1080p at 144FPS or 1440p at lower refresh rates?
I'm running a decently powerful system with a Ryzen 5 3600 and a 5700XT. After looking at benchmarks it looks like I could on average achieve about 144FPS in most games out today at 1080p. At 1440p its closer to about 85FPS on average. Max settings. Using Shadow of The Tomb Raider as an example I'd get about 110FPS at 1080p but only 75FPS at 1440p.
I could turn down settings to get higher refresh rate at 1440p, but that seems silly if I'm paying for a high resolution display.
My concern is that I have the money for exactly one monitor and I've heard downscaling from 1440p to 1080p is really gross so I wouldn't even have that as an option if I can't manage upgrade my components in a few years.
Posted Jan 21, 2020, 3:46 PM UTC
If you want 1440P then you should do 1440P 144hz.
Sure, on Tomb Raider you might only push 75 frames on all ultra settings. But what about other games you play that are less demanding? With that rig 75 frames is about as low as you're going at ultra/1440P save for the most demanding games.
I know that this an issue that divides us PC gamers, but except for a few specific settings, Medium isn't much different than Ultra. And you can boost your frames by 30-50% going down a bit. That's what I always do with no regrets. But that's personal preference.