is this very good?
Posted Apr 7, 2020, 4:39 PM UTC
913
Does it work? If yes then its good.
3
It looks nice to me, but the experts would probably try to keep the nice curves while making it more compact.
It always looks nice when two sets of road curve around each other and the trick seems to be how close you can place roads next to each other, while following the exact same curve.
I'm only on console, and its difficult to do but I've seen some very nice posts of interchanges on console here, so its do-able on any system but takes a lot of patience.
From an observer, not an expert!
3
Edit: never mind, I figured it out. I do think you might have one ramp where there's an exit before and after the tunnel that lead to the same direction.
3
Yes. They have one. If u look right to left on the highway, they do have 2 off ramps. One before the underground and one after. But in all in all, it looks a lot better than some of the stuff I make.
3
Oh, totally! I'm on console, so I can't make stuff half this nice.
1
I am to. My usual will look a lot worse. Roads in every direction.
1
This interchange is like a Picasso paintings, I am not sure what I'm looking at!
2
Seems a bit unnecessarily complicated, but if it works, it's good.
1
Its looks alright, quite daring but nice
1
The more spaghetti the better
1
[removed]
1
If you like spaghetti
1
It doesn't make a lot of sense to me that the main freeway digs underground into tunnels in order to pass under another highway that's already elevated on viaducts. Taking a look, I get the feeling that a lot of the elevated segments could probably be moved to ground level, too. Especially the lengthy loop ramps.
Try to keep in mind that in real life building an elevated road is generally several times more expensive than an at-grade one, building a sunken road is usually about twice as expensive as an elevated one, and drilling underground tunnels is an expense in a whole league of its own which is only undertaken by the world's biggest and richest cities.