New rule to increase quality and make moderation easier

Every post now requires a comment by OP that contains 3 things:

  • Why does this fit this sub (summarize the face eating part)
  • Context (not everyone can be familiar with politics woldwide)
  • Source article (for example when posting a screenshot of an article)

An exception is of course when a post obviously doesn't need context because it is self explanatory.

You don't have to write a lot, just a few summarizing sentences. If you dont write the comment within a few Minutes your post will be removed. I hope that this new rule will make it easier for moderators and users to understand what the post is about (while also increasing the quality of content).

I will test this rule for a few days and make changes if neccessary, I will later decide if this rule will be permanent.

Please put feedback, questions and concerns under this post, I will read everything.

Update 1:

Set up an automod that reminds people in every new post.

​

Thanks to u/ObnoxiouslyPolitical for the idea!

Posted Jan 6, 2020, 3:38 PM UTC · edited

20120
djlewt•

Holy shit this is stupid and onerous, if you don't have time to do some basic moderation why don't you hand it off to someone that does? Seems like a much more reasonable idea than "ok you took the time to find and post this story, now justify it or have it removed!" that's just idiotic.

This isn't going to increase quality of anything, it's going to reduce submissions, even good ones. The idea that you can't obviously see that based upon the ultra basic idea that making unpaid submitters DO MORE WORK will obviously and certainly decrease quantity and/or quality means you're not really qualified to be doing what you're doing in the first place. Another clue to this is you contradict yourself in this very post, you say "an exception is if content doesn't need context" but if you set up a bot to remove any post without the comment then that line is invalid because the bot isn't going to know if a post requires context or not, all it knows is "comment below me required or delete".

You asked for feedback.

33

this is stupid and onerous

no u

making unpaid submitters DO MORE WORK

fucking lazy billionaire moderators

42
CthulhuseyeOPMod•
  1. Since I have set up the new rule I have not noticed a decline in new posts
  2. The Bot does not automatically remove any posts
  3. I only had to remove 1 post in the whole time, instead of the usual 1-3 a day

So far I only experience benefits from the test, I will let it run for at least one more week though.

Still, thank you for your feedback.

29
jimtheadmin•

Yeah, this is a pretty simple rule that is common in a lot of subs. It works just fine.

The idea that you can't obviously see that based upon the ultra basic idea that making unpaid submitters DO MORE WORK will obviously and certainly decrease quantity and/or quality means you're not really qualified to be doing what you're doing in the first place.

making unpaid submitters DO MORE WORK will obviously and certainly decrease quantity and/or quality

unpaid submitters

unpaid

Fuck, you're really dumb. Who pays the mods?

18

Who pays the mods?

Obviously Russia.

5
danaubin•

That's impossible. Russia doesn't support gay rights.

4
yIdontunderstand•

Good idea.

12
eyflfla•

As a new comer to this subreddit I suggest cutting down on the word leopard in the post titles. It's been really hard to understand what any post is about because they're all Leopard face ate face of leopard, leopard face eating leopard face face.

11
Irwi•

This is 100% the reason I unsubscribed. I swear some of the posters were misunderstanding the point of the sub and just referring to people in the articles as leopards for the sake of it.

8
Allowyn•

Hey as someone who just posted, I think this is a really great idea. The automod was immediate and clear. It allowed me to explain further what I had posted and linked to something else from the same satire group that I believe this subreddit would very much enjoy given the publication's article history.

7
negaspos•

Ya, I don’t think so

5
BrainlessMutant•

Hey guys I did a funny one and followed all the rules what happened?

2
fluffykerfuffle1•

just wanted to speak up in here to say this looks like a great sub and i have joined but when i saw it referenced haha i really did hesitate before i clicked it because ... you know... didn’t want to see...

: ) this is great!

2
GuriSnowpaw•

Can we unstick this? It's making it impossible to see any threads on the sub.

2
Blackheart806•

Dumb

2
[deleted]•

[removed]

1
Larusso92•

This one is pretty self explanatory, I do believe.

1
Fearonika•

Trump voter begs Trump to restore things he took away.

1
skwaak16•

Hi, mod. Thanks for the message and for what you do to maintain this sub. I hope that how my post fits is self-explanatory. Thanks for your consideration.

1
[deleted]•

[deleted]

1
H-E-Buddy•

****ee1sa setsw iswssqka

  • 8ewwq

  • wa, fw 5c

1
H-E-Buddy•

****ee1sa setsw iswssqka

  • 8ewwq

  • wa, fw 5c

1
H-E-Buddy•

****ee1sa setsw iswssqka

  • 8ewwq

  • wa, fw 5c

1
mothbrainz•

So there are exceptions but all submissions are removed if there isn't any explanation given within minutes?

1
[deleted]•

[removed]

1
[deleted]•

[removed]

1