"The evidence is overwhelming even if it is blind faith" How am I supposed to respond to this?
So, emailing with my dad has succeeded in finally getting a real discussion going (hooray), but I've now come up against this email (warning, really long) and am attempting to go through it bit by bit. I'm asking for help with some specifics, but if you read it and see something else that should be included in the response, please let me know!
First:
As a matter of interest they have taken every one of the prophecies and unless the time frame has not happened they have all been true. Also, science and historians have used the Bible in numerous ways to timeline and date some findings which further proves that the writings are true. It is the most widely read book in world, the most translated and with a few exceptions the oldest written.
What in the world can I say to this prophesy thing? Ridiculous. What can I say about the widely read/oldest thing besides calling out the argument from tradition? What is older?
Next:
You also bring up an interesting idea on IF there is a god he would not want us or send us to go to an eternity of torture. Good point and you are right in that God doesn't send anyone to hell or an eternity of torture. Each individual makes that decision for themselves. It is like if I decide I'm not going to make a decision or I decide not to act on something.
I just need a simple argument against this, because my brain has apparently stopped working today.
Third:
How can faith stop intellectual curiosity? There will always be that drive to know more and to attempt to prove it. I will venture to say that faith in something helps to further intellectual curiosity. The journey is what is important in life and life is all about the journey that we are all taking.
I know I've seen videos that explain this well, and I really should have saved them, but if you know anything that explains this well, please point me to it!
Last:
I've explained that I go to church with them occasionally not because I'm searching for anything that I can get there, but because I love and support my family (all of whom are extremely active at the same church). He completely rejects this idea and tells me that no, I'm really searching. How do I tell him he's being an ass by assuming to tell me what I'm really thinking without seeming like an ass myself?
Posted Jun 7, 2011, 12:17 AM UTC
If god is omniscient, he would have known exactly which people would eventually end up in hell when he created the universe. By continuing to create the universe in that fashion god has condemned them. If he is also omnipotent, he could have also chosen to create a universe similar in all respects, except those people would be spared eternal suffering. Therefore, god has chosen to condemn millions of souls to eternal torment in hell.
Well, I argued that god created hell in the first place, and he came back with this, but I like how you've phrased it better, I think, so I guess I'll try again!
Not to mention: (In your dad's argument) God created hell, but he didn't have to. He could have created a separate realm where "sinners" go after death to learn the "true" way, rather than punishing them. Or he could have created a system of reincarnation, where "sinners" just keep coming back until they get it right. Or whatever, the point is, he made that fuckin place. Dad's god is The Man from the South.