Should I disenchant him?
Posted Feb 3, 2020, 7:51 PM UTC
2247
It's pretty niche in terms of meta but it's a really powerful and fun card that you could use in many situations if you're wanting to build your own deck.
if you need the dust though for a meta deck then perhaps consider it.
19
The effect is unique to Hearthstone. Togwaggle Priest is already thing, who knows what other decks he'll create in the future.
If you care at all about golden cards I'd keep it.
12
I wouldn't. If and ever a tempo priest becomes a thing, this will definitely see play.
It already received some great tempo tools in Mindflayer, Grave Rune and the upcoming Aeon Reaver. Right now it may not be viable, but future xpacs might have more tools to make it a top tier deck.
6
Exactly this - we still have about a year and a half of this in standard. 3 more major expansions with the possibility of smaller ones in between so there is tons of time for support.
On the other hand if you don't play priest and have been eyeing a legendary that'll fit good in a deck you run. By all means disenchant and craft something you'll use.
I saved my Golden Glinda and about 6 months later reaped the 3200 dust from the nerfs so that's also a thing to think about - even though this might not needed to be nerfed now neither did Glinda at the time of printing.
2
[deleted]
1
Galakrond Priest use it but if you want something better then do it are you missing any cards in another deck you have?
4
Well I wanted to make a warlock galakrond and the dust would help but I also never play priest so
4
It's a free legendary of your choice...
5
No
2
The thing is I never play priest so he would just lay around in my collection
2
The thing is I never play priest so he would just lay around in my collection
Sounds like you've answered your own question.
9
You never know
0†
Keeping a Golden Legendary around just because "you never know" instead of dusting it and getting something you actually want to play (trading 1 for 1 for another Legendary) is, in my opinion, a stupid approach.
It's like those people telling you to not disenchant nerfed cards just because you might want to play them in the future.
5
It depends on whether or not you plan to keep golden legendaries in the future. People that like the collecting aspect of trading card games enjoy the perceived value of a card. This one is pretty cool cause it makes a bunch of golden clones in addition to itself.
1
Dude this is a sleeper card so I would keep it but the problem is more with how horrible team5 is about balancing cards that only a few cards are beyond broken and autoinclude that other fun strategic cards like this can't shine.
2
[deleted]
1
Don't be so impulsive and dust every card you don't like immediately, esp. a golden legendary. The meta is constantly changing and if anyone learning anything from DoD, expansion times are turbulent af. Not only can Murozond potentially be effective in decks later on, but if the card text changes, then you get twice as much dust for disenchanting. If devs think that Murozond could use more gameplay and cut his cost down to 7, then you can get 3200 dust instead of 1600 dust. If you dust him now, you get a free legendary but what happens if you craft a legendary you think is useful but after a few days realize you made a mistake and something else was more useful?
2
They don’t offer full dust refunds for cards that are buffed.
1
Yes, disenchant since you wont play priest
1
I mean, I keep most stuff if there’s even a whiff of viability. This card just isn’t the one though.
The best he’ll be is when created by Alexstraza, for obvious reasons.
1
1
I disenchant every golden card I can, have never liked how they look and the extra dust is nice.
1
make tog priest!
1
Depends.
Do you want to play a class that is pretty bad most of the time until one or two decklists appear and then everybody just fucking despises you.
Then priest is the class for you
1
I don't play priest and this is still one of my favorite cards. I would say keep unless you really need a legendary to complete a deck
1
[removed]
1
The card is pretty good, and the art is amazing in my opinion. Highlander priest looks like it can become a thing in the future. But right now it’s not really a meta card. You make your own choices tho.
1
Will probably be good in the future
1
u never know what u might play in the future so....ur call
1
no
1
If you don't play a given card and don't really care about Golden cards (lots of people don't), there's zero harm in disenchanting a Golden Legendary. It's basically a "Legendary of your choice" ticket.
It's not a bad card and might see competitive play, but if you don't play Priest anyway, why let it rot in your collection if you could have a Legendary you want to play instead?
The only argument to be made is if it gets nerfed for an absurd interaction in the next year. However this card may be the least likely in history to have that happen because it’s opponent reliant.
Still; would you rather have one legendary now, or two legendaries next year? This is wizard poker not retirement savings, I'd take the legendary now.
This is a great point. I like that thought. Thanks for being realistic.
They should really rename HS to Wizard Poker :')
[deleted]
He can still get not Golden version
[deleted]
He can still open normal version od this card in packs