r/40kLore•
Krelious

Finished reading Saturnine, some thoughts (spoilers)

Spoiler

My favourite moment in the whole book was Abbadon fighting tooth and nail thinking this is the end only to be teleported out and asking to be sent back.

I was dissapointed how Aximand went out rather easily and ignobly albeit to Loken. I felt Aximand deserved more.

I think over all the book had a lot of dialogue that felt like filler. I dont think there was enough action or dialogue from the traitors as I feel these books should cover their perspectives more.

I feel overall Saturnine is a book of consequences that from my perspective the traitors misplayed the siege and perhaps doomed themselves as they expected to have a longer time frame and were thus not very careful with their troops, especially the emperors children.

The writing seems a bit derpy in portraying the emps children as they just kinda get taken out and that s it. I found it incredibly lame and a cop out to just say they become incompetent and fell for a trap when their motto is perfection. I dont care if they are tainted by the warp they are still space marines and not retards they should be capable of complex tactics and adaptation, instead the book literally and I mean literally just says well Fulgrim and his legion are arrogant so nearly all 100k of them just die to Dorns trap the end. The book doesnt even really describe the Violence its literally like Fulgrim saying haha dorn I have won dorn goes Nuh uh you fell for my trap card. Then Fulgrim goes oh noes, transforms and leaves leaving 20 of his best men to try to kill Dorn.

For a book series that is supposed to be portraying warfare and violence as well as individual battles id honestly rate Saturnine as a 6/10 being generous on that front. Also the cover is a big fucking tease because Angron basially does nothing.

I feel like the book had cool concepts and cool moments but it utterly failed in portraying the Saturnine trap in any meaningful way that the reader could visualize or understand. Its not really something easily understood I mean the author just says Fulgrim threw his entire legion at a section of the wall and they were winning until they found out it was a ruse and there was a larger fortification behind it and then Dorns troops off camera killed all 100k Emps children instantly. WTF its like the author had a brain fart and didn't know how to portray what was going on.

Then Later Dorn has this retarded conversation where he says he won because Fulgrim is good but hes also always been like a wild animal which is like paper beating rock in siege warfare. This is the dumbest explanation I've ever heard considering the primarchs are supposed to be demi-gods and above humans in terms of intelligence. Abnett is basically saying a super human demi-god who was bred for war and commanding legions who has experience in conquering entire planets and is known for perfection is now suddenly an impetuous teenager chasing glory and cant think properly against another strategist and this some how makes him still good. That's literally one of the dumbest things I've ever read. Its like imagine if you had a military commander who was an excellent duelist and diplomat and lover of fine art and because hes kind of aggresive and a big showman then it somehow makes it okay for him to be a crazy fuck up sometimes who can lose an entire army in a siege because that sort of battle is not his forte. BITCH when you are commanding a human army a regular unmodified human is expected to be disiplined and know how to deal with any sort of battle and has tonnes of resources for that, considering the tech we have today and the internet this sort of warfare is understood well by normal humans. You are now writing a story about genetically modified supersoliders who are supposed to be like living gods and masters of warfare that is bred into them and you write them off like oh hes just a fuck up because its in his nature to not be good against me.

I could understand this logic if you were putting a pro against a talented rookie or the commander of the us army is going against a general from Nepal. But no you are pitting two superhuman demigods who have conquered planets and were engineered for war. Its bad form to just say well one of them is kinda incompetent because hes a brash overconfident teenager in a god's body and I won because I was super disciplined he also knows me very well and decided to not factor in my super discipline or mastery of defense. I mean come on man, again unless its Angron that's just poor form. Considering Fulgrim tricks and beats Guilliman after the siege I think you should show the source material and characters and your readers more respect.

And again im not mad that Abnett had Fulgrim lose, Im mad because the way he portrayed it in every sense is childish. If you want to portray Fulgrim as a sadistic genius who is obsessed with pleasure you can do better than having him gloat at Dorn who responds with nothing or not much further baiting Fulgrim. If Fulgrim is so smart and perfect he should see through this and attempt to bait Dorn in other ways. I mean thats all I can say is if you are going to portray the champions of Slaanesh and a Deamon prince I dont think its good writing to just say its in their nature to be fuck ups in this situation. I would say Discipline in warfare and understanding your opponent could be an apsect of perfection and excess. In the end what I'm saying is that the defeat of the emperors children is too one sided and Dorn should have lost more or felt like it was more of an investment/sacrifice doing something unexpected like blowing up his own troops to kill more of the enemy or collapsing buildings ontop of everyone to create a more indirect killing field that is gritty and hard to assail.

I didnt expect to go on a rant but I feel like that section of the book which id argue is THE main plot point, there was no real pay off there and I found pay offs in other small moments that were too few and far between. When you fuck up the big moment or main plot line of your novel it leaves a sour taste in the readers mouth. Also when you feature Angron on the cover im expecting him to do something big.

