mylegismissingim a guy btw•

Women shall have equal rights in the United States and every place subject to its jurisdiction. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.

I don’t understand why this is controversial. As far as I can see there’s only one reason why someone wouldn’t support this amendment and we all know what that is.

36
itsnotaboutewe•

From what I have read the word 'gender' was added so that sex becomes meaningless. What started out as a way of legally enforcing the rights of women has ended up being the means of their erasure. The amended ERA is not good for women.

14
brighteyesbehindyoustupid boy•

From what I have read the word 'gender' was added so that sex becomes meaningless.

I'm not seeing that:

http://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?201+ful+HJ1

15
bearknightelf8•

I'm not sure where you are seeing gender. Some of the narrators have incorrectly said the word gender in place of the word sex. But I do agree that if they add that word in replacement of the word sex, the amendment would change drastically.

8
mylegismissingim a guy btw•

I had a feeling that would happen. There’s been a lot of confusion over the five revoked ratifications and the two or three missed deadlines so it might have to start from zero in Congress. If it does, they’ll replace sex with gender and it’ll pass Congress easily. Might be a toss-up in the states, though. A constitutional amendment is a huge deal and most people aren’t keen on TRA stuff.

5
ImPiqued1111111•

They can do that??

3
8ritt8ee•

Sex becomes meaningless anyway if laws have to be applied equally to both sexes. ERA was never good for women to begin with. We need equitable rights, not equal ones. This could over turn sex based legal protections.

Plus the deadline for ratification passed, this is undermining our rights and our constitution.

3
HopeinaBottle•

Can you link where that was added in the law? Like the other user that linked to the virginia.gov site, I haven't seen that.

1
littlerbear•

Misogyny is strong in this land.

11
MsAndThrope•

I wish my mother was alive to see this. Every Democrat should be running on this and not the Equality Act which will render it meaningless.

8
quasarbar•

Okay, dumb it down for me, please. Does this mean the ERA now has enough votes to be added to the Constitution? Or do we still need more states to get on board?

6
MsAndThrope•

This is enough states but there is a challenge for it passing the due date. Dont know if we need a Constitutional amendment or not,

5
heidischallengeTervenclaw•

I’m not clear on all the details. It was passed in Congress in the early 70’s. They gave a 7 year deadline for 3/4 of the states to ratify. We need a bill passed in Congress that overrides the deadline and accepts all the state ratifications.

2
MsAndThrope•

Do you think they need a new bill? There was an article they were challenging the date in court.

1
heidischallengeTervenclaw•

I’m sure there are sources online that explains the next steps

2
JustYourAvgBotschrodinger’s lesbian•

can someone please copy and paste the text? it’s behind a paywall for me

3
brighteyesbehindyoustupid boy•

20100222D HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 1 Offered January 8, 2020 Prefiled November 18, 2019 Ratifying the Equal Rights Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

Patrons-- Carroll Foy, Ayala, Ward, Kory, Watts, Roem, Herring, Adams, D.M., Aird, Askew, Bagby, Bourne, Bulova, Carr, Carter, Cole, J.G., Convirs-Fowler, Delaney, Filler-Corn, Gooditis, Guy, Guzman, Hayes, Helmer, Heretick, Hope, Hudson, Hurst, Jenkins, Jones, Keam, Krizek, Levine, Lindsey, Lopez, McQuinn, Mugler, Mullin, Murphy, Plum, Price, Rasoul, Reid, Samirah, Scott, Sickles, Simon, Simonds, Subramanyam, Sullivan, Torian, Tran, Tyler, VanValkenburg and Willett

Referred to Committee on Privileges and Elections

WHEREAS, a concurrent or joint resolution is a resolution adopted by both houses of a bicameral legislature, which does not require the signature of the chief executive, and a concurrent or joint resolution is sufficient for a state's ratification of an amendment to the Constitution of the United States; and

WHEREAS, suffragist Alice Paul and others were imprisoned in the Commonwealth of Virginia for seeking equal treatment under the law; and

WHEREAS, Alice Paul wrote the current form of the Equal Rights Amendment to reflect the successful Nineteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which states: "The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex"; and

WHEREAS, Article V of the Constitution of the United States provides that amendments "shall be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of this Constitution, when ratified by the legislatures of three fourths of the several states"; and

WHEREAS, the founders of our nation did not include or favor further restrictions to the amending procedure of Article V; and

WHEREAS, the Madison Amendment was proposed by our first Congress, not ratified by three-fourths of the states until 1992, and certified as the Twenty-seventh Amendment to the Constitution of the United States 203 years after it was proposed, providing precedent of a lengthy ratification period; and

WHEREAS, Nevada and Illinois ratified the Equal Rights Amendment on March 22, 2017, and May 30, 2018, respectively, thereby exercising those states' rights to ratify a constitutional amendment under Article V of the Constitution of the United States; and

WHEREAS, the restricting time limit for the Equal Rights Amendment ratification is in the resolving clause and is not a part of the amendment proposed by Congress; and

WHEREAS, when Congress passed a time extension for the Equal Rights Amendment on October 20, 1978, it demonstrated that a time limit in a resolving clause can be modified if it is not a part of the proposed amendment; and

WHEREAS, no proposed amendment ratified in accordance with Article V of the Constitution of the United States has been excluded from the Constitution; and

WHEREAS, constitutional equality for women and men continues to be a timely issue in the United States and worldwide, and a number of other nations have achieved constitutional equality for their women and men; and

WHEREAS, Virginia has been pivotal to incorporating fundamental rights into the Constitution of the United States, as when Virginia's ratification of 10 amendments in 1791 established the Bill of Rights; now, therefore, be it

RESOLVED by the House of Delegates, the Senate concurring, That the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Virginia hereby ratify and affirm the Equal Rights Amendment to the Constitution of the United States proposed by the United States Congress on March 22, 1972, and ratified by 37 state legislatures. The complete text of House Joint Resolution 208 proposing the Equal Rights Amendment follows:

HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION 208 Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative to equal rights for men and women.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years from the date of its submission by the Congress:

"Article--

"Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.

"Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.

"Section 3. This amendment shall take effect two years after the date of ratification."; and, be it

RESOLVED FURTHER, That the Clerk of the House of Delegates transmit certified copies of this joint resolution to the President of the United States, the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, the President of the United States Senate, the members of the Virginia Congressional Delegation, and the Archivist of the United States at the National Archives and Records Administration of the United States.

3
brighteyesbehindyoustupid boy•

This is the official version,

https://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?201+ful+HJ1+pdf

but if I had cut and pasted the text, the line numbers would have been a formatting nightmare.

4
AutoModeratorMODfemininity is ritualized submission•

Welcome to Reddit's most active feminist community! This is a women-centered, radical feminist subreddit to discuss gender from a critical, feminist perspective. If you’re new to gender critical feminism, please familiarize yourself with our FAQ and some of these resources.

Please follow the rules and consider if your submission is appropriate for this sub or if it should be posted to a sister subreddit. See our dictionary of common terms if you’re unfamiliar with lingo.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1