r/UFOs•
Robstailey

These UFO pictures from NASA are IMO the best ever taken, by far.

Posted Jan 25, 2011, 8:09 PM UTC · edited

1746
50lerp•

I'm going to save you a lot of clicking for High-Res:

One - Two - Three - Four - Five - Six

Now, educate yourself.

30
drmoroe30•

But, but....the spaceship answer is soooo much more awesome!

8
RobstaileyOP•

ah, the generic explanation. exactly what kind of space debris would you classify it as? look at the shape in the first frame. i have done a lot of looking around, and i can find nothing, nothing that we have ever sent into space that looks even remotely like that.

2
50lerp•

Generic answer for a generic claim. To claim this is a spaceship you've already made two assumptions:

  1. Spaceships exist.

  2. This is necessarily how said spaceships look.

i have done a lot of looking around, and i can find nothing, nothing that we have ever sent into space that looks even remotely like that.

This is an argument from ignorance. Just because you can't find a picture of this object doesn't mean you can fill in the gap in your knowledge by calling it a spaceship. You must first demonstrate #1 and #2 above.

Also, have you seen the amount of space debris? I seriously doubt you've done an exhaustive search or that an exhaustive search could even be done by a civilian. I should note that some space debris is the result of explosions/collisions.. so some of it would be in pieces and in unrecognizable forms from anything you could find on Google images.

19
[deleted]•

Not true, because aliens routinely clean up the space debris. So these must be spaceships!

More seriously, to the OP, I would say these are space debris or other more mundane explanation simply for the fact that they haven't been edited out of the pictures.

Gary McKinnon on the other hand, who claimed having watched a UFO picture when breaking into NASA's computers, may have seen something interesting.

3
unibox•

Neil?

1
BASGTA•

Aren't all the ships we send into space technically spaceships?

1
[deleted]•

Yes but have you done exhaustive research of all spaceships to prove that this is not one of them?

You have to first prove two assumptions

  1. That space dibris exist
  2. That this is necessarily what space dibris looks like

We know space dibris exists but you make the claim that space dibris can look like anything and my only question to you is....

Does space debris ever look like this

1
TheGr8Revealing•

Yes, I have studied every object ever sent to space, every possible shape and way these objects could breakup into, under every scenario of light/temp/environment. Then I took pictures of every possible shape/scenerio. The photo file I keep them all in is like 9 trillion billion infinite gigabytes large. I was unable to find this combination of shapes and colors in my database.

1
Clydesdale•

Zing!

0
[deleted]•

[deleted]

6
hogey11•

wait... lets just say for 1 second there are aliens out there...

we can assume they are intelligent beings, seeing as they have found a way to travel and observe/interact with us all the while being undetected in any measurable or empirical way. If this much is true (which can be neither proven nor disproven), why would I expect there to be a reasonable defined explanation for ANY of this stuff? Not just these pictures, but others as well?

If we take these "aliens" as intelligent beings, wouldn't it seem more likely that we only catch glimpses of the truth, as its always being obscured from us? and if this is true, we will never find "proof" as long as it is against the aliens will for us to know they are here or are watching.

My point is simply thus: From your perspective, your argument is infallible. I cannot argue that. In terms of hard, empirical data, those objects are most likely space debris. However, if I allow for any doubt in the "easy answers" (space debris), I can also see these growing number of pictures and video as being voyeuristic casualties of our growing technological prowess. Don't get me wrong - you are more right than I at this point. Doesn't mean I can't make a comeback tho... :P

0
JudoTrip•

Likely one of the dumbest things I've read.

-4
ihaveissues•

When rockets separate from the shuttle, for example, they tend to fall apart, so you get broken, twisted panels of rocket like this.

Let's put it this way: space debris is a possible answer for this. This isn't a symmetrical craft with a cockpit and such that would identify it as a spacecraft. Debris is even a likely answer. So why fixate on this? There's plenty more evidence out there, this ain't it.

4
[deleted]•

I don't think this is a space ship but why do you assume that a space ship would be symmetrical? It wouldn't have to be. It's not like it would have to generate lift or anything.

1
lilzilla•

Looks like a twisted hunk 'o metal to me. And yeah, it doesn't look like what we sent, up because it got blowed up or whacked with other shit up there. IMHO.

1
TroubleEntendre•

Well if your Google fu can't find it, then clearly it doesn't exist.