Posted Jul 19, 2020, 4:21 PM UTC

1320
FFSAllNamesTaken1•

You misunderstood the defeat of the Emperors children, they don't lose 100k legionaries, they lose 18k.

The Emperors children "needed" to be defeated so that they lose interest in the siege and do their own thing to fit with existing lore, so that they can fill their place as beimg powerful come the legion wars.

Fulgrims defeat being quite childish actually fits his character as a demon prince. Primarchs have human emotions seemingly magnified, and the demon primarchs have those magnified even further. Fulgrim committed his legion to Saturnine because he liked the idea of the glory of being the one to break into the inner Palace, if it had been successful it would have been his legion who delivered the decisive strike. However that didn't happen, and it was revealed to be a trap, so Fulgrim, with his petulance turned up to 100, decided the whole thing was ruined and his opportunity to swing the siege diminished. Not the best reasons by any stretch but it does the job and gives him leave to go pillage the rest of Terra.

40
Comfortable-Team•

Kind of how a painting turned him crazy

8
loop388•

Honestly, I think Fulgrim’s loss is a perfect portrayal of what he’s become. He’s no longer a primarch, he’s a Daemon prince of Slaanesh. He’s still remarkably intelligent and capable, but he’s also driven by his emotions and desires to a massive extent. Him committing too many forces to a small area and losing massive amounts of them makes perfect sense to me. Same with him throwing a bitch-fit afterwards and leaving.

Dorn did feel a little OP throughout, but then, there’s a scene where Sanguinius single handedly kills a Warlord and Warhound Titan within minutes of each other. They’re primarchs, and the writers tend to be more over the top with them than normal.

Overall, I feel like the book wasn’t about any one conflict, but more about portraying the desperate battles that’s going on everywhere. It’s definitely a fluff piece, since it doesn’t really advance the plot in a meaningful way, but it’s a fluff piece that helps set the tone. It’s not as fun as a proper novel that moves the plot, but what can you do?

14
wecanhaveallthreeLegio Tempestus•

but what can you do?

You can get annoyed with BL for dragging out the Siege. They promised a super-tight, nail-biting finale to the Heresy. Instead, we've got puff, fluff and filler, dragged out several books (and short stories) too long. This isn't a shrug and 'oh well, that's just how long it takes'. This is a pretty blatant grab for cash at the expense of a clean and cohesive narrative.

9
loop388•

Yeah, but being annoyed doesn’t get me my money back or write a better story

4
wecanhaveallthreeLegio Tempestus•

WTF its like the author had a brain fart and didn't know how to portray what was going on.

This has been pretty par for the Siege so far. French does pretty much the same thing in Solar War.

I think over all the book had a lot of dialogue that felt like filler.

That's what happens when you try to fit what is a trilogy at best into, what, eight books?

I was dissapointed how Aximand went out rather easily and ignobly

Aximand is the Heresy's biggest butt-monkey. His only purpose is to be That Luna Wolf That Isn't Abaddon. There was definitely a lot of potential with him at the start, but the Sons of Horus getting basically zero screentime through the Heresy meant that those plot threads never bore any fruit.

I dont think there was enough action or dialogue from the traitors

SURE IS WEIRD HOW '''THE HORUS HERESY''' HAS A DIRE LACK OF BOTH HORUS AND HERESY

13
WhiskeyR1derAdeptus Custodes•

The best part? This is supposed to be a race against the clock before guilliman arrives, and still the siege is taking so much time that i have the feeling that guilliman is just parked outside Terra getting tired of waiting his turn

7
wecanhaveallthreeLegio Tempestus•

This was covered in Spear of Ultramar. Guilliman ran into a detachment of Iron Warriors and Word Bearers who stalled him with a fortified system/Warp ritual that sped up time, costing him [exactly however long it takes for him to be too late to the Siege].

14
WhiskeyR1derAdeptus Custodes•

Their warp mojo must be pretty strong since Sanguinius managed to arrive to Terra, hung out with Dorn, Russ and the others. Russ went a to Fenris has his revelation, then wolfsbane happens, later Horus had to repair the damage the wolves raid and then goes to beta garmon and fights for a bit before collapsing from Russ' wounds (Titandeath).

Then we have events of Slaves to Darkness and he goes ato Ullanor, at Ullanor he even decides to do the Dark Triumph parade thing and muster the bulk of his forces for the final push.

At least Horus goes from Ullanor to Terra and fights the Solar War, then he gets to Terra and lays siege to it.

