r/web_design•
cryer

Has anyone used any of the following specific CMS? Magnolia, Textpattern, Expression Engine

I haven't found anyone who has had any experience (substantial experience preferred, of course) with the first two -- Magnolia or Textpattern. I have heard from others about Expression Engine but not quite enough.

On the flip side, I've heard lots about how great Drupal is but I do want to get first-hand accounts of the others. I've read that Textpattern is great from a designer's perspective but would it be good for a main company website that has lots of dynamic data (lots of existing home-grown javascript widgets [JSON] that build tables of data that update often throughout the day) and static content? And for Magnolia, it's Java, which is good for us, but how would it run under the same circumstances? It seems that Magnolia has an enterprise version whereas Textpattern seems not as robust for a enterprise/corporate environment.

The best way I can explain the site without revealing too much is to liken it to something like Nasdaq/Yahoo Finance/Google Finance with up-to-date financial data throughout the day, tables of data, news releases and profiles, with static content in other sections to describe products & services.

We've never used a third-party system before so this might be a naive way of framing my question so I'd like to thank everyone who has had experience and can provide their comments.

Posted Dec 20, 2010, 10:54 PM UTC · edited

35
ludw•

I have used Textpattern and while it's wonderful for a small blog, I don't think it's what you are looking for in this case.

1
cryerOP•

Why do you say that?

It looks like it would do the basic stuff we need in terms of roles for content, templates, etc. I talked with my coworker, and we've agreed that any of these choices would be able to hook into our javascript front-end (or at least should -- for example, JQuery should work on all of these CMS, I don't see why not. Is this not the case?) so that point has become a bit moot. The more important factor seems to be how it would hook into our backend, getting that data to load the page in the first place.

Also, I'm curious as to what your experience is with TxpSout's comment here:

http://textgarden.org/about/216/using-front-of-site-themes

Textpattern has marketed itself as the best choice for web designers, being easy and flexible for designers. How true is this? From what TxpScout says here, it doesn't seem so at all. What are your thoughts/experiences?

1
bkraft•

Why not talk to the Magnolia folks (i.e. us) to find out if Magnolia CMS fits your purpose? The world of CMS requirements is wide, and just because somebody claims x for CMS y doesn't mean a thing for you unless your requirements match.

From my vendor perspective, I can say that Magnolia has large clients, many customers in the financial sector and has a proven track record of being highly flexible.

For further reading, visit http://www.magnolia-cms.com, download the financial white paper (button on the home page) and for an independent third party analysis, why not head over to Ars Logica and download the free complete report about Magnolia CMS -> http://www.arslogica.com/compass_guide_reports/magnoliasoftware-compassguide.html

HTH

  • Boris
1
chopinslut•

I've used both Txp and Drupal. Designers and artists (I'm one) love TXP...you can put anything anywhere. The price is that you've really got to roll your own theme, from the very html beginning. For a site like you describe, I think Drupal would be your best choice. While good premade Drupal themes are scarce, there are very good headstarts such as the Fusion framework. The learning curve is exaggerated, and the community is very friendly and helpful. The panels and views components would make short work of what you want to do. Here's a recent link that may help:

http://acquia.com/blog/heather/drupals-welcome-mat-beginners

Good luck!

%%robert

1
withremote•

I'm a pretty big fan of TXP. It's simple and expandable. Once you get your head around the sections/categories schema, it's rock and roll.

1