Please baselessly psychologize random women in a nicer (but still sexist) way. Your chosen verbiage is too egregious.
np.reddit.com/r/TheMotte/comments/bl7xh0/_/en...Posted May 14, 2019, 2:54 AM UTC
399
np.reddit.com
dazed111
/r/kotakuinaction user
Well what a surprise!
Other than that, I think that this thread was already going south since the beginning. I mean, this is from the first post in the comment chain:
It's commonly observed that men are the high variance gender: more likely to be kings, more likely to die enslaved to kings. At the top end, it's better to be a man, with all the power that a patriarch commands. At the bottom end, it's better to be a woman, as historically 80 percent of women reproduced, and only 40 percent of men survived to do so.
[...]
Social media is now making the socially powerful socially vulnerable, and the socially vulnerable socially powerful.
And this is the second:
We're hoping it's an option where they can't even use social media until they are 16 or so. No smart phone, blocking access to those domains on the router, etc. I'm at the point where I'd rather they look at a mountain of pornography and snuff films than be exposed to social media.
To me, it looks like this thread was headed towards "You're just a whore. No need to rationalize it." since the beginning, they just didn't realize it.
Plus, I'm always amazed how those supposed libertarian/heterodox types always fall back on the "oh my god social media is going to kill my kids, better forbid them from using it altogether" moral panic.
28
snuff films? Wtf, what is this motte poster into? That is very much dark web stuff.
14
Come on, they're just underlining the point: sneer smart, not hard
11
You are right, my bad.
4
Lol I hope you die in a fire
I am inclined to look forward how you end your lifespan in a place with an oxygen-consuming exothermic reaction.
14
It would have been one thing if you had merely said "I think you may be overrationalizing your sexually promiscuous behavior" But your chosen verbage was egregious.
I wonder if you'd be allowed to say "I think you may be overrationalizing your racist behavior," or would that also be considered egregious?
5
No, your chosen verbiage is egregious, sir!
4
[deleted]
1
They're literally just asking people to make the exact same vicious personal attacks, but rephrased to not use bad words.
I call it the Huckabee strategy (applies to both Mike and his daughter)