[Serious] The case for government assigned girlfriends
I was thinking about the analogy of sex market to job market.
In this analogy, Chad is astronaut/actor/pro athlete/etc, and incel is janitor/mining/other heavy labour. We see the equivalent of hypergamy in this market to a certain extent; a disproportionate percentage of people try to become actors/singers/whatever.
However most settle and give half-hearted effort to their new betabuxx office job. This is because you need a job, and cannot really survive without a means to earn money. There are those who cheat the system and make do without; these are the equivalent of fatties who have fat fetish gfs, if they exist (I think you get the point)
Imagine if you didn't need a job, or would rather not work than take a shitty job. For instance, if you introduce policies which enable this, such as UBI.
Nobody will have to do the incel jobs, and hence hypergamy (or whatever the term is) will go unchecked since you don't need to do anything. All people would try for the Chad jobs: doctor lawyer athlete astronaut model, etc. Leaving nobody to be a janitor or miner.
This is an analog to the current state of the sexual market.
Most UBI proponents have thought of this and decided the way to go is to incentivise such jobs, thereby making their value come on par with other jobs. Make janitors much more highly paid so that people will become janitors rather than pursue a more Chad career.
There is no equivalent to this in the sexual marketplace. My proposal is a government incentive for dating your looksmatch and limiting your partner count. Also, make cheating illegal.
Discuss.
Edit: obviously this won't happen because we aren't needed by society like janitors are. But suppose we started mass roping much quicker and the government needed our tax money, they'd have incentive to try something.
Posted May 26, 2019, 5:06 AM UTC
[deleted]
Big time level cope, wtf
[deleted]
Lmao this is the most retarded thing I’ve ever read
I can't imagine people coming to terms with literally farming holes.
I could see people sympathizing with incels if we're protrayed as regular people, just lonely and ugly. Would require an enormous suinami or an Oscar winning movie or something to reach that level of cultural sympathy.
Well, you would have to remove key sections of their cerebrum and replace them with electronics, but if you did, I don't think they'd qualify as persons, the issue would be establishing when this has to be done, in utero or before age 1 or whatever. That way, disadvantaged men could finally enjoy the companionship of attractive women, in addition to having children with them---sex and companionship aren't the only things, all creatures desire to leave a copy of themselves, from plants to bacteria to mammals. If a creature doesn't desire this, it just means it is deformed.
Lol turn around the pro abortion rhetoric back on women. You aborted this baby girl because it's not a human. We rescued it and turned it into a sex doll. You can't argue it's human now.
That's a good line of thought, saving the aborted babies.
Raising them in a machine would be like a hobby.
There we go, that is where we can get the fetuses from, women can have abortions, the fetuses will simply be extracted whole and utilized to provide qt3.141 companions for unattractive males. Everyone wins.