6 kids on centrelink benefits, I think you should be safe on 100k.

2
KiwasiGames•

We had two kids with a single income on $65k without any real financial difficulty. Especially given how many government incentives kick in once you have kids.

2
theresnorevolution•

People raise perfectly happy, well-adjusted children on much less money in countries with much less social support than Australia.

Can you provide emotional and physical safety for a child? That's much more important than your salary.

2
forg3•

Umm dirt poor Africans manage to have many kids. Have your family, time is a greater limiter than income. Less chance of genetic deformities the younger you both are and more time for more kids should you want them.

Money can be earned later, but time you cannot get back. Yes, your lifestyle will take a hit as kids will cost money and time, but if you want them it will be worth the cost and you'll find ways to deal with having less money available.

2
UltraCompressorOP•

Yeah but why would I choose to bring my kids up like dirt poor Africans if I didn't have to? Weird suggestion. I grew up poor so obviously want to make sure my kids are never left hungry or wanting, or not able to afford school trips/supplies.

1
forg3•

My point is, money really isn't the most important thing here. You want kids, have them and find a way to support them. Better to have them younger then when you are older. Considering you have a combined income of 150k+ it's really a moot point, you can more than afford it.

Does it mean that you won't be able to go on your nice fancy OS holiday each year? Maybe.

2
jezwel•

For us, maternity leave = not enough income to pay for everything.

Doing it twice in quick succession has certainly thrown a spanner in the works, but we're getting it sorted.

I'd recommend getting your car situation sorted out (you probably want a recentish small-mid sized SUV that can hold a double pram in the back plus fit 2 car seats - using sedans or hatches is a killer on your back) plus a chunk of backup savings ($20k) before having a child - and that's after all the birthing costs (and pram, child seat, cot, change table and whatnot you'll need).

Anyway, that's what I'm telling my friends who are considering having a child. They sorted the car out and now looking at accommodation - better to plan ahead than find out in the middle!

1
[deleted]•

[deleted]

1
emjaybeachin•

It becomes a shitload easier if you have a buffer in the form of savings or an offset account for the mortgage. For example we love a pretty comfortable lifestyle (without eating out or taking holidays) on a combined <100k. We have 3 kids, mortgage, I work 0.8 and wife is 0.5, two kids in two days a week daycare. Daycare rebate is about 7k a year at our income level. We also get a bit of family tax b, but the thing that helps the most is us both being in low tax brackets, and not having the time or energy to waste money on toys and fancy shit.

We made sure we had about a year or more worth of expenses stashed in the offset account before going for kid no 3. To be honest that was made possible by refinancing the mortgage, and being content that we are just making ends meet until the kids all hit school and we can work more

1
[deleted]•

[deleted]

1