Operation Red Shift: How the Left Controls Language and How We Can Combat This

I'm not the author of this. It was posted here several months back as a pastebin link. That pastebin has now been removed. Re-posting it here because it's extremely practical and useful for understanding and combating leftist control tactics.

====Begin Text====

OPERATION RED SHIFT Crowdsourced narrative shifting for right wingers

---

STICKY NOTE SUMMARY

I figured out how leftists succeed at entryism, and how we could do it too instead of fleeing from it endlessly.

---

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Leftists make everything leftist by shifting narrative. Whenever leftists encounter a neutral subject of discussion, the narrative shifts leftist. Rightists then abandon it in frustration, having no way to counter it.

I thought hard about why that is, and realized what it is leftists do to accomplish that. It's nuanced and yet so simple.

Leftists have codified tenets of leftism, as contained in various manifestos (ex: Communist Manifesto).

Using those codified tenets, they shift narrative in this simple fashion:

1. keep their list of tenets on hand
2. form informal think tanks (all leftist gatherings)
3. in those think tanks, figure out ways of talking that presume the tenets are true
4. all agree to go out and talk in those terms, everywhere, as much as possible
5. ignore criticism and counterarguments of the above, just keep repeating it

example:

1. they axiomatically hold that equality is true
2. the equality believers have a Social Justice Book Club
3. In said book club, they have the following conversation: "since equality is true, gender must be false, how can we speak in a way that is in accord with our tenets?" "simple - refer to lovers in gender neutral terms such as 'partner.' All in favor?" (all commies raise hand)
4. they all go out and make a big point of always saying "my partner"
5. if anyone points out how stupid it is, they ignore them and keep doing it, with a wink and a nod to their fellow commies
6. all third party observers assume the tenets must be true, or even if they don't ,they socially absorb language that does
7. people who are successful in furthering left wing rhetoric are socially favored, strengthening the social hierarchy within that movement and concentrating the smartest and most effective towards the top ranks

Classically, the right has no defense against this because doing this requires an explicit list of the tenets of "our belief," which rhetoric can be intentionally infused with. The right has no such, and just sees itself as all that is not leftist, and has no such codified tenets of belief.

The fix is to codify the beliefs (sample included below in section VI), and then begin doing this too.

Lefty newspeak is actually their most powerful weapon, they understand that as goes the narrative, so goes society.

We therefore need a bunch of parallel think tanks with the explicit goal of concocting rightist newspeak in accord with listed tenets, then pushing that newspeak OUTSIDE that think tank, then reporting back on their results. Further, every rightist social grouping (company, church group, gun club, etc) should begin to use these methods in massive parallel, and socially reward those who are most successful at pushing right wing ideology. This will both get results and socially strengthen the right.

---

CONTENTS

I. The Problem II. Methods of the Enemy III. Dropoutism as Suicide IV. The Solution V. Current State of Right Wing Rhetoric VI. Sample Tenets of Conservative Belief VII. Example of Deployment

---

I. THE PROBLEM

Leftists dominate through language, shifting narrative. They will enter a non-leftist discussion on a neutral topic, and reframe it until the discussion is taking place on their, i.e. Leftist, terms. Rightists persistently fail to even stop this, much less reverse it.

---

II. THE METHODS OF THE ENEMY

How do leftists do this?

It's actually extremely simple. They:

1. List core tenets of their belief.

This is done in various leftist manifestos, such as the United States Declaration of Independence, which explicitly elevates equality to unquestionable axiom.

2. Create many informal think tanks that:

i. figure out how to push their ideological tenets further to logical conclusions.

For example the USSR focused heavily on general equality of income, whereas after decades of think tanks modern SJWism focuses on equality of both income and intangible benefits like "privilege" based on a nuanced ladder of privilege classes.

Another example is the rise of reddit, which gave users equal voting abilities and democratized the internet, as opposed to prior forums with "reputation power" systems where the USER rather than the content was voted on, which then translated to individually weighted voting power for each user based on their past performance in the community.

One of the largest websites ever to exist was literally caused by think tank discussions on how to push leftist ideals further towards their logical conclusion.

ii. Collaboratively, figure out how to make ALL of their rhetoric presume, and thus promote, leftist ideas.

Why do you think they all started referring to "significant others" and "partners" a few years ago instead of "boyfriend/girlfriend/husband/wife"? Because, somebody sat down and had this conversation:

Leftist A: "How can we speak in a way that further presumes gender equality as well as defying the social construct of gender?"

Leftist B: "I have an idea, let's figure out terms for lovers that don't even REFER to the idea of gender!"

Leftist A: "I love it! All in favor?"

(Leftist comrades all raise their hands)

You can easily find venues where they explicitly discuss doing this, on purpose, both online and off. What do you think they are doing at all of their social justice book clubs, student societies, social studies programs and sustainability retreats?

3. DEPLOY these rhetorical tools, persistently, and ignore all criticism or argument against it.

You see this online all the time. Next time you're on a forum, challenge a specific person over their use of leftist lingo, such as "my partner." Point out that their "partner" clearly has a gender and that there is a historically accepted gendered term they could use. They will ignore you and continue to say "partner."

