hardaOP•

If you want to just jump into our most liked content, here are some positive comments Optech has received on some of our recent newsletters and original research (with links added by us):

"Stellar work [...] I think I never had understood the time warp attack in its full extent. Your appendix [to Newsletter #36] changed that today!"

---Mark (Murch) Erhardt, community-elected moderator for the Bitcoin StackExchange (source)

"In case you freaks missed it, Mike Schmidt from the Bitcoin Optech team dropped this very interesting analysis on Replace by fee (RBF) transactions in the wild."

---Marty, author of Marty's Bent Newsletter and host of Tales from the Crypt podcast (source)

"As always, outstanding work! You picked the best talks from the [Stanford blockchain] conference and provide a very thorough summary!"

---Max Hillebrand, World Crypto Network (source)

"Reading @bitcoinoptech yearly round up should disabuse you of this notion that 'all interesting development has halted'"

---Stephan Livera, host of the Stephan Livera Podcast (source)

"To my surprise the last @bitcoinoptech newsletter mentions a very small pull request I made that recently got merged into LND. Bitcoin Optech Newsletter is by far the best source of information for the latest fixes and features. Subscribe if you manage Bitcoin nodes."

---Xavi Soler, LND contributor (source)

"@bitcoinoptech takes a break from their usual format to summarize the incredible technology and #Bitcoin proposals presented at Scaling Bitcoin 2018 (@ScalingBitcoin). Don't miss a really fun read & discussion!"

---Guy Swann, The Cryptoconomy Podcast (source)

"The @bitcoinoptech dashboards are pretty nice; I especially like the dynamic display of uneconomically spendable dust outputs based upon various fee rates."

---Jameson Lopp, CTO Casa (source)

12
CrackMansionButlerredditor for 4 weeks•

!lntip 1000 ty

2
BashCo•

It looks like these are being published about once every week or two? We should consider stickying the new ones on r/Bitcoin for a day or so when they are published so they don't get lost in the fray.

8
TheGreatMuffin•

Yeah they don't get much upvotes and go down under easily, perhaps because people are unfamiliar with the name yet? Which is a pity, because of the high quality content.

7
hardaOP•

Thanks for submitting them in the past! Is there anything we could do on our side that you think would help? E.g. more detailed page titles or something. Looking at the list, I realize that "Bitcoin Optech Newsletter #nn" is probably whatever the opposite of click bait is. :-)

5
TheGreatMuffin•

I realize that "Bitcoin Optech Newsletter #nn" is probably whatever the opposite of click bait is. :-)

That's exactly what I've been thinking, too :)

The name is a bit "inexpressive" (I like it, but it's probably won't get an unfamiliar user to click on the link). What I tried in the past is to give a brief summary in the title of what it is about: Bitcoin Optech #24 (weekly newsletter for technical developments on Bitcoin) (5 upvotes), or to put the topics of the particular issue into the title: Bitcoin Optech Newsletter #19 (c-lightning, overt ASICBoost, BIP69, Lightning Residency/Hackday etc) (25 upvotes). According to this very comprehensive samplesize (haha), the latter approach seems to attract more attention :) But maybe it's just that the topics of that specific issue were more interesting for the readers.

I think mentioning the topics definitely helps at least a little though, because it shows that it's a legit "deep dive" newsletter, not some random news aggregator site (of which there are plenty being posted here, too).

Hope that helps :) Appreciate your work!

4
hardaOP•

A newsletter every week since June 2018 (except that we took two weeks off for the end-of-year holidays) and special features intermittently. I don't know if stickying all of them is appropriate though, as often the content can get pretty technical (and there's also slow news weeks).

However, if you think it'd be useful, we'd be happy to poke a mod or something on weeks when we think we have especially high-quality and accessible content.

3
Bitcoin_21•

ty OP

3
santoterracomputingredditor for 3 months•

!lntip 100 good stuff!

2
any_ything•

thanks

2
ikustov•

!lntip 500 thanks

1
lntipbot•

Hi u/ikustov, thanks for tipping u/harda 500 satoshis!

You didn't have enough balance, you can pay the following invoice [QR / URI] instead.


!lnbc5u1pwgdtf9pp5z53w7x3zanlt7q748jyuxsx8f4qjvv33fy2f0j7ct4jnr3hzhphsdp5xfsngdph8pjrqc35vs6rgdfev93rwvnzxg6kxd34xuuxvdp5v5uscqzysxqrp9sp90feawtljgsr7c66s79l57efd9u8ls7qrt5d340crx6nk9rlefp5juep9awen5mt2sfpm87sd3he3up2d5djlzu7q4tgs8pg4nkgmqqn0lrnq!<


^(More info) ^| ^(Balance) ^| [^(Deposit)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=lntipbot&subject=deposit&message=!deposit 10000) ^| [^(Withdraw)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=lntipbot&subject=withdraw&message=!withdraw put_invoice_here) ^| ^(Something wrong? Have a question?) ^(Send me a message)

1
soyc76•

!lntip 200 very good readings, thanks!

1
lntipbot•
1
[deleted]•

[removed]

1
[deleted]•

[removed]

1
[deleted]•

[removed]

1
crypto_traderrredditor for 3 weeks•

thanku. this information had been useful for me :)

​

1
[deleted]•

[removed]

1
Top_Riskredditor for 3 weeks•

Why is everyone getting paid?

1
[deleted]•

[removed]

1
1317WMredditor for 3 months•

!lntip 2100

1
lntipbot•
1
[deleted]•

[removed]

0