10
jayfreck•

my biggest bugbear is the throwaway characters e.g. random trooper you've never heard of before and won't be in any other book. I just skip whole sections of the books dealing with the tedium of what they get up to. pure filler

-1†
eliseofnohrKabal of the Las Hatred•

As an Emperor's Children fan, I have to really agree with you here. Fulgrim vs. Dorn wasn't badly written, it made complete sense with Fulgrim's character as a perfectionist and lack of caring about the Siege, but I don't buy Fulgrim going down to Dorn like that(he's a daemon primarch and was already a great duelist before) and it's just not good storytelling. I didn't hate Saturnine by any means-despite my being a fan of this, I'm mostly in the Heresy for the characters rather than the big battles, and there were a lot of great character moments. I really liked it. But the whole climax was dumb and kind of wanky for the Loyalists.

The Siege of Terra isn't about the loyalists getting wins through cunning plans. It's about them getting pushed back against the wall and driven to desperation-which was something I did like, in a lot of scenes before the climax that shone true. I loved the characterization for Abaddon in the big fight, but as it is a mostly onesided defeat where the traitors get stomped while the loyalists don't take any major casualties(maybe they lose someone on Aximand's level, but Garro is boring and I don't read his books so I did not recognize anyone there) doesn't work.

...for what it's worth, I feel like Angron's scenes were fucking awesome. Possibly not coverworthy, but they were in the original story of the Siege of Terra and they were great.

3
boabzigi•

Is their a follow up book being written yet ? Anyone know ?

1
wifebtrSons of Horus•

Totally agree, a sloppy axe job of a book, dripping with loyalist bias and treating the rebels as utter jobbers.

Fuck me, they're besieging the greatest fortress in the galaxy, the XII and IV are charging the walls with ladders, axes and titanium balls and they get nothing. I'll never forgive Abnett for this.

His depiction of Dorn is ridiculous, he's so over the top Mary Sue-ish it makes my head spin.. And Abnett makes it seem equally "heroic" yet at the same time easy having him fight Fulgrim as staving off a whole SIXTEEN Astartes..while having two of the best fighters of the VII guarding his back.

Jesus Christ, any other Primarch usually just gets a handwaving when they fight mooks, be it traitor OR loyalist, but no, let's dedicate several pages to Dorn killing legionnaires.. I found it kind of ridiculous when Guilliman fought Word Bearers in Know No fear, but at least he was unarmed, badly hurt and in the void without a helmet. The narrative focus should clearly be on the insanely brave (emphasis "insanely") warriors of the III, not a Primarch, it's like reading about a rugby player smashing through a kindergarten, with the author expecting you to root for the 250 lbs man stomping 4 yr olds, what the actual fuck?

And the whole Saturnine gambit is ridiculous, 3000 of the best of the best getting murdered by 500 nobodies? Sure, Haar, Garro and Loken are superlative fighters, but the Mournival has straight up murdered everything so far in the series, not just by being good fighters, but excellent tacticians and leaders, Kibre and Aximand go out like chumps and they've been around from the very beginning.

Fuck this shit. Fuck Abnett. Should've let McNeill write at least one book.

-7†
ChaplainOfTheXVIIWord Bearers•

I understood what Dan was trying to do in the book but I still found the repulse of the EC and SoH somewhat unsatisfying. Aximand took on Loken in Vengeful Spirit and got the better of him, but succumbs relatively easily in this. I thought the reaccurence of his nightmares jarred as well. Where was this in Slaves to Darkness and The Solar War?

Kibre is in the Black Legion books but gets sliced in two by Garro and his magic sword? There is no inkling of any possession before this battle but when he dies an entity suddenly flees his body?

I liked the book and I was comfortable with the heroics of Dorn and Camba Diaz, and I liked Dan's portrayal of the human characters, but Loken and Garro are simply Mary Sue characters who have fulfilled their role in the HH story arc.

7
wecanhaveallthreeLegio Tempestus•

The answer is that Abnett doesn't give a shit about character development or what other people wrote, he's going to do things his way.

4
jayfreck•

was there actually an explanation as to why they are scaling the walls and doing it the hard way? It just seemed puzzling to me with the tech and firepower at their disposal that they were using ladders etc. I know it states they are 400m thick, but i would of thought they could blast their way through or go over, or something!!

2
FeralCunt•

Did you miss the entire thing of the spear tip burrowing under the walls?

1
jayfreck•

i meant the general descriptions of wall assaults before the finale of the book

2
FeralCunt•

They were ambushed and mowed down before they could even react. The entire point was that the loyalists knew it was likely to be the mournival coming, therefore they had to be mulched before they had a chance to get a foothold, because as you say, they were very elite.

3 entire legions were virtually annihilated in an ambush on istvaan, but youre losing your mind over 3000 getting smashed in a well prepared ambush in a confined space with no escape?

2
wifebtrSons of Horus•

3 Entire Legions were smashed by the majority of 8 others in an ambush and still inflicted noteworthy casualties in much worse circumstances.

Being ambushed with 3-1 odds on your side, with better men and better equipment is just a hard fight, but should still end up in a resounding victory for the side with a numerical advantage.

If the odds at Istvaan V had been 3 ambushers against 8 who were wiped out in said ambush, your allegory would be valid.

4