allhailalexdelpieroDel Piero•

Random fact,he is born in the city of Middlefart.

29
Super_Sic58Nedved•

Big if true.

5
Lord_Maul•

He would be a great signing, but I’m not sure how I’d feel about it if it meant losing Dybala.

There was a period of time in 17/18 where Dybala was one of the best players in the world, no doubt about that. I’m sure he’s a good manager away from returning to great form.

21
RemarkableWork•

Dybala plays second striker, Eriksen mostly attacking midfielder.

11
Lord_Maul•

Seriously? That’s your response to my comment?

-24
RemarkableWork•

What happened?

15
[deleted]•

[removed]

-1
WhyAlwaysMe1991Del Piero•

LOL what the fuck?? Did he offend you

That seems like a very reasonable response to your comment

3
Lord_Maul•

How the fuck is it a reasonable response? It's dumb, and careless. Tottenham have made several bids for Dybala recently. It's been all over the press. So it's obvious why I'm mentioning both players in the same circumstances.

I don't care about the downvotes an iota...his response was lazily patronising. If I'm writing in detail about the exploits of Dybala's previous seasons, it's pretty obvious I know Dybala doesn't play the same position as Eriksen. So why does this person feel the need to be patronising and say they Dybala plays a different position to Eriksen? Plus, he's not even spelling Eriksen's name correctly.

...as I've said, it's frankly totally obvious why I'm comparing them. Tottenham have made several transfer bids for Dybala in recent days, which has been plastered all over the international media. If someone is going to be patronising to others about which player plays in what position, then they should at least be following the news. I bleed black and white blood, I follow Juve news every day. It's completely obvious why I'm comparing both Dybala and Eriksen. It doesn't take the brains of a nuclear scientist to work out that if we go for Eriksen, Spurs will very likely ask for Dybala in exchange.

-7
RemarkableWork•

but I’m not sure how I’d feel about it if it meant losing Dybala.

How is Dybala involved?

0†
funeverdoneOP•

A trade of Dybala for Eriksen plus some cash (since his contract is running out) would be nice.

Then use the money to buy Icardi.

Ramsey - Pjanic - Rabiot

-------------Eriksen------------

--------Icardi Ronaldo-----

Don´t tell me that wouldn´t be awesome

-1†
marct10•

We don't need Icardi, it's just more trouble than anything. He and Wanda can go to Napoli where they will be more than welcomed.

20
TheBigShrimpSilver Dybala•

Don’t say we lol

I’ll take Icardi with open arms

-2†
marct10•

True that we isn't the best word but it just to say that Icardi with Juve isn't the best option.

1
KillaginaDybala •

If we lose Dybala then we need Icardi

-4
marct10•

Juve could get someone else there's plenty of option than that canvas.

0
RemarkableWork•

Or maybe have a front two of Dybala and Cristiano

15
RemarkableWork•

No wingers?

1
funeverdoneOP•

Costa and Berna when needed

5
RemarkableWork•

Starting 11?

-3
Kaladinar•

Agreed!

1
Barcasincesince1995CR7•

replace pjanic with bentacure

-8
RemarkableWork•

A player who plays mostly as attacking midfielder. Hmmm.

7
gianspinalicHan Kwang Song•

The source is Marca, so I hope you have a productive afternoon..

3
RemarkableWork•

I read Marca has been good this summer

4
gianspinalicHan Kwang Song•

And of course they can be..

But a Spanish newspaper, speaking of a trade of a footballer of an English team for one of an Italian team, because the coach of the Italian team is asking for it...

Sounds like a lot of information to me for someone who covers the Spanish league mainly

2
funeverdoneOP•

come back to me in the coming days

1
gianspinalicHan Kwang Song•

No thanks, I don't know you and I find it strange that you ask me to go somewhere with you.

1
funeverdoneOP•

I´ll find you

1
TimonFM2Padoin•

Just read on Sportmediaset that he could be the replacement of Pjanic, not Dybala.

2
RemarkableWork•

But Pjanic mostly plays as DM and Ericsen mostly as AM.

11
TimonFM2Padoin•

I know that and I had the same doubt. Maybe Sarri wants a more offensive playmaker than Pjanic. But I do think Sportmediaset is just being wrong.

1
MrCrosyFino Alla Fine•

Pjanic literally played offensive role at Roma lol.

9
TimonFM2Padoin•

I know, but he's been playing as DM for 3 seasons now, while Eriksen has always been playing as AM iirc

1
_virpe_•

Sarri said he was impressed by Rabiot when subbed for Pjanic in that role...

4
Gildarts3•

Rabiot is infact a superb passer.

He could be a registra with very good defensive qualities. Something rare in this world.

Pjanic could play right side mezzala again like he did in Rome. He scores a shitton of goals and assists in that position.

3
Barcasincesince1995CR7•

swap him with pjanic

1
Barcasincesince1995CR7•

The 27 year old Danish midfielder will not renew the contract (expiring in 2020) with Tottenham because he considers his adventure in London ended after six seasons. (SportMediaset/Marca)

1
ItzValeeJuve will win 2020 UCL•

Juventus 19/20 4-3-1-2 confirmed

1
RemarkableWork•

Should go for 4-1-3-2 or 4-4-2

1
ItzValeeJuve will win 2020 UCL•

Eriksen wouldn't fit in 442

1
RemarkableWork•

True

1