That's how this works. The intended audience is not you, the critic, it's the third party observer, who sees 99% of the people on the forum using gender neutral terms and 1% impotently raging against it while nobody pays attention, and assumes that gender neutrality must be the correct thing to do.

THAT'S IT. This 3 step plan is ALL leftists do to consistently left shift all rhetoric in the entire Western world.

Tenets->expand upon tenets->collaboratively refine rhetoric to PRESUME tenets->deploy new rhetoric on all topics and in all venues->ignore all negative response to new rhetoric, continue to apply persistently, acknowledging their fellow comrades with a wink and a nod.

---

III. DROPOUTISM AS SUICIDE

Rightists, being "doers" more than "talkers," have no reply to this. This is not an arena in which they are used to competing, so they retreat ("white flight," "exit") or they soothe themselves with comforting fantasies in which the left-right conflict comes to a non-social resolution, such as:

-SHTF, where harsh physical conditions naturally favor rugged and reality oriented rightists, causing leftists to die out (conveniently without rightists needing to compete directly with them)

-A hypothetical civil war where rightists decide "enough is enough" and exterminate the leftists easily with their superior methods. This of course is a joke, as rightists reserve harsh punishment for heinous crimes, so leftists make sure their offenses are never heinous enough to warrant it. The rightist, lacking a solution between dissociation and shooting the offender, implodes with frustration.

---

IV. THE SOLUTION

The solution should be obvious at this point: we start doing it too.

We need to:

1. Develop listed tenets of what exactly we believe (no equality allowed). At the end of this document, a sample list of core right wing tenets is presented.

2. Develop informal think tanks on all services to:

i. figure out how to apply these ideological tenets in real practice at all scales (nation, internet forum, business, church group, romance)

ii. Collaboratively, figure out how to make ALL of our rhetoric presume, and thus promote, rightist ideas, regardless of where the discussion is, with who, or what it is about.

3. DEPLOY these rhetorical tools, persistently, and ignore all criticism or argument against it, keeping our eye on the real target (the third party observer), and acknowledge our fellow rightists with a wink and a nod as we join the fray.

4. Socially favor those who are effective at furthering right wing rhetoric. This will build healthy social hierarchy in the right, with those who are effective rising towards the top. This itself is an expression of the right wing tenets listed below.

---

V. CURRENT STATE OF RIGHT WING RHETORIC

Libertarians:

Brilliantly and lucidly execute step 1, listing their tenets, but foolishly incorporate equality and so lack conviction in countering the leftist devil. They form think tanks, but those think tanks do nothing to rhetorically promote their listed tenets outside of the think tanks, mostly because they foolishly believe in letting the masses freely believe whatever they want without any guidance, which creates a power vacuum leftists happily occupy. They create a golden list of holy commandments, then create a forum with 10 members who sit around and smell each others' farts.

Natsocs:

Do a shaky job of listing their tenets. Their tenets are better than libertarians, but they generally fail to distill out the perennial principles from the parts that were peculiar to Germany or its circumstances. They develop thinktanks, but those mostly become history circle jerks and purity spirals, and fail to do any successful rhetorical development. Rather than spreading their rhetoric virally, reprogramming the masses to instinctively think in their terms, they tend to bleed members in an effort to remove infiltrators and racial contaminants. They conduct a circular firing squad on their home turf, rather than developing effective rhetoric and forcing the enemy to fight against it, and going back to their think tank to regroup and learn from their experiences.

Pagans:

They also do a shaky job listing their tenets. They have a vague idea what they want, they need an EXPLICIT and ITEMIZED list of what they want to promote, so they can audit their own rhetoric and decide if it does a good job presuming and thus promoting those tenets. Note that shaky tenets are tough to unify people around, and how are you going to promote a vague feeling? How are you going to know if it worked? They create think tanks but they tend to be content sparse as they don't really know what they believe. Mostly they seem to be historical study clubs that encourage weight lifting, metal and long hair. Not a bad start, but it won't take back the West.

Christians:

Do a good job listing their tenets, as an ancient book contains them. However, their tenets presume equality as explicitly as Antifa. Christians historically do a good job creating hierarchy (clergy) and think tanks (bible studies, student clubs), and are even traditionally pretty good at proselyting/recruiting those beliefs. This of course is not a good thing as they are the original proto-leftists, still extant though reviled and disavowed by the SJW that evolved from them.

The modern alt right:

Does a PHENOMENAL job of crowdsourcing their rhetorical tools/memes, but a very poor job of coherently listing their tenets. They need thought leaders to do that for them, and while they have many ecelebs for some reason very few of them have undertaken this task, and the masses have not taken it seriously. The alt right has crowdsourcing down to a science, millions of those disaffected by leftism flock to it, but their think tanks lack the direction of a coherent list of tenets that they are trying to virally promote via rhetoric that presumes them.

---

VI. SAMPLE TENETS OF CONSERVATIVE BELIEF

This is the moneymaker. This is what you, any of you, can use to start a think tank with friends and begin applying the process, figuring out how to: apply the tenets in all situations, push them towards logical conclusions, refine rhetoric that presumes and thus promotes these beliefs, persistently work it into conversation whenever possible, ignore criticism and never relent, acknowledge your fellow rightists with a wink and a nod.

