Three Pillars of Corruption in Ukraine - Joe Biden, Adam Schiff, Hillary Clinton

I don't really want this to be long because I have a second story to do that just popped up, but these are the three people closely tied to Ukraine corruption. For two, Obama is directly culpable in their corruption by looking the other way. However, since a lot of progressives aren't connecting the dots, it's time to truly do so in order to realize why these people can sink Obama's legacy and Trump is the natural conclusion of it. Just remember one thing about this entire issue: Corruption for me, but not for thee.

#Joe Biden

As we all know, Joe Biden's son, Hunter, was on an oil board and Biden got a prosecutor fired for investigating him. John Solomon explains:

In his own words, with video cameras rolling, Biden described how he threatened Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko in March 2016 that the Obama administration would pull $1 billion in U.S. loan guarantees, sending the former Soviet republic toward insolvency, if it didn’t immediately fire Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin.

“I said, ‘You’re not getting the billion.’ I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours. I looked at them and said: ‘I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money,’” Biden recalled telling Poroshenko.

“Well, son of a bitch, he got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time,” Biden told the Council on Foreign Relations event, insisting that President Obama was in on the threat.

And what was the issue?

But Ukrainian officials tell me there was one crucial piece of information that Biden must have known but didn’t mention to his audience: The prosecutor he got fired was leading a wide-ranging corruption probe into the natural gas firm Burisma Holdings that employed Biden’s younger son, Hunter, as a board member.

U.S. banking records show Hunter Biden’s American-based firm, Rosemont Seneca Partners LLC, received regular transfers into one of its accounts — usually more than $166,000 a month — from Burisma from spring 2014 through fall 2015, during a period when Vice President Biden was the main U.S. official dealing with Ukraine and its tense relations with Russia.

Now hold on to that for a minute...

#Adam Schiff Let's move to Adam Schiff. His recent issue has been to lie about Trump in regards to the testimony given in the Ukraine call

"Shorn of its rambling character and in not so many words, this is the essence of what the president communicates: ‘We've been very good to your country. Very good. No other country has done as much as we have. But you know what? I don't see much reciprocity here. I hear what you want. I have a favor I want from you, though. And I'm going to say this only seven times, so you better listen good. I want you to make up dirt on my political opponent, understand? Lots of it. On this and on that. I’m going to put you in touch with people, not just any people. I’m going to put you in touch with the attorney general of the United States, my attorney general Bill Barr. He’s got the whole weight of the American law enforcement behind him. And I’m going to put you in touch with Rudy. You’re going to love him, trust me. You know what I’m asking and so I’m only going to say this a few more times, in a few more ways. And by the way, don’t call me again. I’ll call you when you’ve done what I asked.’

"This is, in sum and character, what the president was trying to communicate with the president of Ukraine. It would be funny if it wasn't such a graphic betrayal of the President's oath of office. But as it does represent a real betrayal, there's nothing the president says here that is in America's interest after all."

There's a reason he's lying. But he's also coordinated a whistleblower complaint with the CIA

The “rogue intelligence officer” being called a “whistleblower” likely coordinated his complaint with Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), speculated Fred Fleitz, president and CEO of the Center for Security Policy and a former member of the intelligence community.

Fleitz — who served as deputy assistant to President Trump and to the chief of staff of the National Security Council — has previously held national-security jobs with the CIA, the DIA, the Department of State, and the House Intelligence Committee staff. He offered his analysis of the “whistleblower” complaint during a Thursday interview on SiriusXM’s Breitbart News Tonight with host Rebecca Mansour and special guest host Colin Madine. Fleitz reflected on Thursday’s hearing before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, chaired by Schiff, with Acting Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire’s testimony. The hearing ostensibly sought to investigate a “whistleblower” complaint released to Congress and the public regarding President Donald Trump’s July conversation with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

Now the other aspect to this is that Trump asked for help on figuring out Biden and other issues

Kiriakou pointed out that Trump allegedly asked President Zelensky to help with this investigation and then the quid pro quo was $250 million in aid to Ukraine” but the details in the readout of the call are “much more cloudier” than Democrats have been willing to accept.

“I think that perhaps the Democrats in the House have gotten a little bit ahead of themselves. I’m not sure that what we have here is an impeachable offense yet. I think it remains to be seen. It certainly warrants an investigation,” Kiriakou said.

The issues the Ukraine call whistleblower had with convincing the Director of National Intelligence to provide his complaint to Congress, as the DNI should under the Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection Act, is why Kiriakou ultimately went to the press to blow the whistle on CIA torture.

“My chain of command created the torture program. So I couldn’t go through my chain of command and say, hey, I think everyone of you guys is committing a war crime or a crime against humanity and so I want you to report yourselves. That’s not going to work. And I couldn’t go to the oversight committees because they were implicated in the creation of the torture program.”

