Monero protocol questions
I will preface by making readers aware and i am never wrong about anything so obviously i have been piling schekels into monero because its the only cryptocurrency that will be useful when Joe the taxman comes sniffing at your newly acquired 24 karat gold estate gates.
But yet it remains dormant, docile and limp dicked so my question is this given the opaque nature of the protocol how do we know funds arent being siphoned off by some sneaky developer who back doored some infinity production for monero? How is the creation of moneros verified? Do we simply not know and take it on good faith that the developers have the best interest of the community at heart π.
Given censorship resistant coins history of emission fuckery with bytecoin having shady developers and bitmonero having the same issues of which monero is a fork how can the community trust in any way that there is not tomfoolery afoot and how can the emissions of monero be verified and by that i dont mean some developer saying oh no its all good me and my 4 other dev friends here can assure you all is well carry on. I mean mathematically verified and proven and published with consistency and understandable for the lay person, so that people can have confidence in the protocol.
Expecting the usual monero community responses of go get a phd in cyber security and live in a basement for 5 years deriving sustenance from beans bought on underground web markets and than ask questions but maybe there is a simple resource i have missed. Thanks ππ»
Posted Jan 9, 2021, 4:02 PM UTC
Please have a look at Zero to Monero. Just a look is enough, scan every page diagonally and note how most of them have 50% or more of mathematical formula. Then take note that this thing has no less than 154 pages.
And then think about those "lay persons" you mention that you want to get confident by understanding Monero.
By the way, that book is excellent. It lowers the barrier of entry dramatically, with one of the alternative ways into deeply understanding Monero being directly consulting the C++ source code. But this stays hard and complex stuff, even if presented in an excellent way.
I understand that monero is highly technical and the possibility of onboarding lay people to understanding concepts behind monero difficult to near impossible. But i thinkk in this case a work around can be developed to establish more trust in the protocol even if not perfect. There are a lot of technically difficult projects that have more trust than monero simply by having technical spokespeople who have established trust or a more open community in terms of sharing knowledge and having patience with new comers and non technical people. I understand this has drawbacks for the idea of decentralisation etc but you can still have a decentralised protocol with spokespeople who help onboard people to its importance, usefulness and trust in the protocol Antonopoulos is the obvious example for btc. I will look a little closer at the link thanks for sharing my glance indicated it was overall technical but still had important and understandable elements to explaining monero.
Only the first 81 pages are about the core protocol, so it isn't quite that daunting :p