Confucius — Sage and Moralist (i)

by John Lord, LL. D.  


     ABOUT one hundred years after the great religious  
     movement in India under Buddha, a man was  
     born in China who inaugurated a somewhat similar   
     movement there, and who impressed his character  
     and principles on three hundred millions of people.  
     It cannot be said that he was the founder of a new  
     religion, since he aimed only to revive what was an-  
     cient.  To quote his own words, he was "a transmitter,  
     and not a maker."  But he was nevertheless, a very  
     extraordinary character; and if greatness is to be  
     measured by results, I know of no heathen teacher  
     whose work has been so permanent.  In genius, in   
     creative power, he was inferior to many; but in influ-  
     ence he has had no equal among the sages of the  
     world.  
        "Confucius" is a Latin name given him by Jesuit  
     missionaries in China; his real name was K'ung-foo-  
     tseu.  He was born about 550 B.C., in the province  
     of Loo, and was the contemporary of Belshazzar, of  
     Cyrus, of Crœsus, and of Pisistratus.  It is claimed  
     that Confucius was a descendant of one of the early  
     emperors of China, of the Chow Dynasty, 1121 B.C.;  
     but he was simply of an upper-class family of the State  
     of Loo, one of the provinces of the empire,——his father  
     and grandfather having been prime ministers to the  
     reigning princes or dukes of Loo, which State resem-  
     bled a feudal province of France in the Middle Ages,  
     acknowledging only a nominal fealty to the Emperor.  
        We know but little of the early condition of China.  
     The earliest record of events which can be called  
     history takes us back to about 2350 B. C., when Yaou  
     was emperor,——an intelligent and benignant prince,  
     uniting under his sway the different states of China,  
     which had even then reached a considerable civiliza-  
     tion, for the legendary or mythical history of the coun-  
     try dates back about five thousand years.  Yaou's son  
     Shun was an equally remarkable man, wise and ac-  
     complished, who lived only to advance the happiness  
     of his subjects.  At that period the religion of China   
     was probably monotheistic.  The supreme being was  
     called Shang-te, to whom sacrifices were made, a deity  
     who exercised a superintending care of the universe;  
     but corruptions rapidly crept in, and a worship of the  
     powers of Nature and of the spirits of departed an-  
     cestors, who were supposed to guard the welfare of  
     their descendants, became the prevailing religion.  
     During the reigns of these good emperors the stand-  
     ard of morality was high throughout the empire.  
        but morals declined,——the old story in all the States  
     of the ancient world.  In addition to the decline in  
     morals, there were political discords and endless wars  
     between the petty princes of the empire.  
        To remedy the political and moral evils of his time  
     was the great desire and endeavor of Confucius.  The  
     most marked feature in the religion of the Chinese,  
     before his time, was the worship of ancestors, and  
     this worship he did not seek to change.  "Confucius  
     taught three thousand disciples, of whom the more  
     eminent became influential authors.  Like Plato and  
     Xenophon, they recorded the sayings of their master,  
     and his maxims and arguments preserved in their  
      works were afterward added to the national collection  
     of the sacred books called the 'Nim Classes.'"  
        Confucius was a mere boy when his father died, and  
     we know next to nothing of his early years.  At fif-  
     teen years of age, however, we are told that he devoted  
     himself to learning, pursuing his studies under con-  
     siderable difficulties, his family being poor.  He mar-  
     ried when he was nineteen years of age; and in the  
     following year was born his son Le, his only child,  
     of whose descendants eleven thousand males were  
     living one hundred and fifty years ago, constituting  
     the only hereditary nobility of China,——a class who for  
     seventy generations were the recipients of the highest  
     honors and privileges.  On the birth of Le, the duke  
     Ch'aou of Loo sent Confucius a present of a carp,  
     which seems to indicate that he was already distin-  
     guished for his attainments.  
        At twenty years of age Confucius entered upon po-  
     litical duties, being the superintendent of cattle, from  
     which, for his fidelity and ability, he was promoted  
     to the higher office of distributer of grain, having at-  
     tracted the attention of his sovereign.  At twenty-two  
     he began his labors as a public teacher, and his house  
     became the resort of enthusiastic youth who wished to  
     learn the doctrines of antiquity.  These were all that  
     the sage undertook to teach,——not new and original  
     doctrines of morality or political economy, but only  
     such as were established from a remote antiquity,  
     going back two thousand years before he was born.  
     There is no improbability in this alleged antiquity  
     of the Chinese Empire, for Egypt at this time was  
     a flourishing State.  
