Synergies tied to Signature level: dick move?

Discussion

So Sunspot has synergies that are at their most effective at max signature ability. Pretty sure another champ introduced this year has the same thing. This really rubs me the wrong way. Kabam has said they didn’t want people to rely on synergies, particularly in Act 6. Then they go and make fights that are almost impossible to solo without two champions on your team whose only purpose is synergy - that you have to have as 5 stars to use (duped Captain Sparkles the only exception I’ve seen). Now, if you want to use the new synergies, you not only need to have them as a 5 star, to get the most out of it they need to be awakened and sig 200. I could get over it if 4 stars were allowed in Act 6, because it’s at least feasible to max out a new champion if you’re that far in the game, but you can’t. Which is a HUGE requirement, even if you’re a big spender. And, if you’re a (mostly) F2P player as myself, you can only hope to max sig 1 champ of each class every year or 2. I’ve been playing 4 years and have 2 5 stars at max sig and one at 180. No one else is even close. I don’t expect to have as large rosters as people that spend, but I don’t think it’s too much to ask that at least we don’t get punished for not having max sig champions for champions when we want to use their synergies.

Not sure why I’m posting this because it’ll never amount to any sort of change and it’s more of the same bitching and moaning about F2P, but I haven’t heard many people’s talk about this issue.

Posted Aug 6, 2019, 5:55 PM UTC

818
monclermanThe Champion•

I haven’t duped any of my main 5*s out of my past 30+ crystals . Basically got enough materials for two rank 5s but I’m holding out for a dupe or a new god tier

3
Breakout86•

out of my 10 r5 i only duped 2 with crystal pulls. the rest is awakened

3
SrDoubter•

"Not sure why I’m posting this because it’ll never amount to any sort of change and it’s more of the same bitching and moaning about F2P, but I haven’t heard many people’s talk about this issue."

well...least you got this part figured out :)

-19
Mickmack12345•

Just like all your unhelpful, condescending comments that always seem to revolve around your snide opinions....

Imagine being this big of a hypocrite and not realising it

4
SrDoubter•

i agree with him.....you couldnt glean that from my post?

i guess your fascination with me has taken over :P

or do you disagree with OP?

-1
Mickmack12345•

Your post has nothing to do with agreeing or disagreeing with OP, you literally reference one quote which has nothing to do with the main body of the post and try to affirm OPs doubts in themselves

I have zero fascination in you, but every time I see your comments I have an urge to call you out on them, just how you have the audacity to make them in the first place

You’re the type on person who will never take blame for anything, never admit to a fault, always reflect back onto others and assume you’re right, and I feel sorry for you for the most part. But I suppose I know at the end of the day you’ll just reply with a few quippy comments and a few smileys and be done with it

1
SrDoubter•

"Your post has nothing to do with agreeing or disagreeing with OP"

hahaha sure it does....you just cant use your brain enough to connect the dots.....

OP put out a good argument....but is smart enough to take a step back and realize that its probably not going to get much attention for the simple fact no1 is talking about it...of which, i took a step back and congratulated him on at least having the savvy to know the inherent flaw of his argument/idea, is that many will write it off as typical "bitching and moaning"

of which the irony of it all, is that you and others are doing the same to my comment thinking that is all it is and that, to me, is the real punchline!!!

sorry mate....but you dont understand me one bit....you are simply fascinated with me and anything i do burns you up....soooooo....i guess i will just drop this right here https://youtu.be/42Q27I-FAwY?t=61

-1
mikemil50Void•

You're not getting punished, you're just complaining. It's a great way to allow champs to ramp up and expand their synergies without giving it all away up front. That's how you end up with synergies that seem cool in theory but don't do much. Locking them behind sig levels is a great way to expand possibilities and capabilities.

-19
savymcocinc•

I usually never say this but that is Exactly what a Kabam Employee would say. ☝️

6
ManTyme•

Kabam mike 😂

5
mikemil50Void•

You caught me

-4
savymcocinc•

Let me guess!?
You would have gotten away with it too, if it wasn't for me and those meddling kids!!! 🤦

2
mikemil50Void•

I always forget this is less of a news and discussion forum and more of a "complain about every single thing" forum.

-8
secondhandkidOPIron Man Infinity War•

So, serious question... Why not make them not suck to begin with? I’m not particularly excited about a champion that won’t be particularly useful for a year or more.

3
mikemil50Void•

Who says they'll suck at first? If that's the case, sure, complain. But I'm taking it as more it'll go from "eh" to awesome.

0
secondhandkidOPIron Man Infinity War•

Fair enough. None of them jumped out at me as game breaking anyway, even at full power. But we will see. I just hadn’t seen anyone talking about so was wondering what people’s thoughts on it were. I know at least one other champ released this year had synergies scale with sig level. I don’t remember who and would like to hear from someone who has that champ.

2
mikemil50Void•

Adding 10% to Domino's crit bleed chance is big. Adding 40% is HUGE

2
[deleted]•

[deleted]

1