1
nedak•

^This post! The OP is a fucking moron.

Sure, alien life could very well be visiting, but you're seriously grasping for straws if you believe that those are extraterrestrials.

I'm sure NASA would really publish pictures like this if they were UFOs.

-10
Oryx•

Umm... yeah. There's really no need to be an asshole about it. The OP has an opinion and you (and I) don't agree. Neither of you can confirm or deny the other is wrong because you can't prove it. So lighten the fuck up.

Can we keep it civil while we discuss ideas? Otherwise we just slip into insult-land, and nothing is to be gained by that.

7
nedak•

No, I can't prove that he is wrong. However, through reason it is very easy to come up with the most logical answer

To jump to conclusions by seeing a very vague picture is a dangerous way of thinking. As somebody who is very interested in the phenomenon it's an insult to my intelligence when somebody decides to yell wolf without looking into it or using reason.

1
Oryx•

As somebody who is very interested in the phenomenon it's an insult to my intelligence when somebody decides to yell wolf without looking into it or using reason.

Maybe you need to just take a moment and get over yourself.

There are a lot of people in the world who are just becoming aware of this stuff. Educating them and discussing the 'why' of it usually works better than calling them a fucking moron. JMO.

I should add that 99.5% of redditors think we are ALL fucking morons here in r/UFO.

1
Urizen•

I'm proud of the skepticism exhibited in this thread and Reddit/UFOs in general. Researching UFOs can easily lead one into forming all sorts of conclusions from little to no evidence. The OP should have considered space debris before making such a boisterous claim. I agree, some of those pictures do look like a spaceship, but really it's just an undefinable shape, like a Rorschach ink blot. Our minds deceive us.

Because of this, as a UFO realizer, I want multiple eye-witnesses in multiple locales, with radar and/or photograph/videos to back them up. I want the object itself to display aeronautical maneuvering that human flight can't replicate. I want the object to react to the environment (for example chasing a jet). UFOs hold up to scrutiny and skepticism, so we can afford to be critical of claims/videos/photos/etc. Public photos released by NASA are not going to have UFOs in them. If they did, we wouldn't be hearing about this on Reddit first.

14
Oryx•

Agreed. Objectivity FTW.

4
TheGr8Revealing•

word.

2
TheGr8Revealing•

I'm also proud, this place has turned around quite a bit.

3
[deleted]•

That's weird, because I tried promoting objectivity in this subreddit on another account a while back and got downvoted into oblivion by the seething mass of people who absolutely and unquestionably believed that every blip in the sky was an alien spaceship even if it had N-numbers on the fuselage. I gave up on it.

1
[deleted]•

"We need high-res pics of UFO's before we believe"

Ok, here ya go.

"Space debris, NEXT!"

5
kingj1222•

Honestly just looks like "space junk" left out there over previus flights... but, its just my opinion.

4
timmy242•

If those are the best so far, you need to look at a few more images of space junk.

3
50lerp•

Yep. There are estimated to be tens of millions of bits of space junk. Most of it is very small. However, NASA actively tracks around 19,000 of these bits which are significant in size. Some of this junk is the result of satellites that have crashed into each other or that have been shot down by missiles. Is it any wonder that you're going to see random bits of odd-shaped materials floating around out there?

2
bobloco76•

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p2YsLk94qyc this was a good movie on this topic. cant say i agree with every thing but its not to far off to think it is possible. and hey the vatican say's its ok to believe in God and aliens.....

2
clarky_poo•

It's tumbling space junk, but IT'S COMING RIGHT FOR US!

1
TroubleEntendre•

THIN OUT ITS NUMBERS!

-1
bakeee•

whoa... img 6 looks like one of those space fighters from Independence day. (favorite movie from 6-9 grade)

1
bronen•

OH SHIT SPACESHIPS ON THE WEBS. Shut them up! http://news.exopoliticsinstitute.org/index.php/archives/890

1
sniggity•

Looks like swamp gas to me.

-3
TheGr8Revealing•

come original

-1
sniggity•

come sense of humor

0
TheGr8Revealing•

Come back when you've got one

0
sniggity•

come pot calling kettle black

0
drmoroe30•

Happy Birthday. Now get off of my Internets. :)

-4
sniggity•

Awww, that's so sweet. Thanks ! :^)

-1