0. Reality orientation.

Reality is to be faced, even if it is not pretty. No realistic thought or behavior can occur without it.

i. Inequality.

Equality is not real, even genetic inequality is a fact (between and within races). Genders are not equal. Children within a family are not equal.

ii. Standards and Hierarchy.

A clear idea of "superior" and "ideal." We suggest an ideal of traditional families of norse-germanic people surrounded by forests, living clean and productive lives, being fit, healthy, athletic, attractive, intelligent, orderly, and morally sound, having organized communities that exclude everyone else. This gives us a yardstick for deciding who "matters." Since equality is not true, lives are not equally valuable, their value depends on the relative value of their genetics, talents, moral character, and contributions.

iii. Homogeneity.

Diversity does not work. Difference leads to conflict and mistrust. People who are different have only their own interests at heart, they will always work against each other. This is not productive (only moving towards the ideal is productive).

iv. Stability.

Take what works well, keep it, attempt INCREMENTAL improvements over time. Do not try to "revolutionize," like neurotic leftists. Further, encourage that which rewards stability (family unit, personal discipline) and discourage/punish that which destabilizes individuals, institutions and societies alike (intoxication, all forms of sexuality that do not promote a healthy stable lifelong family with high trust, immigration especially of different races).

v. Order.

In art and in all things, it is better to be orderly and clean, with simple elegance, rather than disorderly and complex. We take this as aesthetic axiom, but it also minimizes the effort needed to understand your environment/society, freeing up that mental energy for more productive and enjoyable things. It also makes it easy to detect people who are too dysfunctional to be orderly.

vi. Organicism.

It is necessary to allow people room to experiment so that they may be rewarded (or punished) for what they do. Rigid, sclerotic societies and institutions do not last long. On that basis, the overall burden of punishment of bad behavior on society must be sufficient to discourage bad behavior, but not so severe as to discourage experimentation. Overly draconian societies reward good liars.

Further, we stand for vitality of men and women towards the scope of their genders, passionate maleness and femaleness, which is the natural state of things absent any ideology forcing it to be otherwise.

vii. Progress UPWARDS.

Reward achievement and superiority, so that you may have more of it, and more of the people that do it (and the genetics leading to it). Punish and discourage bad behavior and low quality people, so you may have less of them. Rightists agree on this, but differ in method (i.e. free market vs state run eugenics programs), but the principle is more important than the methods. In terms of these tenets and ideals, whatever is good must be rewarded and cultivated and whatever is bad must be discouraged, punished, and eventually eliminated.

viii. Thousand year sustainability.

A good society is designed to last for 1,000 years or more. This way, when one generation uplifts the excellent, ignores the mediocre and punishes the subpar, that excellence can contribute to the next generation. With stability, organic experimentation, and UPWARDS progress, this compounding effect can continue indefinitely, improving society from generation to generation. Further, a civilization with its eyes fixed to the far future is going to consider the environment, not wanting to choke on its own wastes. It would also not want to embrace any LGBT foolishness, as LGBT rarely breed and NEVER form a stable family unit, and thus cannot be an integral part of society's structure.

---

VII. EXAMPLE OF DEPLOYMENT

Let's say you find a forum on rock climbing. Rock climbing is a neutral activity. How can you work right wing tenets into discussions of rock climbing?

Get your friends together and figure out how to discuss rock climbing in a way that presumes these tenets. For example, presume inequality by casually pointing out that elite climbers have a different body type, muscle fiber type etc. than mediocre climbers, and that difference likely owes itself largely to genetics. Don't make that its own point, just casually allude to that reality as part of another discussion, using evidence if possible. You could also weave in notions of stability by pointing out that it's important not to change "too much too soon" in one's climbing technique, for example, while still applauding organic experimentation to find newer, better methods.

If somebody takes issue with any of this, IGNORE IT and KEEP DOING IT. If you see somebody on a forum doing this too, HELP THEM.

The whole time, keep your eye on the ball. Your target audience is not the person you are talking with, it's the dozens who silently observe the exchange. You want them to see the forum overrun and socially dominated with people who competently talk about the topic at hand in a way that assumes right wing tenets are true, while impotent SJW rage neurotically about irrelevant SJW issues in a corner while nobody really pays them any mind.

The idea is that after a few months of rightists pushing these ideas in informal collaboration, the climbing forum will be an effective echo chamber of right wing thought. This would also objectively improving its practice of climbing by promoting right wing reality orientation, organic experimentation, the reward of successful methods and scorn of inferior ones, rewarding talented and good faith contributors with extra rights, while punishing/ostracizing people who are mediocre and bad faith posters. Promote the activity in earnest - in a right wing fashion.

MIND YOUR WORDS AND YOUR SOCIETY TAKES CARE OF ITSELF.

---

This way we can actually DO something. We can form an internet hessian warband, encourage others to do it too, and fight back and win. Take back our society with mere words.

Anything you refuse to control or defend, the enemy will happily take from you.

====End Text====