        At twenty-nine years of age Confucius gave his  
     attention to music, which he studied under a famous  
     master; and to this art he devoted no small part of  
     his life, writing books and treatises upon it.  Six  
     years afterward, at thirty-five, he had a great desire  
     to travel; and the reigning duke, in whose service  
     he was as a high officer of sate, put at his disposal  
     a carriage and two horses, to visit the court of the  
     Emperor, whose sovereignty, however, was only nomi-  
     nal.  It does not appear that Confucius was received  
     with much distinction, nor did he have much inter-  
     course with the court or the minsters.  He was  
     a mere seeker of knowledge, an inquirer about the  
     ceremonies and maxims of the founder of the dy-  
     nasty of Chow, an observer of customs, like Herod-  
     otus.  He wandered for eight years among the various  
     provinces of China, teaching as he went, but with-  
     out making a great impression.  Moreover, he was  
     regarded with jealousy by the different ministers of  
     princes; one of them, however, struck with his wisdom  
     and knowledge, wished to retain him in his service.  
        On the return of Confucius to Loo, he remained  
     fifteen years without official employment, his native  
     province being in a state of anarchy.  But he was  
     better employed than in serving princes, prosecuting  
     his researches into poetry, history, ceremonies, and  
     music,——a born scholar, with insatiable desire of  
     knowledge.  His great gifts and learning, however,  
     did not allow him to remain without public employ-  
     ment.  He was made governor of an important city.  
     As chief magistrate of this city, he made a marvel-  
     ous change in the manners of the people.  The duke,  
     surprised at what he saw, asked if his rules could   
     be employed to govern a whole State; and Confucius  
     told him that they could be applied to the government  
     of the Empire.  On this the duke appointed him  
     assistant superintendent of Public Works,——a great  
     office, held only by members of the ducal family.  So  
     many improvements did Confucius make in agriculture  
     that he was made minister of Justice; and so wonder-  
     ful was its management, that soon there was no ne-  
     cessity to put the penal laws in execution, since no  
     offenders could be found.  Confucius held his high  
     office as minister of Justice for two years longer, and  
     some suppose he was made prime minister.  His au-  
     thority certainly continued to increase.  He exalted  
     the sovereign, depressed the ministers, and weakened  
     private families,——just as Richelieu did in France,  
     strengthening the throne at the expense of the nobil-  
     ity.  It would thus seem that his political reforms were  
     in the direction of absolute monarchy, a needed force in  
     times of anarchy and demoralization.  So great was his  
     fame as a statesman that strangers came from other  
     States to see him.  
        These reforms in the state of Loo gave annoyance   
     to the neighboring princes; and to undermine the in-  
     fluence of Confucius with the dukes, these princes sent  
     the duke a present of eighty beautiful girls, possessing   
     musical and dancing accomplishments, and also one  
     hundred and twenty splendid horses.  As the duke  
     soon came to think more of his girls and horses than   
     of his reforms, Confucius became disgusted, resigned  
     his office, and retired to private life.  Then followed  
     thirteen years of homeless wandering.  He was now  
     fifty-six years of age, depressed and melancholy in  
     view of his failure with princes.  He was accompa-  
     nied in his travels by some of his favorite disciples,  
     to whom he communicated his wisdom.  
        But his fame preceded him wherever he journeyed,  
     and such was the respect for his character and teach-  
     ings that he was loaded with presents by the people,  
     and was left unmolested to do as he pleased.  The  
     dissoluteness of courts filled him with indignation and  
     disgust; and he was heard to exclaim on one occasion,  
     I have not seen one who loves virtue as he loves  
     beauty,"——meaning the beauty of woman.  The love  
     of the beautiful, in an artistic sense, is a Greek and  
     not an Oriental idea.  
        In the meantime Confucius continued his wander-  
     ings from city to city and State to State, with a chosen  
     band of disciples, all of whom became famous.  He  
     travelled for the pursuit of knowledge, and to impress  
     the people with his doctrines.  A certain one of his  
     followers was questioned by a prince as to the merits   
     and peculiarities of his master, but was afraid to give  
     a true answer.  The sage hearing of it, said, "You  
     should have told him, He is simply a man who in his   
     eager pursuit of knowledge forgets his food, who in the   
     joy of his attainments forgets his sorrows, and who  
     does not perceive that old age is coming on."  How  
     seldom is it that any man reaches such a height!  In  
     a single sentence the philosopher describes himself   
     truly and impressively.  