Kiriakou recalled how Drake, an NSA whistleblower, went through his chain of command and wound up charged with several counts of violating the Espionage Act.

Now the question is... Why is Schiff lying?

Because Schiff has connections to the Ukraine he wants covered up and he wants Trump taken down on corruption. Igor Pasternak is a Ukrainian arms dealer that has also funded Adam Schiff. Getting away from the crazier sites, the base research on Adam Schiff and Igor Pasternak links are just as well documented.

The fire here is that Igor's interests are being harmed by an investigation:

It seems doubtful that President Trump knew about this relatively obscure development when he had his 25 July phone call with President Zelensky. But it’s a strong bet that a lot of Democrats in the U.S. knew (such as political activist Alexandra Chalupa and her Ukraine-embedded network, which was so active in seeking dirt on Trump during the 2016 campaign). As the link above indicates, Igor Pasternak had already posted a statement about the investigation at the Aeros company website (the date of the statement is 24 July).

Without judging the merits of the case one way or another – not even possible from outside the circle of facts and evidence – we can nevertheless suppose that this is a sensitive matter for Americans heavily invested in links with Ukraine. It would color how such persons saw any push from the president, especially a president from the opposing political party, for more robust investigations by Ukraine. It would be a reason to dislike or even fear such investigations.

...

It remains to be discovered what it means in all of this, that a fundraiser for a top House Democrat found his company’s arms sale to Ukraine under investigation there in July 2019. For that, pointed questioning under oath may be required. But it’s not Mr. Pasternak who needs to be questioned.

So Schiff is corrupt and protecting a Ukrainian arms dealer. Liberty Unyielding has the most detailed aspects to this case outside of Aaron Mate who is taking it head on and debunking it through video. Make no mistake that Schiff has a conflict of interest in the Ukraine and doesn't want this to be the story.

#Hillary Clinton

Now Hillary Clinton... The queen of corruption...

Let's first realize that the Clinton Foundation was CORRUPT and took money from Ukrainians

Fortunately, I did decide to take a look and pretty soon my jaw absolutely hit the floor. Although the Wall Street Journal didn’t play up the connection, I was stunned to see that of all the oligarchs connected to foreign governments who donated to the Clinton Foundation while she was Secretary of State, Ukraine was at the very top. I thought this to be strange, but as I read on I just couldn’t believe how connected the main donor was to the current regime in power. Considering this is the main geopolitical hotspot on earth right now, many, many questions need to be asked.

Now I can sit here and talk about Clinton corruption all day... But there's an issue here. What's causing Hillary to come into the spotlight again?

Well... The email probe hasn't gone away. And her defenders have their own problems and issues as I and others have been pointing out. Comey should be fired as anyone can attest. But that's a digression for another day. Hillary's corruption in the Ukraine is the fact that her corruption with Ukraine oligarchs is becoming a hot topic already. And where the Corporate Democrats are blowing smoke, look the other way to see fire.

Hillary literally has no choice but to campaign again and win with Warren. There is not a chance in hell that Warren will win but Hillary is desperate to evade conviction on criminal charges. But the Ukrainian corruption is more likely to ding her than anyone else.

What is being investigated with Hillary is how she colluded with the Ukraine against Trump.

Here you have a meeting between a DNC operative in a foreign embassy receiving materials used to defame and derail the Trump campaign. This meeting had real consequences worse than in the case of the Eric Trump meeting which bored its participants to death.

So they implicated Paul Manafort. But that's not all:

In May, Solomon divulged that a DNC consultant, Alexandra Chalupa, “solicited dirt” on then-Trump campaign chief Paul Manafort, who’s in federal prison for bank fraud and other crimes.

That information came directly from Ambassador Valeriy Chaly. He told Solomon that Chalupa sought the Manafort dirt and hoped to get in before Congress. And, Solomon reported, “Chalupa later tried to arrange for Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko to comment on Manafort’s Russian ties on a U.S. visit during the 2016 campaign.”

The embassy turned down the DNC’s hitwoman.

“The Embassy got to know Ms. Chalupa because of her engagement with Ukrainian and other diasporas in Washington D.C., and not in her DNC capacity. We’ve learned about her DNC involvement later,” Chaley said in a prepared statement to Solomon. “The Embassy representatives unambiguously refused to get involved in any way.”

So effectively, the Dems are far more complicit in the Ukraine than Trump was. This "inquiry" for impeachment is a gift to Trump to target their corruption, and Trump will win against ANY corporate Democrat, including Warren, who holds water for Hillary.

There are two people that can beat Trump. No corporate democrat will beat the best representation of Obama's legacy than Trump himself. And of course, Obama is complicit in this. He was warning staffers not to let Biden embarass himself.

Yet this Ukraine scandal is bound to take him down just like it did Hillary and Biden as the public catches wind.

This is why Trump wins against neoliberals. Their own hypocrisy causes their downfall.