No. What? No, literally everything else points out to be Belle. The "puzzle genius" and the "you're not part of the family" lines, all corresponding to Belle. Why would it be anyone else
Also the descriptions literally say
"Paul created additional recordings in 2017 (…)".
The person recording is Paul, it can't be a friend.
Why does everyone seem to forget this when asking wether he's saying "Paul" or "Belle". Seriously, even if it isn't Belle, he's clearly not saying "Paul"
Edit: no, you got it wrong. They're explaining why their ROOM isn't in the game. Come on people, how do you miss that. Stop saying the person at the other end is Paul, it clearly isn't.
Yes, they're talking about their friend not having a room in the game, but in-context they're telling them they're completely irrelevant to the game and shouldn't be featured at all. I'm pretty sure if the narrator was talking to Belle, they'd have mentioned "oh and also you're in here as this creepy girl".
In fact, the narrator refers to Belle during the conversation when he brings up "the Tiara character", clearly not connected to the person he's talking to.
In what context does it make them completely irrelevant and shouldn't be featured. I think you're getting the wrong context there, the "Not featured at all" is something you took to an extreme and there is no indication of this at all.
Yes, he said the "Tiara character" because he doesn't think he's speaking to Tiara, he thinks he's speaking to Belle, two different people. Well, at least in his mind. Tiara is a failed rebirth of Belle, so why would he call her by Tiara if she never became Tiara.
Stop making assumptions. He's talking to Belle, not someone else named "Paul". As I said before, my reasons and evidence are directly mentioned in Petscop by "You're not part of the family" and "Puzzle genius". These two being exclusive traits to Belle. Why would the narrators suddenly bring someone else with these traits at this point in the series, it makes no sense. Remember this is a story, and given the level of storytelling that Petscop has, doing this would be a severe drop in quality, regarding the story.
Your "it isn't belle" is based on assumptions and a misheard word in the video, whereas I bring you two exclusive and key traits of a previously known character.
No. What? No, literally everything else points out to be Belle. The "puzzle genius" and the "you're not part of the family" lines, all corresponding to Belle. Why would it be anyone else
Also the descriptions literally say
The person recording is Paul, it can't be a friend.
Why does everyone seem to forget this when asking wether he's saying "Paul" or "Belle". Seriously, even if it isn't Belle, he's clearly not saying "Paul"
The narrator is explaining to his friend why they wouldn't be in the game. Belle is in the game.
What do you mean?
Edit: no, you got it wrong. They're explaining why their ROOM isn't in the game. Come on people, how do you miss that. Stop saying the person at the other end is Paul, it clearly isn't.
Yes, they're talking about their friend not having a room in the game, but in-context they're telling them they're completely irrelevant to the game and shouldn't be featured at all. I'm pretty sure if the narrator was talking to Belle, they'd have mentioned "oh and also you're in here as this creepy girl".
In fact, the narrator refers to Belle during the conversation when he brings up "the Tiara character", clearly not connected to the person he's talking to.
In what context does it make them completely irrelevant and shouldn't be featured. I think you're getting the wrong context there, the "Not featured at all" is something you took to an extreme and there is no indication of this at all.
Yes, he said the "Tiara character" because he doesn't think he's speaking to Tiara, he thinks he's speaking to Belle, two different people. Well, at least in his mind. Tiara is a failed rebirth of Belle, so why would he call her by Tiara if she never became Tiara.
Stop making assumptions. He's talking to Belle, not someone else named "Paul". As I said before, my reasons and evidence are directly mentioned in Petscop by "You're not part of the family" and "Puzzle genius". These two being exclusive traits to Belle. Why would the narrators suddenly bring someone else with these traits at this point in the series, it makes no sense. Remember this is a story, and given the level of storytelling that Petscop has, doing this would be a severe drop in quality, regarding the story.
Your "it isn't belle" is based on assumptions and a misheard word in the video, whereas I bring you two exclusive and key traits of a previously known character.