        At last, in the year 491 B.C., a new sovereign reigned  
     in Loo, and with costly presents invited Confucius to  
     return to his native State.  The philosopher was now  
     sixty-nine years of age, and notwithstanding the re-  
     spect in which he was held, the world cannot be said  
     to have dealt kindly with him.  It is the fate of  
     prophets and sages to be rejected.  The world will not  
     bear rebukes.  Even a friend, if discreet, will rarely  
     venture to tell another friend his faults.  Confucius  
     told the truth when pressed, but he does not seem to  
     have courted martyrdom; and his manner and speech  
     were too bland, too proper, too unobtrusive to give  
     much offence.  Luther was aided in his reforms by  
     his very roughness and boldness, but he was sur-  
     rounded by a different class of people from those   
     whom Confucius sought to influence.  Conventional,   
     polite, considerate, and a great respecter of persons in  
     authority was the Chinese sage.  A rude, abrupt, and  
     fierce reformer would have had no weight with the  
     most courteous and polite people of whom history  
     speaks; whose manners twenty-five hundred years  
     ago were substantially the same as they are at the  
     present day,——a people governed by the laws of  
     propriety alone.  
        The few remaining years of Confucius' life were  
     spent in revising his writings; but his latter days   
     were made melancholy by dwelling on the evils of  
     the world that he could not remove.  Disappoint-  
     ment also had made him cynical and bitter, like  
     Solomon of old, although from different causes.  He  
     survived his son and his most beloved disciples.  
     As he approached the dark valley he uttered no  
     prayer, and betrayed no apprehension.  Death to  
     him was a rest.  He died at the age of seventy-  
     three.  
        In the tenth book of his Analects we get a glimpse   
     of the habits of the philosopher.  He was a man of  
     rule and ceremony.  He was particular about his  
     dress and appearance.  He was no ascetic, but mod-  
     erate and temperate.  He lived chiefly on rice, like  
     the rest of his countrymen, but required to have his  
     rice cooked nicely, and meat cut properly.  He  
     drank wine freely, but was never known to have ob-  
     scured his faculties by this indulgence.  I do not  
     read that tea was then in use.  He was charitable and  
     hospitable, but not ostentatious.  He generally trav-  
     elled in a carriage with two horses, driven by one of  
     his disciples; but a carriage in those days was like  
     one of our carts.  In his village, it is said, he looked  
     simple and sincere, as if he were one not able to  
     speak; when waiting at court, or speaking with offi-  
     cers of an inferior grade, he spoke freely, but in a  
     straightforward manner; with officers of a higher  
     grade he spoke blandly, but precisely; with the  
     prince he was grave, but self-possessed.  When eat-  
     ing he did not converse; when in bed he did not  
     speak.  If his mat were not straight he did not sit  
     on it.  When a friend sent him a present he did not  
     bow ; the only present for which he bowed was that  
     of the flesh of sacrifice.  He was capable of excessive  
     grief, with all his placidity.  When his favorite pupil  
     died, he exclaimed, "Heaven is destroying me!"  His  
     disciples on this said, "Sir, your grief is excessive."  
     "It is excessive," he replied.  "If I am not to mourn  
     bitterly for this man, for whom should I mourn?"  
        The reigning prince of Loo caused a temple to be  
     erected over the remains of Confucius, and the number  
     of his disciples continually increased.  The emperors of  
     the falling dynasty of Chow had neither the intelligence  
     nor the will to do honor to the departed philosopher,  
     but the emperors of the succeeding dynasties did all  
     they could to perpetuate his memory.  During his  
     life Confucius found ready acceptance for his doc-  
     trines, and was everywhere revered among the people,  
     though not uniformly appreciated by the rulers, nor  
     able permanently to establish the reforms he inaugu-  
     rated.  After his death, however, no honor was too  
     great to be rendered him.  The most splendid temple  
     in China was built over his grave, and he received  
     a homage little removed from worship.  His writings  
     became a sacred rule of faith and practice; schools  
     were based upon them, and scholars devoted them-  
     selves to their interpretation.  For two thousand  
     years Confucius has reigned supreme,——the undis-  
     puted teacher of a population of three or four hun-  
     dred millions.  
        Confucius must be regarded as a man of great hu-  
     mility, conscious of infirmities and faults, but striving  
     after virtue and perfection.  He said to himself, "I  
     have striven to become a man of perfect virtue, and  
     to teach others without weariness; but the charac-  
     ter of the superior man, carrying out in his conduct  
     what he professes, is what I have not attained to.  
