Ladies of Reddit, how concerned that someone has probably masturbated to a fantasy involving you?
Posted Sep 9, 2020, 12:59 AM UTC
Posted Sep 9, 2020, 12:59 AM UTC
Never even crossed my mind.
I’d be flattered
not concerned at all, i'm ugly as all hell and don't have many pictures of me on the internet
You'd be surprised by what guys fantasize about!
i'm not sure i want to know what guys fantasize about, thanks.
Not concerned at all. I'm sure hundreds of people have, but it has really has nothing to do with me. Its their own narrative, their own fantasy, their own projection, their own hormones. It's not even a compliment to me, either, as there are people out their who masturbate to like scat porn and such lol the bar isn't that high.
Did the same so no big deal
Not concerned.
Even like, an ugly guy. I mean, we're talking... yeesh.
I mean...it's super unpleasant to think about but I can't control thoughts of others so, get it homeboy!
Not a big deal.
Um eww. I've never thought about it and I hope I never have to think about it again.
Eh. I'd put money on a couple of my friends masturbating to fantasies of me. I've gotten off on fantasies of some of them. Tit for tat, as long as they keep it in their head, no harm no foul.
Tit for tat
Yes, please!
Wait. I mean...
I think we're going to need more evidence.
As Chandler says.. "Well, I'm not showing you my tat."
You do you. Just don't tell me about it.
Are they crying? It's hot if they're crying.
Hate the fact that someone would look at me like that
Couldn't care less
Not concerned. It's their emotional scars to bear, not mine.
I'd wager that for every woman there's at least one guy they work (or go to school) with who regularly fantasizes about them as they masturbate.
I've been told by four guys that they masturbated thinking of me. I'm not too concerned by it, honestly. Just don't tell me details like the one guy did.
Some of my socials are monetised so I expect it
I know there's nothing I can do about it, so I don't let it bother me.
I’m more concerned about people knowing that I’ve masturbated to them.
Everybody is somebody’s reason to masturbate
not fernando vii of spain im sure that no one tryed to do it
Not so. Working under the axiom "all people have masturbated to someone" does not imply "all people have been masturbated to". Proof:
For masturbators x and the set of all humans y (∀x)(∃y) [For every masturbator, there exists a person to whom they have masturbated] is not interchangeable with (∀y)(∃x) [For all humans there exists a masturbator directed at them]
IE (∀x)(∃y) != (∀y)(∃x)
QED
[deleted]