Help with New Apartment Setup - AP's vs Wired Mesh, also somethings wrong.
So I just moved to a new apartment and got Fios 400/400 plan installed. In my previous apartment I had an ER-X and AC-Lite combo and it worked great. I'm not going to tinker with it much, so I didn't love the software but I got it working just fine.
So I install the ER-X/AC-Lite at the new place after Fios sets up (ethernet straight from the ONT, no Coax/Moca) and I'm not getting much more than 150 MBPS wired. Fios guy said it's because I'm not using his router, he plugged in his own router and I was able to get 400+ in both directions over wifi so he left.
I couldn't replicate that with my own setup. So I went to Microcenter to try out some things. I picked up a Google Wifi pack and a USG.
I tried just one Google puck and everything was in the 300ish range over wifi and near 500 wired(using fast.com, google speed test was a little slower).
I then tried the USG. Wired it was just as fast as the Google puck, but speeds over the AC-Lite were back below 100. I tried the Google Puck in bridge mode off the USG and the speeds were great so I figure it was something with the AC-Lite.
So I try the ER-X wired again (side note- i enabled offloading), still slow. So I'm thinking maybe it's the POE injector. I had the line going from the ONT to the POE injector then to the ER-X and AC-Lite powering both of those. I used the USG wall plug for the ER-X and skipped the POE as the ER-X powered the AC-Lite. Wired to the ER-X speeds are fantastic (near 500+) and AC-Lite is just fine (250ish).
So I'm thinking it's the POE now. I can replace that or just get a plug for the ER-X. I do like the way the USG looks and the software is nice though. Performance wise- would there be a reason to not return the USG and use it over the ER-X. My only issue with the USG is it won't run two LAN's at once.
So the apartment is only about 800 SF, but it's got a lot of brick and plaster walls. 35 feet away from the router in the bedroom (opposite end), speeds drop dramatically. Not an issue though, I got COAX running the exterior, I'll just replace it with Cat6 and put a AP in the bedroom at the other side of the apartment.
So if I wanted to keep the USG, I'd need to get switch which would be an additional piece of hardware I'd like to avoid if I can. Unless something like a NanoHD is that much better than an AC-Lite that it could get through those walls, I doubt it.
So I'm thinking I have two options.
1- Buy a NanoHD and new POE or wall plug for the ER-X. NanoHD in the living room, AC-Lite wired in the bedroom.
2- Just use the Google Wifi, wire a puck in each room and put the third somewhere in the middle without a wire.
3- Keep the USG and run a NanoHD or AC-Pro and see how far it reaches.
I like idea 1 the best, but given that my AC-Lite wasn't as fast as the Google wifi, I'm wondering why bother jumping through hoops with the software. I don't tinker with it much, I just want something solid that reaches through the apartment and into the backyard a bit. I'm also open to a different system, but I couldn't find one that fit my needs. I didn't want to spend Orbi money as I'll wire it anyway, Amplifi wouldn't let me wire up the extenders, Eero won't either.
Any advice is greatly appreciated.
Posted Jun 10, 2019, 11:37 AM UTC
Depending on your needs (need to tweak) take back the Google Wifi (works amazing, but can't tweak like the AP) and keep the ER-X and USG. If everything in your place runs off wifi, you can run two network with just the USG and AP if you have their server running somewhere to set it up.
Been a while, but with the server, I believe you can run the AP off one port and a wired off of the VOIP port (either or). So if you only have one to hardwire, you can do without the ER-X
Why would I need both the ER-X and USG? I don't do much tweaking, only need a router and a switch with two ports for both AP's that I think I will need.
I don't follow the second paragraph. Do you mean using both ports on the USG? I tried turning on the LAN2, but I can't use both that and LAN1 together.
I haven't done it, but you should be able to use both. I believe it's not like a switch, but you would assign your wired network to port 1 and wireless network to port 2. Just different subnets I believe.
If you wanted more ports, then you could use both, no? Good line speed into USG then feed to ER-X for ports. Might have misunderstood.
By using both I'd be using the USG as the router and ER-X as the switch? I'm assuming there's a setting for that?
I'd probably opt to just use the ER-X since I don't have much room for two boxes, It's a small-ish apartment without room. I'm mounting these down by the floorboard and don't want too much clutter.
Sorry, thought you didn't want to use the ER-X due to speed concerns, but wanted ports.
Im sure of you ask over on /ubiquiti someone will have a better answer as to why you are getting speed issues.