     I am not one born in the possession of knowledge, but  
     I am one who is fond of antiquity, and earnest in  
     seeking it there.  I am a transmitter, and not a  
     maker."  If he did not lay claim to divine illumina-  
     tion, he felt that he was born into the world for a  
     special purpose; not to declare new truths, not to  
     initiate any new ceremony, but to confirm what he  
     felt in danger of being lost,——the most con-  
     servative of all known reformers.   
        Confucius left behind voluminous writings, of which  
     his Analects, his book of Poetry, his book of History,  
     and his Rules of Propriety are the most important.  
     It is these which are now taught, and have been  
     taught for two thousand years, in the schools and   
     colleges of China.  The Chinese think that no man  
     so great and perfect as he has ever lived.  His writ-  
     ings are held in the same veneration that Christians  
     attach to their own sacred literature.  There is this  
     one fundamental difference between the authors of  
     the Bible and the Chinese sage,——that he did not  
     like to talk of spiritual things; indeed, of them he  
     was ignorant, professing no interest in relation to the  
     working out of abstruse questions, either of philosophy 
     or theology.  He had no taste or capacity for such  
     inquiries.  Hence, he did not aspire to throw any  
     new light on the great problems of human condition  
     and destiny; nor did he speculate, like the Ionian  
     philosophers, on the creation or end of things.  He  
     was not troubled about the origin or destiny of  
     man.  He meddled neither with physics nor meta-  
     physics, but he earnestly and consistently strove to  
     bring to light and to enforce those principles which  
     confined his attention to outward phenomena,——to  
     the world of sense and matter; to forms, precedents,  
     ceremonies, proprieties, rules of conduct, filial duties  
     and duties to the State; enjoining temperance, hon-  
     esty, and sincerity as the cardinal and fundamental  
     laws of private and national prosperity.  He was no  
     prophet of wrath, though living in a corrupt age.  He  
     utters no anathemas on princes, and no woes on peo-  
     ples.  Nor does he glow with exalted hopes of a mil-  
     lennium of bliss, or of the beatitudes of a future state.  
     He was not stern and indignant like Elijah, but more  
     like the courtier and counsellor Elisha.  He was a man  
     of the world, and all his teachings have reference to  
     respectability in the world's regard.  He doubted more  
     than he believed.   
        And yet in so many of his sayings Confucius rises to an  
     exalted height, considering his age and circumstances.  
     Some of them remind us of some of the best Proverbs  
     of Solomon.  In general, we should say that to his  
     mind filial piety and fraternal submission were the  
     foundation of all virtuous practices, and absolute obedi-  
     ence to rulers the primal principle of government.  He  
     was eminently a peace man, discouraging wars and vio-  
     lence.  He was liberal and tolerant in his views.  He  
     said that the "superior man is catholic and no partisan."  
     Duke Gae asked, "What should be done to secure the  
     submission of the people?"  The sage replied, "Advance  
     the upright, and set aside the crooked; then the people  
     will submit.  But advance the crooked, and set aside   
     the upright, and the people will not submit."  Again  
     he said, "It is virtuous manners which constitute the  
     excellence of a neighborhood; therefore fix your resi-  
     dence where virtuous manner prevail."  The follow-  
     ing sayings remind me of Epictetus: "A scholar whose  
     mind is set on truth, and who is ashamed of bad   
     clothes and bad food, is not fit to be discoursed with.  
     A man should say, 'I am not concerned that I have   
     no place,——I am concerned how I may fit myself for   
     one.  I am not concerned that I am not known;  
     I seek to be worthy to be known.'"  Here Confu-  
     cius looks to the essence of things, not to popular  
     desires.  In the following, on the other hand, he  
     shows his prudence and policy: "In serving a prince,  
     frequent remonstrances lead to disgrace; between  
     friends, frequent reproofs make the friendship dis-  
     tant."  Thus he talks like Solomon.  "Tsae-yu, one  
     of his disciples, being asleep in the day-time, the  
     master said, 'Rotten wood cannot be carved.  This  
     Yu——what is the use of my reproving him?'"  Of a  
     virtuous prince, he said: "In his conduct of him-  
     self, he was humble; in serving his superiors, he was  
     respectful; in nourishing the people, he was kind; in  
     ordering the people, he was just."  
        It was discussed among his followers what it is to be  
     distinguished.  One said: "It is to be heard of through  
     the family and State."  The master replied: "That is  
     notoriety, not distinction."  Again he said: "Though  
     a man may be able to recite three hundred odes, yet if  
     when intrusted with office he does not know how to  
     act, of what practical use is his poetical knowledge?"  
