So...who wants to write the opinion letter on this one?
Posted Dec 1, 2019, 5:57 AM UTC · locked
Posted Dec 1, 2019, 5:57 AM UTC · locked
That design is completely wrong. It should shoot out of the barrel as the projectile.
Like a rifle grenade, or harpoon.
Better whittle it down to 37mm or boom goes the pupper.
Up until today I thought a narwhal was a fictional animal.
My wife thought the same thing until we saw one at Sea World
I’m still not convinced they aren’t fictional. Not to take away from the people who stopped the attack but I had a hard time thinking it wasn’t a prank.
This is already banned in CA.
I can not think of what you would ask?
I'm guessing that, in the "aquire a narwhal tusk and attach it to your EBR" process, the latter portion is the least illegal. You'd probably want to steer clear of mentioning how you relieved a narwhal of it's tusk in your request.
That thing is way too short.
That’s what she said.
Would be like a fixed bayonet right?
Exactly what I was thinking
If you put two elephant tusks on also, you can do a triple attack.
I’d be down if I knew how lol
Mlok, drill two holes
[deleted]
F
Hahahah i saw the Donut Operator vid on it just now
But tusks protrude from the mouth...
I'm afraid not many have the necessary metaphorical testicular fortitude to use that weapon against an armed opponent.
Depends on what the other guy is armed with. If it's a walrus incisor or a sharp stick, I'd be game. Otherwise the .40 comes out
Opinion- “that’s dope as fuck”