The 9/11 attack also had planted explosives inside the towers

My argument will be fully supported by links regarding the footage of my claims.

I'm not here to force you into believing what happened on that day, because no one knows for sure, but you would be a fool if you denied the attack also used planted explosives as there is enough footage and proof of that.

The vast majority of people don't even know a third building colapsed (wtc7) apart from the twin towers. So there is no way 2 planes made 3 building colapse totally in sync.

All 3 towers colapsed also the exact same way they do as when they use controlled demolitions on various old buildings to take them down. (if you don't know what I mean - https://youtu.be/xYjF9WPyZfg) (and the colapse of twin towers for comparison - https://youtu.be/0VixEL9h9pk)

There is also footage of first responding firemen claiming they saw and heard explosives in the towers. No one knows what happened better than them. (footage provided on this video - https://youtu.be/djKIlXz8WJs)

The most convincing footage I found is a person being blown out of his office. When I saw this footage I couldn't believe it. There was also no fire on that floor. (the footage - https://youtu.be/w4-OjnMDLWw)

What happened on that day was horrible. But we can't completely forget the facts that not only the 2 planes were reponsible for bringing 3 buildings down.

Posted Apr 30, 2020, 10:28 AM UTC

20
nateroyer•

What did they gain, who got the gain from the demo of the building?

2
TAdi47•

Wider conspiracy points towards Iraq and interests in oil.

1
---Yes---OP•

Number 1: Just a month before 9/11, the World Trade Center’s lease was sold to Larry Silverstein. Silverstein took out an insurance plan that ‘fortuitously’ covered terrorism. After 9/11, Silverstein took the insurance company to court, claiming he should be paid double because there were 2 attacks. He won, and was awarded $4,550,000,000.

Number 2: The attack caused profit so they US Military could go to war and start invading countries for oil. In the decade following Sept. 11, 2001, military spending increased 50 percent.

1
butters669420•

Are you Eddie Bravo?

2
TAdi47•

It's part of a wider conspiracy theory. Still saddens our hearts with the events of that day.

I still belive that 2 planes were not enough to bring down WTC from the base.

2
UnpopularOpinionModsMOD•

Thank you for submitting to r/UnpopularOpinion, u/---Yes---. Your post, The 9/11 attack also had planted explosives inside the towers, has been removed because it violates our rules:

Rule 9: Megathread topics. Some topics are so popularly discussed that were we to allow them as regular posts on the subreddit, you would see little to nothing else. As such, we confine them to megathreads.

If there is an issue, please message the mod team at https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%2Fr%2Funpopularopinion&subject=&message= Thanks!

1
JamesMccloud360•

I mean if you absorb yourself in this enough, you'll believe anything. The thing is you aren't an expert in explosives just like people who make YouTube videos in their room aren't more educated than people who have studied space engineering their whole lives. Conspiracy theorists never just believe one thing they have to believe all sorts we didn't go to the moon, Chinese are harvesting body parts ect so I can't really take anything you say as proof of anything.

1
---Yes---OP•

No I don't believe that we didn't go to the moon. There is enough proof that we did. And I also don't believe in most conspiracy theories. I do believe in stuff I get enough footage and proof of though.

1
[deleted]•

[deleted]

1