     Again, "If a minister cannot rectify himself, what  
     has he to do with rectifying others?"  There is great  
     force in this saying:  "The superior man is easy to  
     serve and difficult to please, since you cannot please  
     him in any way which is not accordant with right;  
     but the mean man is difficult to serve and easy to  
     please.  The superior man has a dignified ease without  
     pride; the mean man has pride without a dignified  
     ease."  A disciple asked him what qualities a man  
     must possess to entitle him to be called a scholar.  
     The master said: "He must be earnest, urgent, and   
     bland,——among his friends earnest and urgent, among  
     his brethren bland."  And, "The scholar who cherishes  
     a love of comfort is not fit to be deemed a scholar."   
     "If a man," he said, "take no thought about what is  
     distant, he will find sorrow near at hand."  And again,  
     "He who requires much from himself and little from  
     others, he will keep himself from being an object of  
     resentment."  These proverbs remind us of Bacon:  
     "Specious words confound virtue."  "Want of for-  
     bearance in small matters confound great plans."  
     "Virtue," the master said, "is more to man than  
     either fire or water.  I have seen men die from tread-  
     ing on water or fire, but I have never seen a man die  
     from treading the course of virtue."  This is a lofty  
     sentiment, but I think it is not in accordance with the  
     records of martyrdom.  "There are three things," he  
     continued, "which the superior man guards against:  
     In youth he guards against his passions, in man-  
     hood against quarrelsomeness, in old age against  
     covetousness."  
        I do not find anything in the sayings of Confucius  
     that can be called cynical, such as we find in some of  
     the Proverbs of Solomon, even in reference to women,  
     where women were, as in most Oriental countries, de-  
     spised.  The most that approaches cynicism is in such  
     a remark as this: "I have not yet seen one who could  
     perceive his faults and inwardly accuse himself."  His    
     definition of perfect virtue is above that of Paley:  
     "The man of virtue makes the difficulty to be over-  
     come his first business, and success only a secondary    
     consideration."  Throughout his writings there is no  
     praise of success with virtue.  Nor have I found in  
     his saying a sentiment which may be called demoral-  
     izing.  He always takes the higher ground, and with  
     all his ceremony ever exalts inward purity above all  
     external appearances.  There is a quaint common-sense  
     in some of his writings which reminds one of the say-  
     ings of Abraham Lincoln.  For instance: One of his  
     disciples asked, "If you had the conduct of armies,  
     whom would you have to act with you?"  The master  
     replied: "I would not have him to act with me who  
     will unarmed attack a tiger, or cross a river without a  
     boat."  Here something like wit and irony break out:  
     "A man of the village said, 'Great is K'ung the phi-  
     losopher; his learning is extensive, and yet he does  
     not render his name famous by any particular thing.'  
     The master heard this observation, and said to his dis-  
     ciples: 'What shall I practise, charioteering or arch-  
     ery?  I will practise charioteering.'"  
        When the Duke of Loo asked about the government,  
     the master said: "Good government exists when those  
     who are near are made happy, and when those who  
     are far off are attracted."  When the Duke ques-  
     tioned him again on the same subject, he replied:  
     "Go before the people with your example, and be  
     laborious in their affairs. . . .  Pardon small faults,  
     and raise to office men of virtue and talents."  "But  
     how shall I know the men of virtue?" asked the  
     duke.  "Raise to office those whom you do know."  
     The key to this political philosophy seems to be  
     this: "A man who knows how to govern himself,  
     knows how to govern others; and he who knows how  
     to govern other men, knows how to govern an empire."  
     "The art of government," he said, "is to keep its affairs  
     before the mind without weariness, and to practise  
     them with undeviating constancy. . . . To govern  
     means to rectify.  If you lead on the people with  
     correctness, who will not dare to be correct?"  This  
     is one of his favorite principles; namely, the force  
     of a good example,——as when the reigning prince  
     asked him how to do away with thieves, he re-  
     plied: "If you, Sir, were not covetous, although you  
     should reward them to do it, they would not steal."  
     This was not intended as a rebuke to the prince, but  
     an illustration of the force of a great example.  Con-  
     fucius rarely openly rebuked any one, especially a  
     prince, whom it was his duty to venerate for his  
     office.  He contented himself with enforcing prin-  
     ciples.  Here his moderation and great courtesy are   
     seen.  

from Beacon Lights of History, by John Lord, LL. D.,
Volume I, Part I: The Old Pagan Civilizations, pp. 144 - 162
©1883, 1888, by John Lord.
©1921, By Wm. H. Wise & Co., New York

Posted Jun 15, 2019, 10:18 PM UTC · edited

10
Loading comments…